Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

Ankamius · Post Post #2125 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:58 am

Actually I just took my two scumreads from before my V/LA and looked to see if they fit together as a team, but whatever floats your boat I guess.

Mikazuki · Post Post #2126 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:01 am

Hate to burst your bubble but when I fullclaim it will pretty much clear me as town if you consider my role in relation to the game setup.

I was joking about opposing playstyles with Anka earlier on but this is just ridiculous.

PEdit: Morishige Sakutaro for me

Mikazuki · Post Post #2127 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:03 am

In post 2124, Titus wrote:Ank, stop fitting things to theories. Fit theories to things. I would love to scumread you Atm. That's not where the facts are. Your entire analysis presupposes I am scum.

Why is this a problem?

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #2128 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:04 am

Flavor: Kibiki Kou
Does anyone have the flavor claims listed out anywhere?

Mikazuki · Post Post #2129 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:07 am

Satoshi - Shadowcat
Naomi - Thorki
Yoshiki - I assume Zelink probably
Ayumi - WN
Yuka - 4nx
Seiko - Taly
Mayu - Lufan
Sakutaro - Mika
Yui - ZZZX
Kurosaki - Skold
Naho - Anka
Yuuya - Titus
Ghost - NS
Kibiki - Gaiden

Titus · Post Post #2130 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:45 am

In post 2127, Mikazuki wrote:
In post 2124, Titus wrote:Ank, stop fitting things to theories. Fit theories to things. I would love to scumread you Atm. That's not where the facts are. Your entire analysis presupposes I am scum.

Why is this a problem?

Fitting facts to theories leads to bad conclusions usually if the theory is wrong.

By fitting theories to facts, it is a stronger analysis that permits mind changing with new evidence.

Mikazuki · Post Post #2131 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:48 am

But if he's scumreading certain people then it makes sense to use that as a starting point for a theory.

Titus · Post Post #2132 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 7:54 am

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

There you go. He's starting from the conclusion Titus is scum to prove I am scum.

Ankamius · Post Post #2133 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:26 am

I did that?

4nxi3ty · Post Post #2134 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:15 am

I want a titus or gaiden flip to confirm I got this puzzle solved

I'll be back in about two hours to check to change vote to either but after that my vote stays cause I'm not sure If I'll be able to make it online.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2135 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:16 am

In post 2121, Ankamius wrote:
Ankamius

notscience

4nxi3ty

ZZZX

SXTLHGaiden
Mikazuki
Titus
ZeL1nK2

Why is ZZZX green?

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2136 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:18 am

In post 2124, Titus wrote:I will try to be on later today. Busy work schedule.

Ank, stop fitting things to theories. Fit theories to things. I would love to scumread you Atm. That's not where the facts are. Your entire analysis presupposes I am scum.

Why are you voting 4nxi3ty?

Who do you think is scum?

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2137 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:24 am

Whatever. The general opinion seems to be headed towards a Titus lynch today and I doubt any other lynch is going to happen so it's pretty much either that or no lynch. Or possibly ZZZX but there are enough people not wanting that that it seems kind of pointless to try at the moment.

I don't really think WP looked scummy via play. I don't have high hopes of a Titus lynch resulting in a scum flip. But I would probably vote it just to achieve a lynch, maybe.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2138 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:27 am

Though, functionally, no lynch (where Titus uses the "vig" shot on ZZZX) and lynching Titus achieve the same thing - the only difference is whether or not one of them is scum.

I can somewhat sympathise with 4nxi3ty's desire to just see the Titus flip to know what it is, though.

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2139 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:43 am

Vote: ZZZX

Just going to drop this now.

I don't think ZZZX is town, really. I don't remember the last time he gave reads and I don't even remember liking them when he gave them.

I'll be around to switch as necessary, I guess.

Titus · Post Post #2140 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:07 pm

In post 2136, ZeL1nK2 wrote:
In post 2124, Titus wrote:I will try to be on later today. Busy work schedule.

Ank, stop fitting things to theories. Fit theories to things. I would love to scumread you Atm. That's not where the facts are. Your entire analysis presupposes I am scum.

Why are you voting 4nxi3ty?

Who do you think is scum?

I think scum are in ZZZX, 4nxi3ty and NS.

NS is risky becausehe's scum or the one guy we should never lynch. ZZZX is my vig shot. That leaves 4xity.

pieguyn · Post Post #2141 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:33 pm

votecount 4.5

Titus (2) - notscience, 4nxi3ty
ZZZX (2) - SXTLHGaiden, ZeL1nK2

4nxi3ty (1) - Titus

Not voting (4) - Ankamius, ZZZX, Mikazuki

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch. Deadline is April 27, 20:00 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2015-04-27 20:00:00).

pieguyn · Post Post #2142 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:34 pm

notscience has been prodded.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #2143 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:56 pm

sahhhhwwweeeeeet no lynch going on up in here

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #2144 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:03 pm

Well this day has been disappointing overall so that would be a fitting end for it

Mikazuki · Post Post #2145 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:08 pm

Well I still want to lynch 4nx but that's not happening. If ZZZX is dying regardless I'd rather just lynch him than risk nothing but a nk tonight.

VOTE: ZZZX

Titus · Post Post #2146 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:25 pm

VOTE: Zzzx

Titus · Post Post #2147 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:26 pm

Will vig 4ity if we lynch ZZZx.

pieguyn · Post Post #2148 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:29 pm

votecount 4.6

ZZZX (4) - SXTLHGaiden, ZeL1nK2, Mikazuki, Titus

Titus (2) - notscience, 4nxi3ty

Not voting (2) - Ankamius, ZZZX

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch. Deadline is April 27, 20:00 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2015-04-27 20:00:00).

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #2149 (ISO) » Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:34 pm

UNVOTE:
i will be around to revote if needed.