mini 1662: Paint the village red

[Unvotable]

Town won't win as long as Slandaar is alive, regardless of his alignment

[RadiantCowbells]

My experience with Slandaar suggests that he is an above average scumhunter.

[bji]

Town won't win as long as Slandaar is alive, regardless of his alignment

That seems like it must be an exaggeration. No way could one person derail a whole team like that. Sounds to me like you have an axe to grind. Also, your opening play here of taking the first non-RVS stance but then failing to back it up with anything convincing doesn't bode well.

[bji]

Basically that.

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

I've never seen anyone go through an entire Day without changing their RVS vote. So I can't imagine why you would have said that. Did you vote Unlynchable because he voted Slandaar?

[Garmr]

I have had good experiences with slandaar sure I might not of been the best player at times but slandaars been consistently good. I also feel that when I'm town he understand the cases I am making as some other players sometimes miss the point. So no we won't have a policy of Slandaar.

[PeaceBringer]

hmm, so we already have vendetta's at work

[Unvotable]

SKOT is in this game aswell? Town has no chance

[PeaceBringer]

SKOT is in this game aswell? Town has no chance

do I know you? I don't recall an unlynchable... I would recall such a SN

[PeaceBringer]

nope, must be an alt hiding, so you have me at a loss...

[Garmr]

SKOT is in this game aswell? Town has no chance

That one I can laugh at because I have had my run ins with skot in the past.

On a another subject I do have a town read on radiantcowbells through. If she does turn out town I can start investigating a possible town tell in future games.

@radiant
What gender pronoun should I use for you he/she/it/they

[BlueBloodedToffee]

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells
Serious vote.

[Garmr]

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells
Serious vote.

Can I ask why you think radiant is scum since it's serious?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Vote parking.

[Garmr]

Vote parking.

I don't really agree with that assessment.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

I'm just going to quote this again for you so you can read it.

My vote doesn't change today = vote parking.

[Garmr]

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

I'm just going to quote this again for you so you can read it.

My vote doesn't change today = vote parking.

I have said the same things as town before sometimes I carry through sometimes I don't. Also if Radiant is showing awareness of his/her/it surroundings and commenting on them and showing that radiant is trying to work out things I'm fine with keeping them around.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

That makes it sound like as long as someone is putting in *effort* they earn a town read from you.

That's pretty weak if that's the case.

[Garmr]

That makes it sound like as long as someone is putting in *effort* they earn a town read from you.

That's pretty weak if that's the case.

Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.

Also scum slip up there's a difference between working things out and trying to look town. Also with lynchs and night kills information is provided player who have provided information are easier to read.

[Garmr]

then again it's coming out of rvs*

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.

This is weird because you both attacked and defended my action in the same sentence.

[Garmr]

Just like vote parking is a weak sauce excuse vote to begin with when It hasn't even been a whole day yet. But then again it's rvs.

This is weird because you both attacked and defended my action in the same sentence.

Not really weird since I just disagree with your reasoning. I'm not really to sure your motives behind it at the moment I'm trying to figure out if your thinking on a simple level or being opportunistic.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Yeah, I wouldn't look too deep into the reasoning for voting somebody on p2.

It's still a legitimate vote though. It's easy for scum to vote park early in a game, watch the game from the sidelines to see what direction it starts to flow in and then make their decision for how they want to proceed from there.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

The 'opportunistic' comment also seems like a buzzword you have just thrown out.

Can you explain how it's opportunistic?

[Garmr]

Yeah, I wouldn't look too deep into the reasoning for voting somebody on p2.

It's still a legitimate vote though. It's easy for scum to vote park early in a game, watch the game from the sidelines to see what direction it starts to flow in and then make their decision for how they want to proceed from there.

Why would scum announce it through they wouldn't want the heat on them. You voting them is a perfect example as why it's also negative for scum. Radiant cowbells optimal as scum would not to announce it and just vote park till latter on in the game. that way you can avoid a lot of this suspicion.

The 'opportunistic' comment also seems like a buzzword you have just thrown out.

Can you explain how it's opportunistic?

It's a easy thoughtless vote that normally people wouldn't question you on.

[Wanderer-nl]

Well then allow me to ask about it since you guys are in such a discussion now it's easily going to be ignored..

Basically that.

There's a fairly decent chance that my vote doesn't change at all today.

Why is that?