Mod Error Mafia [TM2015] - Game Over

TierShift · Post Post #925 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:24 am

Is the cabd wagon still for lurking? I would rather have a somewhat more informative flip day 1.

ISO · Post Post #926 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:26 am

Because he claimed "loldontlynchmetodaybecauserole"

many strong much convince, i know

Iecerint · Post Post #927 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:33 am

In post 926, Cephrir wrote:Because he claimed "loldontlynchmetodaybecauserole"

many strong much convince, i know

Ya this basically.

D2 he'll probably say he was roleblocked and ask for an extra day or whatever, whereupon there will be much hand-wringing.

Magua · Post Post #928 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:38 am

Vote Count 1.31

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Cabd (4): xRECKONERx, Cephrir, Iecerint, notscience
Katsuki (2): Lady Lambdadelta, TierShift
shos (1): Katsuki
notscience (1): shos
T-Bone (1): T-Bone
xRECKONERx (1): Cabd
Cephrir (1): copper223

Not Voting (2): Rhinox, pirate mollie

Deadline for Day 1 is Thursday, April 16th, at 00:00 midnight EDT (site time).
Countdown to deadline:

(expired on 2015-04-15 23:00:00)

Name	Change	Score
Cabd	-	49
Cephrir	-	48
copper223	-	50
Iecerint	-	50
Katsuki	-	49
Lady Lambdadelta	-	52
notscience	-	50
pirate mollie	-	50
Rhinox	-	47
shos	-	53
T-Bone	-	51
TierShift	-	49
xRECKONERx	-	52

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #929 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:53 am

semi back from V/LA. I have 2 exams remaining on Tuesday and on Thursday, and I fly to Seattle on Friday. I will make time to comment on the NS thing and the current state of wagons either tonight or tuesday night, to give time before deadline.

Sorry for the inconvenience folks.

ISO · Post Post #930 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:56 am

Not for lynching today: Iec, mollie, Rhinox, shos

Everyone else is in some state of flux or another for me and it's a little depressing

ISO · Post Post #931 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:56 am

But that makes utility lynching in Cabd/T-Bone sound pretty appealing

ISO · Post Post #932 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:59 am

Yes, let's lynch a player who is barely here and that you've personally had little to none interaction with. And you wonder why you're being scumread...

ISO · Post Post #933 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:01 am

I mean sure, it's great for you, since you'll have very little ties to the mislynch. "guys it was just a utility lynch on an absent player, not my problem don't read into it kthxbye". Yeah I can see that being your Day 2 argument if that were to come to pass.

ISO · Post Post #934 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:03 am

I'm not being scumread

But your response makes me want to lynch you more!

ISO · Post Post #935 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:03 am

Also, nice beetlejuice and deus ex scumread of me!

ISO · Post Post #936 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:07 am

In post 780, Rhinox wrote:In post 708, T-Bone wrote:
I was talking about our little early day interactions (you know the one where you misrepped my vote on copper ;P). Though I attributed Oversoul's reads that you posted as your own. But I hate blanket statements "we think PLAYER's entrance was awful" because that's just lazy.

THAT'S what you're hung up on? I mean I figured my use of the emoticon would be a dead giveaway that I was joking around there. I do think your vote was lazy with or without the explanation you gave, and I'm pretty sure that was the same thing oversoul was referring to when he said your entrance was awful, which is why I agreed with the assessment. But that early in the game all I was trying to say was stop being lazy and play better. I don't get why sharing my team reads, or referring to things we agree with with a "we" pronoun, is lazy. I'm more worried about the players who haven't referenced their team's thoughts at all. Its easy for 1 player as scum to fake appearing to be town. Its a lot harder to fake town on 4 different players' thoughts.

Oh, well I took that as a serious thing coming from you. I believe we were out of 'RVS' at that point.

shos · Post Post #937 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:11 am

In post 931, Cephrir wrote:But that makes utility lynching in Cabd/T-Bone sound pretty appealing

In post 932, T-Bone wrote:Yes, let's lynch a player who is barely here and that you've personally had little to none interaction with. And you wonder why you're being scumread...

so seriously
Tboner didn't say shit in days
then the moment he is mentioned he replies in *THREE* MINUTES

this lurking is waaaay off

VOTE: T-bone

shos · Post Post #938 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:12 am

Also kats is so fucking GAH that I dunno if scum

TierShift · Post Post #939 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:13 am

Why did the wagon on kats dissipate?

shos · Post Post #940 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:19 am

Dunno.
I'm thinking it's a counterwagon to kats, but then again, cabd I think is scum too

ISO · Post Post #941 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:23 am

In post 937, shos wrote:
In post 931, Cephrir wrote:But that makes utility lynching in Cabd/T-Bone sound pretty appealing

In post 932, T-Bone wrote:Yes, let's lynch a player who is barely here and that you've personally had little to none interaction with. And you wonder why you're being scumread...

so seriously
Tboner didn't say shit in days
then the moment he is mentioned he replies in *THREE* MINUTES

this lurking is waaaay off

VOTE: T-bone

Oh man you're right. As soon as I was mentioned I should have stopped reading the thread and wait until people weren't talking about me. That would be the town thing to do right? Oh no? That would actually be the scum thing to do? Holy shit!

I'm not a lurker, I LEGITIMATELY haven't been here, haven't been on the site except to Mod my game real quick. Lurking implies that there is an intentional effort to not post in the game, while still being around elsewhere on the site, which is not the case. So I'm not a fucking lurker. It's the same fucking shit you did in InYuasha that pissed me off, because you kept going "it's a 7-headed hydra that isn't posting SCUM" when it was just fucking ME because my other 6 heads fucking abandoned me, but when you were repeatedly told this you put your fingers in your ears and went "lalalala I'm not listening". You seem to be incapable of understanding what 'alignment-independent' things are.

shos · Post Post #942 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:28 am

...you do realize you were scum that game, yes?

shos · Post Post #943 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:29 am

Also, I don't believe in coincidences, and you coming LITERALLY THREE MINUTES after you're mentiuoned is a thing.

ISO · Post Post #944 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:31 am

I don't think lurking implies intentional lurking

ISO · Post Post #945 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:31 am

@tier: see 926

ISO · Post Post #946 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:33 am

What the does that have to do with anything? if we were town you would have done the same thing because you seem incapable of understanding what alignment-independent things are. The fact that I got abandoned by my heads in that game and was forced to go in alone had nothing to do with my alignment. The fact that I have to do a final and write up a thesis proposal has nothing to do with my alignment this game. Ceph was the Mod, he know how legitimately angry I was. It's fucking stupid when someone makes the argument "he's scum for the way he distributes his activity" because there is no real defense for that, it's a fucking stupid argument to make, and has never ever in the history of mafia ever been alignment relevant.

You literally just said "T-Bone took three minutes to respond so he's scum". So obviously then the town thing to do would have been not to post right? Because that's exactly what you said. Which tells me you have no idea what's going on in this game. I haven't been here and I have a better handle on things than you.

ISO · Post Post #947 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:34 am

When the crutch of your argument is "he posted too soon he's scum, town would not have responded so fast", is the moment when you need to realize you have a stupid argument. This is twice in as many games as you have pulled this shit on me.

shos · Post Post #948 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:40 am

my point is that you saying that my idea is not scum-indicative is kinda weak when the only part you can show it happened was when it caught scum

ISO · Post Post #949 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:49 am

And my point that you don't seem to understand what alignment-independent means. You didn't do dick to catch scum, and you and I both know it. You were suspicious of my slot in that game because we supposedly had 7 heads in the hydra. I could understand in that game that when I repeatedly told you "no, this is a 1-headed hydra" that you could think I was lying. But in retrospect now that you know the truth you have to realize that makes you lucky, not that you had any good reasoning in that game, because the one thing you hung your hat on the most as the reason we were scum wasn't even true. The ONE reason you had wasn't even true. That makes you a broken clock.