Paradise Lost - [Game Over]

Katsuki · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:24 am

In post 322, lalaladucks wrote:

In post 294, Katsuki wrote:
In post 286, lalaladucks wrote:

Lastly, how is my play "pro-scum" thus far?

Encouraging confusion and discord and rather than trying to sort things out...

How so?

Uh, do you think you aren't confusing? Because reading your posts scrambles my brain up a bit.

Spoiler: how?
In post 33, Katsuki wrote:
Lets lynch AA first, then I will discuss what our optimal strat this game is.

Insistence on lynching apparent random vote.

In post 35, Katsuki wrote:After AA thanks.

We've got one lynch to burn.

Again.

In post 72, Katsuki wrote:lalalalalala, muffin dislikes me because cupcakes are clearly superior and I stole this scummy from him

Idk what "scummy" you stole from him - is a "scummy" a noun?

In post 83, Katsuki wrote:
p sure I have your gender correct.

Let's make a bet - if you're a dude, you get to chop off your dick.

In post 103, Katsuki wrote:@RC: I may have stuck my foot in your mouth but I fail to see how I stuck it in mine.

and he;s clearly scum

This definitely doesn't clear anything up. It does conjure up strange mental images.

In post 215, Katsuki wrote:
also why does this feel like an everyone try their best moi inpersonation game?

You introduced this. I'm just a philistine who didn't understand the reference.

In post 251, Katsuki wrote:
By moi I meant MagnaofIncompetence.

Well that just explains everything.
(sarcasm)

In post 252, Katsuki wrote:Can we turbolynch AA already so that I can discuss what the optimal townstrat is this game???

In post 255, Katsuki wrote:
In post 253, SXTLHGaiden wrote:i'm not sure if you explained it already, but would you mind explaining why you want to turbo lynch aa?

because hes scum

Such legitimate reason. Many explain. Much wow.

None of those points demonstrated the

"encouragement of confusion and discord"

.

By Scummy, I meant this award I have over my head. We borrowed from the Grammies, and turned it into Scummies, with the singular term being a 'scummy'. I can see why that was confusing for you.

Still, you have yet to demonstrate how I'm being pro-scum. Assuming my posts make perfect sense to others, and under the assumption that you too understood my posting, would you still say I'm scum?

Katsuki · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:25 am

In post 329, ArcAngel9 wrote:Katsuki - Can you please stop this nonsense. You been pushing to lynch me for no reason. this isn't fair. You been extremely rude, unfair and unethical towards me so far. I trying to calm and play quietly but you're not doing any effort. I would appreciate if you stop addressing me in wrong gender, If you stop calling me scum without reason. Thank you.

^scum posting

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:45 am

In post 351, Katsuki wrote:
In post 329, ArcAngel9 wrote:Katsuki - Can you please stop this nonsense. You been pushing to lynch me for no reason. this isn't fair. You been extremely rude, unfair and unethical towards me so far. I trying to calm and play quietly but you're not doing any effort. I would appreciate if you stop addressing me in wrong gender, If you stop calling me scum without reason. Thank you.

^scum posting

None of your allegations have proof nor make sense. Can you play little sensible? If you want to continue to bully me in this way.. I rather prefer to be lynched becuz i can't keep up this nonsense rest of this game.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:47 am

massive - why you think i am scum?

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:01 am

In post 327, lalaladucks wrote:Gaiden, do you still want to execute the No Lynch plan?
Also, who are you finding suspicious at this point?

yes.
As a hyper paranoid person, everyone.

Katsuki · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:09 am

In post 352, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 351, Katsuki wrote:
In post 329, ArcAngel9 wrote:Katsuki - Can you please stop this nonsense. You been pushing to lynch me for no reason. this isn't fair. You been extremely rude, unfair and unethical towards me so far. I trying to calm and play quietly but you're not doing any effort. I would appreciate if you stop addressing me in wrong gender, If you stop calling me scum without reason. Thank you.

^scum posting

None of your allegations have proof nor make sense. Can you play little sensible? If you want to continue to bully me in this way.. I rather prefer to be lynched becuz i can't keep up this nonsense rest of this game.

^more scum posting

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:11 am

^ I am going to pretend that you don't exist in this game because you're not hurting me but also this game. And moving forward, I will be out from the games you're /in. Good bye and have some peace Katsuki.

Katsuki · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:20 am

I'm sorry that you feel you're being caught for the wrong reasons?

Tere · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:30 am

Can one or preferably both of you two explain if there's some unfinished business between you, because this is really distracting! And then preferably can it if you can and move on.

Katsuki, forget AA exists for a moment. What are your thoughts on other folk in the game?

Katsuki · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:56 am

Not really. AAs probably just upset that hes caught scum.

and what do you mean there are other folks in this game?

Tere · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:06 am

That's not helpful. Harumph.

Tere · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:06 am

Katsuki are you always this much of a troll?

Glass · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:07 am

Im back, catching up now.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:08 am

In post 321, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You and Elbirn need to shut yourselves in a retreat for a weekend and work your problems out because A) I agree, I don't see why he thought you were buddying/defending hm and B) Your insinuation that he lied about being paranoid of buddying is confusing to say the least. You going back and forth with him = dread for the town. Come vote Lufan instead.

VOTE: Lufan

While my townread on lufan has so much as dissapearead since the start of the game, i'm not really enthusiastic about voting in a wagon 2 of my scumreads are voting in.

In post 325, FakeGod wrote:grapes [1] - ArcAngel9
Sakura Hana [2] - grapes, zMuffinMan

No Lynch [1] - SXTLHGaiden

Not Voting [1] - Tere

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch
.

Deadline is April 24, 2015, at Noon PST.
Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2015-04-24 14:00:00)

You guy need to start consolidating onto other wagons tbh, we don't have that much time. I wouldn't mind lynching AA9 mostly due to her lack of doing anything except chainsawing muffin and responding to only bits directed at her. I don't like how Gaiden keeps pushing No Lynch, it seems a lot unlike him and it worries me because he's had no issue voting for people like ever, regardless of mechanics.

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:14 am

In post 363, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 321, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You and Elbirn need to shut yourselves in a retreat for a weekend and work your problems out because A) I agree, I don't see why he thought you were buddying/defending hm and B) Your insinuation that he lied about being paranoid of buddying is confusing to say the least. You going back and forth with him = dread for the town. Come vote Lufan instead.

VOTE: Lufan

While my townread on lufan has so much as dissapearead since the start of the game, i'm not really enthusiastic about voting in a wagon 2 of my scumreads are voting in.

In post 325, FakeGod wrote:grapes [1] - ArcAngel9
Sakura Hana [2] - grapes, zMuffinMan

No Lynch [1] - SXTLHGaiden

Not Voting [1] - Tere

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch
.

Deadline is April 24, 2015, at Noon PST.
Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2015-04-24 14:00:00)

You guy need to start consolidating onto other wagons tbh, we don't have that much time. I wouldn't mind lynching AA9 mostly due to her lack of doing anything except chainsawing muffin and responding to only bits directed at her. I don't like how Gaiden keeps pushing No Lynch, it seems a lot unlike him and it worries me because he's had no issue voting for people like ever, regardless of mechanics.

Something few people know about me. I really enjoy playing hateful strategies in games. Especially where I get to negate a wincon of my opponent.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:16 am

In post 364, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Something few people know about me. I really enjoy playing hateful strategies in games. Especially where I get to negate a wincon of my opponent.

Except i don't see it happening so you're not negating their wincon anyways unless everyone else follows you, while it does however serve as a way to masquerade your reads because you don't have to be accounted for any mislynches.

Equinox · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:00 am

In post 330, ArcAngel9 wrote:I have already responded to this issue. I was mistaken about lalalala vote. I read her unvote as vote.. it was huge miscommunication from my side.

Wrong question. There were already 3 votes on 3 different people at the time you made your RVS vote on grapes in post 10, and one of those votes was explicitly not random. Why did you pick grapes to bandwagon out of those 3 votes? It seemed like you were trying to elongate RVS.

In post 328, ArcAngel9 wrote:its not like grape is dying. I still haven't have strong scummy read to move my vote yet.

We have 3 days to deadline. What are your reads? How strong does a scum read have to be before you vote?

In post 354, SXTLHGaiden wrote:yes.
As a hyper paranoid person, everyone.

What do you think of the consensus opposition to your No Lynch plan?

Sakura Hana seems to be getting into battles of semantics with everyone with whom she comes into contact: first Elbirn, now Albert B. Rampage. Does anyone know if this is her usual behavior?

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:11 am

I understand it. Which is why i've opted toward a more friendly "No lynch D1" plan.

Equinox · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:13 am

In post 367, SXTLHGaiden wrote:I understand it. Which is why i've opted toward a more friendly "No lynch D1" plan.

Let's say we go with your plan to not lynch on Day 1. Who do you think the Angel should be shooting on Night 1? Assume that the Angel has many bullets.

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:23 am

Well, given the fact that my plan was initially rejected and thus content was produced, Angel should shoot biggest scum read.
I don't trust my reads (lol gaiden having reads) so i can't advise on any particular player.
At worst, angel hits a townie and now has the ability to communicate with that townie and the other dead townie that scum kills.
Otherwise, the angel will have to make tradeoffs of "killing a townie raises the Defcon level"

Tere · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:28 am

I could be up for that, I think.

Tere · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:29 am

I should probably go reread the discussion you and Muffin and others had about it at the start though.

Equinox · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:31 am

In post 369, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Well, given the fact that my plan was initially rejected and thus content was produced, Angel should shoot biggest scum read.
I don't trust my reads (lol gaiden having reads) so i can't advise on any particular player.
At worst, angel hits a townie and now has the ability to communicate with that townie and the other dead townie that scum kills.
Otherwise, the angel will have to make tradeoffs of "killing a townie raises the Defcon level"

What reads do you have, anyway? Also, how come you don't trust your reads?

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:36 am

Well, Sakura not auto townreading me is concerning. Something something 100% read rate to date.
I don't trust my reads since half the time when i have a burning need to lynch someone, they tend to be town. I blame all the conf bias.

Elbirn · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:40 am

Yeah there's a lot I want to comment on and not enough time to do it, for now I'd like to say on the topic of No lynching: I'm against it. I don't think having sinless townies is some kind of gamebreaking strategy, and I don't know that having lots of townies that can communicate with angel is that much of a benefit. I'd rather keep a position of town making 2/3 of the kills, rather than scum having 1/2 of the kills.

So if you could all just pile up on the Lufan wagon, that'd be swelllllll.