OkaPoka wrote:In post 614, OkaPoka wrote:In post 610, Randomnamechange wrote:Tbh there is very little going on today and in my opinion big wagons hrlp generate content.
soooooooooooo...
601
Don't remember. Sorry but I'm legitimately not sure.
OkaPoka wrote:In post 614, OkaPoka wrote:In post 610, Randomnamechange wrote:Tbh there is very little going on today and in my opinion big wagons hrlp generate content.
soooooooooooo...
601
In post 653, Aristophanes wrote:Sorry for lack of stuff. Should be around tomorrow night.
In post 647, Formerfish wrote:I don't think that my votes specifically are based on activity in the way that you are saying. My vote on Oka had reasoning behind it, you could just disagree with those reasons. My vote on Rando is for reasons other than activity as well. You try to make it seem like these are both only attempts at policy lynching slots based on inactivity and a general lack of give a fuck from those slots. I would like to think that the slots are acting in such a way that there are easily seen scum motivations behind their play right now. Who do you have on those wagons voting for policy lynches?
Formerfish wrote:Then there is the attitude. It reeks of caught scum trying to give as little away as possible.
In post 648, Saul Goode wrote:@Wicked - I agree with this statement, fwiw:In post 647, Formerfish wrote:I feel like you are slightly misrepping the reasons people are voting the slots that they are.
For me it's more of a poe thing and strength of Town reads.
In post 655, massive wrote:We now have 9 days to lynch. We're getting hung up attacking non-players and scum are happy to let the conversation die.
Monkeyman576(7): FA_Q2, Wickedestjr, OkaPoka, Saul Goode, vikingfan,Slandaar, havingfitz
Gotta figure that this isn't all town. If Oka is scum, then two of his buddies aren't on his wagon, so there's at least one more scum on Monkey's wagon. Who is it?
In post 645, Wickedestjr wrote:In post 639, vikingfan wrote:In post 636, OkaPoka wrote:viking...
I don't think you ever listed me as scum so your point to havingfitz doesn't make sense.
I haven't, yet, but you've been a main candidate so far and wicked has listed you as a scum candidate before. When I was asking, it wasn't a reflection of how I felt about you, it was a reflection of how wicked felt about you. Make sense?
I have never listed Oka as a scum candidate. In fact, he is one of the few players (if not, the only player) that I have consistently town read.
In post 646, Wickedestjr wrote:Oka is probably town and this recently-formed wagon on random is even worse. Can we vote somebody for somethingotherthan lack of contribution? Istillget the impression that these wagons revolve around contribution-levels. Sorry, but I don't sign up for mafia games to policy lynch. We are currently pursuing null tells that towns chase after in virtuallyevery gamethat I've played... Maybe that's why everyone's so bored. Oka and random clearly don't care about racking up town points. Let's go after something more interesting, like vikingfan's interest in my Monkey-case only after he helped with the mislynch:
In post 565, Wickedestjr wrote:
vikingfan wrote:Because I was A, interested in hearing your responses to massive's questions and B, interested in getting input from the players who haven't chimed in yet on day 2 of the game (now day 3).
You were interested in hearing my response to massive's questions about my vote for Monkey?
Huh...
You didn't seem interested when you made this post:
In post 495, vikingfan wrote:UNVOTE: I can get on board with a monkey lynch, I'm not a fan of the oka wagon or the people on it. VOTE: monkey. Posting from my phone so if this looks strange that's why.
Vote: vikingfan
In post 565, Wickedestjr wrote:In post 543, vikingfan wrote:This I don't understand. If you would have been happy to unvote until Monkey claimed, then why didn't you? you could have easily said that you were waiting until he claimed.
I didn't un-vote because a.) I wasn't expecting havingfitz to hammer and b.) un-voting can be seen as false expression of doubt, even if I make it clear that I'm just waiting for a claim.
vikingfan wrote:Because I was A, interested in hearing your responses to massive's questions and B, interested in getting input from the players who haven't chimed in yet on day 2 of the game (now day 3).
You were interested in hearing my response to massive's questions about my vote for Monkey?
Huh...
You didn't seem interested when you made this post:
In post 495, vikingfan wrote:UNVOTE: I can get on board with a monkey lynch, I'm not a fan of the oka wagon or the people on it. VOTE: monkey. Posting from my phone so if this looks strange that's why.
In post 660, Wickedestjr wrote:In post 655, massive wrote:We now have 9 days to lynch. We're getting hung up attacking non-players and scum are happy to let the conversation die.
Monkeyman576(7): FA_Q2, Wickedestjr, OkaPoka, Saul Goode, vikingfan,Slandaar, havingfitz
Gotta figure that this isn't all town. If Oka is scum, then two of his buddies aren't on his wagon, so there's at least one more scum on Monkey's wagon. Who is it?
What doyouthink?
In post 667, havingfitz wrote:I'm as big a fan of vote analysis as the next guy but what you are suggesting in this post is crap (no offense).
In post 667, havingfitz wrote:Common sense alone dictates there is 1 or more scum on Monkey's wagon. But even so...your conjecture about Oka being scum serving as an indicator that there's at least "one more scum on Monkey's wagon" is of no help, and in fact makes me wonder what your point actually is.
In post 667, havingfitz wrote: You are willing to raise suspicions on the Monkey wagon based on the presumption that Oka is scum...yet you are not voting Oka....and you are not voting anyone in the group (i.e. Monkey's wagon) that the "at least one more" consists of. So you are staying away from the 33% chance or better odds of hitting scum that you bring up and instead go for the 20% or less chance of hitting scum off the Monkey wagon. (25% or less if you discount yourself). Either way, you're opting for the less attractive situation that you yourself are bringing up. And that's not counting the possibility that all presumed three scum could be on Monkey's wagon. And more importantly...it ignores the possibility that Oka is town (I hope not) in which case scum could be anywhere...in any number or either wagon.
In post 667, havingfitz wrote:It is a complete toss up for me between the two of them.
In post 655, massive wrote:Monkeyman576(7): FA_Q2, Wickedestjr, OkaPoka, Saul Goode, vikingfan,Slandaar, havingfitz
Gotta figure that this isn't all town.If Oka is scum, then two of his buddies aren't on his wagon, so there's at least one more scum on Monkey's wagon. Who is it?
In post 659, Wickedestjr wrote:In post 648, Saul Goode wrote:@Wicked - I agree with this statement, fwiw:In post 647, Formerfish wrote:I feel like you are slightly misrepping the reasons people are voting the slots that they are.
For me it's more of a poe thing and strength of Town reads.
I don't think that's enough to put someone at L-1 on day 2.
In post 671, Saul Goode wrote:In post 655, massive wrote:Monkeyman576(7): FA_Q2, Wickedestjr, OkaPoka, Saul Goode, vikingfan,Slandaar, havingfitz
Gotta figure that this isn't all town.If Oka is scum, then two of his buddies aren't on his wagon, so there's at least one more scum on Monkey's wagon. Who is it?
Would you mind explaining the bold? I'm not following you here.
In post 673, massive wrote:Sure. If Oka is scum and there's a viable bandwagon, his buddies aren't going to sit on Oka for towncred in the off-chance he gets lynched -- they're instead going to (at least one) vote for the counterwagon in an attempt to save their buddy. Make sense?