Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

White Narcissus · Post Post #1600 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:54 pm

In post 1597, notscience wrote:hey guys maybe they changed alignments halfway through the game so they started lurking

No that's not it, i was thinking probably going apathetic about their partner being lynched, and maybe their night kill being tinkered with in the way that you hinted to us the other day. Speaking of which, do you still think it's possible Taly died because of that?
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1601 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:55 pm

In post 1599, notscience wrote:And you're not chill enough to remember who did it first the last time it happened.

Who did what first
~Sakura

Ankamius · Post Post #1602 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:01 pm

Honestly, after all the posts today and the ISOing I did, I think Shadowcat's town.

Mala's posts today reminds me of how she played in the touhou upick game that ended recently. This isn't all that relevant since this was forever ago but she also had a very different attitude entirely in the game you modded where we were scumpartners.
I'm seeing a lot of genuine attempts to try to provide content throughout the last few days, including a consistent spike since the 6th.
Huntress' responses to me look really town. I get the feeling that she was trying to have a genuine dialogue with me despite having so much pressure on her, and the responses themselves cleared up the issues I had with her posts.

I just don't see them as scum.

Ankamius · Post Post #1603 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:02 pm

Mala: Can you post your reads in the thread in one post?

Ankamius · Post Post #1604 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:06 pm

I just realized I never actually answered your question.

Sakura: Can you quote where they refused to explain their reads?

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1605 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:08 pm

I'm actually more interested in the other head's reads, to be honest. I'm kind of hoping it's a lot more than that PT thing.

I don't mind mala's posts but, no offense, the reads lack depth. I am fine with the elaboration on the Loki read, though.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1606 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:33 pm

In post 1604, Ankamius wrote:Sakura: Can you quote where they refused to explain their reads?

I can't quote something they didn't do, what i can quote is every time we asked for them to explain their reads tho, the only thing that they straight refused to do because lack of time was explain Zelink's read.

In post 963, Shadowcat wrote:Interactions D1 felt weird, awkward and forced. Like scum trying to hide a secret. Also asking notscience what his darkness level felt off too.

Will elaborate more after work.

^
Never elaborated until now.

In post 1132, Shadowcat wrote:The reason I haven't been able to do this yet is because it involves going back over a good part of the Day 1 posts (not just your ISO) to find again the things I saw which made me suspect you. With the kids off school and college for the Easter holidays I haven't been able to concentrate on it as much as thought I would. Today it's been as much as I could do just to keep up with reading the new posts.

In post 1221, Shadowcat wrote:Not uninterrupted time, but I'll do a summary later and hopefully I'll be able to to get things a bit clearer.

In post 1245, Shadowcat wrote:ZeL1nK2 - scum read (and no, I still haven't had time to reread the thread to dig up the detail but that doesn't affect my read, it just means I can't explain it to you yet).

There are a few others that can be found in their ISO.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1607 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:34 pm

~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1608 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:36 pm

In post 1605, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I don't mind mala's posts but, no offense, the reads lack depth. I am fine with the elaboration on the Loki read, though.

It's way more elaborate than what half the playerlist has provided to be fair.
~Sakura

notscience · Post Post #1609 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:39 pm

In post 1601, White Narcissus wrote:
In post 1599, notscience wrote:And you're not chill enough to remember who did it first the last time it happened.

Who did what first
~Sakura

Comparing you to wisdom

Ankamius · Post Post #1610 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:39 pm

Okay, so what do you think of the elaboration itself and does it affect how you see those posts?

White Narcissus · Post Post #1611 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:45 pm

In post 1610, Ankamius wrote:Okay, so what do you think of the elaboration itself and does it affect how you see those posts?

Well her explanation does make sense, I guess i just had an issue with their defensive play probably. What do you think of what I said about WP?
~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #1612 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:51 pm

Guys we have 3 hours until the next tick. I'm happy to lynch Skold now since nobody wants to lynch ZZZX and just call it a day unless we wanna wait another 48 hours.

Phoneposting on lunch break, sorry I'll be back to make a proper post very soon, I have been reading.

notscience · Post Post #1613 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:55 pm

VOTE: skold

White Narcissus · Post Post #1614 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:56 pm

In post 1612, Mikazuki wrote:I'm happy to lynch Skold now since nobody wants to lynch ZZZX and just call it a day unless we wanna wait another 48 hours.

Do you not have any other scumreads aside of those 2? What do you think of WP?
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1615 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:58 pm

Wait, wait, wait, wait what in the world? You're happy to Lynch Skold despite you thinking ZZZX was the scummier of the whole interaction they both had there? Do you think that was scum theatre?
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1616 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:59 pm

And yes I know, deadline and stuff, but i for one wouldn't lynch a townread even as compromise... So i probably wont join you on Skold.
~Sakura

Ankamius · Post Post #1617 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:00 pm

I actually didn't even notice that WP was almost completely absent until you pointed it out.

I'd at the very least like to know where he stands on Shadowcat after all this talk has happened.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1618 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:00 pm

Oh wait, we still have 1 day, 3 hours, don't scare me like that u.u
~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #1619 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:00 pm

Did you even read my post? Nobody seems to be scumreading ZZZX except me and I believe scumskold over scumshadowcat and if we want a lynch in the next 3 hours then it's gonna be one of those 2. Deadline is not for days though so we can always just keep going.

I also am concerned with WP

White Narcissus · Post Post #1620 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:01 pm

In post 1617, Ankamius wrote:I actually didn't even notice that WP was almost completely absent until you pointed it out.

I'd at the very least like to know where he stands on Shadowcat after all this talk has happened.

Well he was defending them as town, dissapeared for 2 real life days (again) and only appeared again to pvote them, and then dissapeared again.
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1621 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:02 pm

In post 1619, Mikazuki wrote:Did you even read my post? Nobody seems to be scumreading ZZZX except me and I believe scumskold over scumshadowcat and if we want a lynch in the next 3 hours then it's gonna be one of those 2. Deadline is not for days though so we can always just keep going.

I also am concerned with WP

We had a 24 hour extension due to replacement...
~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #1622 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:02 pm

This deadline and ticks thing keeps messing me up, sorry. I'll be back in a bit.

Pieguyn is the next tick in 1 day 3 hours? Just to confirm.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1623 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:04 pm

In post 1622, Mikazuki wrote:This deadline and ticks thing keeps messing me up, sorry. I'll be back in a bit.

Pieguyn is the next tick in 1 day 3 hours? Just to confirm.

You even acknowledged it before...

In post 1523, Mikazuki wrote:I thought that meant the extra time at the end of the day, oops.

In post 1522, ZeL1nK2 wrote:
In post 1515, Mikazuki wrote:
In post 1393, pieguyn wrote:
if I need to extend the deadline, the darkness timer is paused until the "extra" time runs out.

Maybe my English is just that bad, I took this to mean that it's still darkness increasing every 48 hours regardless of extensions, until we pass the original 10 day deadline, and then the darkness is delayed.

I cut out the unnecessary stuff. It says when a deadline extension happens, the darkness timer is paused until the extended time is run through.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1624 (ISO) » Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:05 pm

In post 1622, Mikazuki wrote:This deadline and ticks thing keeps messing me up, sorry. I'll be back in a bit.

Pieguyn is the next tick in 1 day 3 hours? Just to confirm.

Easy, just look at the latest vote count and check how long until it reaches the "4 days remaining" tick