Micro 465: Molla's New Roles Mafia - GAME OVER

House · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:45 am

Spoiler: This Stuff Matters

shos · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:45 am

also paaaaaaaaagetooooooooooooooooooooop

oh shoo you took my pagetop

shos · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:45 am

so basically, House, you show me a post made by YOU, which is a reason to vote SOMEONE ELSE.

House · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:46 am

In post 99, shos wrote:
In post 47, House wrote:*Buzz*

Wrong. I don't think you expected blowback for voting Made of People over their remark.

what blowback?

Mc voted someone
you voted MC asking why he voted him
he quoted you, asking why YOU voted HIM
end of interaction

What blowback? Hmm... the wagon on him, perhaps?

I maintain that McMenno didn't expect to be wagoned for voting Made Of People over their abrasive post. It smacks of newbscum.

shos · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:47 am

Dude, during his last post there was only one vote there.

House · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:48 am

In post 104, shos wrote:Dude, during his last post there was only one vote there.

Yeah, mine. Which is what his terribad response was addressing.

I surprised him by voting him after he attempted to buddy me.

Made of People · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:49 am

In post 89, shos wrote:are you a hydra?

I have this sort of thing to start games out as nonsensical and attention attracting as can be, so that I can actually draw reactions and get the game started. this game is NOT out of RVS, not at all, but hey, I've already got a townread on vonflare from this, so ha.

I think those who are deeply invested in trying to get a read so soon are negligible. scum will more likely lie silent until now, because they need to actually lie for reads, and if they need to start explaining their faulty reads so early, they get into trouble. so here you go, mr mctownie MoP, find all those who haven't committed to a single read so far, and have a ball voting.

p.s
don't forget to tell me who scum are, so I can sheep, yes?

...........ok

i don't agree but ok

and yeah hydra - bins/bulge

shos · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:53 am

In post 105, House wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Dude, during his last post there was only one vote there.

Yeah, mine. Which is what his terribad response was addressing.

I surprised him by voting him after he attempted to buddy me.

ok walk me through this veeeery carefully

McMenny makes a random vote.
you quote him and vote him, asking why he voted.
he ignores you, and asks why YOU voted, clearly because it's RVS and there's no reason to be had.
you think that he responded super badly because he did not expect to be wagoned after casting his vote, while..there's no wagon on him, and he actually didn't respond at all.

so what would you expect a townie to do differently?

BRantz · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:54 am

Shos do you not agree that the way McMenno reacted to House's vote was bad? Why are you trying to turn a reasoned wagon into an RVS one?

shos · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:57 am

In post 108, BRantz wrote:Shos do you not agree that the way McMenno reacted to House's vote was bad? Why are you trying to turn a reasoned wagon into an RVS one?

I disagree, obviously?
he did not react. what's bad in that.

saulres · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:57 am

shos, stop whiteknighting McMenno and let

him

respond. Which he could have done when he was online earlier and posted elsewhere but not here. You know I see that as a scumtell.

In post 81, Made of People wrote:Basically, it should be pretty obvious which one of us is posting.

Not to those of us who don't really know your current styles. If you don't mind signing I'd sure appreciate it.

Made of People · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am

bins is me (lowercase)

Bulge is UpPeRCaSe

shos · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am

VOTE: House

pedit:
saul, you can vote him for lurking, that's a different case. but this bullshit I'm seeing from both House and Bratzpuppet, that is just utter bullshit

House · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:02 pm

In post 112, shos wrote:VOTE: House

pedit:
saul, you can vote him for lurking, that's a different case. but this bullshit I'm seeing from both House and Bratzpuppet, that is just utter bullshit

GG chainsaw!

House · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:03 pm

In post 107, shos wrote:
In post 105, House wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Dude, during his last post there was only one vote there.

Yeah, mine. Which is what his terribad response was addressing.

I surprised him by voting him after he attempted to buddy me.

ok walk me through this veeeery carefully

McMenny makes a random vote.
you quote him and vote him, asking why he voted.
he ignores you, and asks why YOU voted, clearly because it's RVS and there's no reason to be had.
you think that he responded super badly because he did not expect to be wagoned after casting his vote, while..there's no wagon on him, and he actually didn't respond at all.

so what would you expect a townie to do differently?

You have zero reading comprehension if you think the wagon (or ANY SINGLE VOTE ON IT) is RVS.

Your play seems to be matching up with your earlier posts - trollish.

saulres · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:04 pm

shos, I'm not voting him for lurking, I'm voting him for the reason I stated. Am I convinced he's scum? No, but the lurking adds to the possibility he is.

House and BRantz's arguments that we're out of RVS hold water with me. Especially because I exited it 3 posts before I think House did.

shos · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:11 pm

someone needs to explain to me what is his 'reaction' and what is bad in it. off to bed

BRantz · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:16 pm

Instead of responding to the question he was asked. He mocked House for asking it. That is what is scummy about it to me. Also, don't try to strawman my thoughts by calling me a puppet.

Taly · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:38 pm

This is a quick check-in.

Seriously not impressed with shos at the moment, haven't seen much good. 97 - I feel like shos is reducing the significance of the voting against McMenno, but I don't understand why. I agree, it seems a bit scummy.

I'm hesitant to unvote yakko, since this my vote is still RVS - but his entrance was a little weird.

1) Yakko, what do you think about McMeno and the wagon on him?
2) What do you think about how shos is behaving?

shos · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:41 pm

And you ALL seem to think it is scummy to laugh at someone who asks for your vote reasoning on LITERALLY the first page of the game.

This is probably scum lead. Or rather, scum supported, actually.

VOTE: saulres

McMenno · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:57 pm

In post 110, saulres wrote:shos, stop whiteknighting McMenno and let
him
respond. Which he could have done when he was online earlier and posted elsewhere but not here. You know I see that as a scumtell.

what if I don't have enough time to respond to every game?

I feel like my vote on MoP is not productive.

UNVOTE: MoP

I should keep a tally on when my wagon is the first one to form.

House · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:25 pm

In post 120, McMenno wrote:
In post 110, saulres wrote:shos, stop whiteknighting McMenno and let
him
respond. Which he could have done when he was online earlier and posted elsewhere but not here. You know I see that as a scumtell.

what if I don't have enough time to respond to every game?

If you don't have time to respond to a game, you shouldn't be in it.

shos · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:45 pm

In post 119, shos wrote:And you ALL seem to think it is scummy to laugh at someone who asks for your vote reasoning on LITERALLY the first page of the game.

This should be a queation if it wasnt obvious

vonflare · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 1:00 am

If SHOS or mcneno flip scum, the other looks pretty scummy as well.

shos · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 2:20 am

Lolk w/e.

I still need answers.
Why is mocking that question on page 1 of a game scummy by THREE PEOPLE?