Mini 1653: A Game of Pokes - game over

[Aristophanes]

Spoiler: Oka Iso

Posts 1-6 -- exclusively short posts telling Kelbris his claim was wrong and he's scum.
Posts 7-14 -- basically void of content and hung up on Massive's vote on him.
Posts 15-17 -- back to Kelbris pushbased on...yep, claim.
Posts 18-21 -- walling with Monkey. This section features and Omgus and a misunderstanding where it looks like Monkey said he'd voted Viking but hadn't.
Posts 22-24 -- stuck on miswording which wasn't even that bad. A simple misunderstanding.
Posts 25-30 -- case for Kelbris still only claim. Quotes walls to say one line (stahp!). And game theory with Kelbris.
Post 31-- actually possibly helpful question to Slandarr. No follow-up.
Posts 32-42 -- just more Kelbris/Monkey flip flop. This section also features a VT claim and some good old AtE about giving up and self-hammering because fuck defending myself any more (which he hasn't really done much of imo).
DAY 2
Posts 43-50 (rest of Iso) -- votes Kelbris then Fish. Fish is another badly supported vote (he flew under the radar and was tunnelled by Slandarr). Unvote follows.

Tl;dr version.
Oka is a content void.
Oka has bad scumhunting based on nothing. Has done this on 3 people (Kelbris, Monkey, and Fish)
Oka really wants to look active/helpful but doesn't.
These, plus other fun tidbits, can be found above.

Oh, and I mentioned the counterwagon, right?

Yep, Oka is scummy.
Vote with me!

-------------

Why was Slandarr a surprising kill to me?
In most games I have played a very null target is chosen for a D1 kill. Lets scum coast a while and gives town less to analyse.
What it means I have to think about more. Need to reread him and stuff.

[OkaPoka]

whatever.

[Aristophanes]

whatever.

Id be happy to engage with you.
Please refute me, I will then respond.

This is what I saw in Iso form.
If I am wrong due to misinterpretations, context, etc please fill me in.

Just saying "whatever" doesn't do either of us much good, does it?

[OkaPoka]

1. i am
2. i have my scumpool
3. thats false

[Aristophanes]

1. i am
2. i have my scumpool
3. thats false

Okay...
1. Are you actually agreeing? I feel like I should read sarcasm and am unsure.
2. Well, I appreciate having a scumpool, but does that mean you should push cases on them based on what I (for one) see as being not even close to enough for a case? (If I am offbase on that and otherw tell me so I will accept that I am wrong I guess).
3. I suppose that's based on my perception of you. I see activity and long-ass quotes but low content ans non-helpful cases which lack evolution and seem to be blinding you.
Do you believe this is a misrep?

[Formerfish]

Oka, do I have to send you a personal invitation to get you to answer my questions?

Slandaar was scum reading Kelbris day 1 as well, but you left him off your list of to lynch from, why?

Why did you unvote me?

[kelbris]

I would just like to chime in for a sec and say that although Slandaar DID scum-read me (I did actually see that post), he never took it as far as voting for me, I was also just voicing my opinion on the NK, @Massive you say that scum do not kill people because they are right, why not? I see no reason why a scumteam that would be close to losing one of it's members would not POSSIBLY (maybe they did, maybe they did not) kill someone who could potentially stand a threat.

[havingfitz]

I predict when this day ends my vote will be on random Idgit or Oka.

I wish I could have an extra vote for another player.

[Randomnamechange]

This game is boring. There is scum in the people trying to influence people on the nk.

[OkaPoka]

will me flipping town help you guys find scum at all?

[Formerfish]

Vote Oka

I do so hate being ignored.

[OkaPoka]

1. lurking is scary
2. because i am rethinking my scum pool


but still. vote me up and tell me when you guys have a stellar case on me.

[havingfitz]

There is scum in the people trying to influence people on the nk.

Who do you mean and are you voting one of them?

[havingfitz]

vote me up and tell me when you guys have a stellar case on me.

Active lurking is scummy. You're here posting but haven't said anything that contributes to finding scum.p

[OkaPoka]

The only thing i can do is ask why people are voting me.

[Iknal]

Vote Count 2.1
OkaPoka(3): Kelbris, Aristophanes, Formerfish
randomidge(1): havingfitz
vikingfan(1): Randomidget

With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline on 28/4/15 1900 UTC+10.
(expired on 2015-04-28 19:00:00)

[havingfitz]

The only thing i can do is ask why people are voting me.

VOTE: Oka

[OkaPoka]

randommidget vote on me in 3....... 2.......

[massive]

Can we please not speedlynch anyone? We still have 15 days.

[OkaPoka]

i dunno what to do lol/

[Aristophanes]

Oka, I went through your iso and outlined it and why I thought it scummy.
You said 'whatever'.

I asked questions.
You answered shortly and then ignoredy follow-up.

You want to know why people are voting you, I do too.
Rather than just sheep this vote, gimme a case plz guys?
Is it just for active lurking that you are voting Oka?
What are your reasons?

[Formerfish]

I am voting Oka because his play today has been bad. His vote on Kelbris is understandable because he was on him yesterday. The sudden switch to me without explanation was suspect as hell. Then trying to justify it with you weak ass reasoning, I was suspected by Slan and might have gotten investigated so I as scum made the most obvious kill, all while ignoring that Kelbris was another person Slan suspected yet was convientietly left off the suspect list. Then there is the attitude. It reeks of caught scum trying to give as little away as possible.

[vikingfan]

forgot to post here I'm on V/LA due to being on vacation through Tuesday and seeing family, will try and post soon if I have time but since I'm seeing family for the first time since Christmas, RL comes first of course .

[havingfitz]

I'm voting Oka because:

1) the random Idgit effort isn't getting any support.
2) I don't have the patience for his active lurking...whoa is me...what do I do???? crap.

On that note...if you don't know what to do Oka, why play the game?

Try this....read over the game. Look for comments, actions or inconsistencies that you find suspect, and make a case on someone. That is what town should be doing. And once you have a suspect identified keep up the pressure.

Until you can stop being so defensive and of no value to town...you will mist likely continue in your current direction.

[Saul Goode]

I have been prodded.

Acknowledging prod.