In post 1411, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 510, FA_Q2 wrote:
Not only can you but you should. However, if they are the same thoughts you have been giving then don’t bother – BBT was spot on when he called you out for not taking a stance on anyone. You continue this trend in every post you make.
You are not posting thoughts that are useful when you state this person could be scum or they could be town. That is pretty well established already – tell us who you think is scum and WHY.
I can go with this lynch today I think. I will vote later though if it looks as though this is the lynch for today.
I would prefer RMM though.
321 was REALLY bad and that has been beaten to death.
In post 357, RationalMadman wrote:I genuinely cannot find a single townslip or scumslip or anything form anyone. This is unusual for me.
Nothing.
Then:
In post 358, RationalMadman wrote:Plotinus' attitude, however, is what I call 'over the top' style of scum-play. The typical tryhard scum attitude. Overdoes any explanation etc.
And
In post 359, RationalMadman wrote:But then again tryhards can be VERY useful town members so I really am struggling here.
Takes a stance and then runs from it in the very next post. More nothing.
And tops it off with:
Really! No issue with players joining wagons on scummy players but at least have a better reason than because everyone else is doing It at the time.
This runs from a stance much more than Papi does, contributes less and has posted 2 things that make me really think he is scum – runs to a PL and jumps on the first available wagon that might get a lynch without bothering to add any thoughts or agree with anything. Just states yay for bandwagons. Wth…
I still read flubber as slightly scummy but he is not as scummy as these 2. I don’t really agree with the bella scum read, she is null for me. This is mostly based on the last game I played with town bella – the style just seems similar IMHO. Will look harder at bella when I have more time to.
This is an interesting post from FA. Where did your suspicion of Flubber go?
You read Flubber as slightly scummy - yet you started D2 sounding pretty convinced that you thought Flubber was scum;
In post 896, FA_Q2 wrote:
Really because I think that flubber was BLATANTLY scum. Much more than even papi IMHO.
Yes, one mafia and one sk.
There are a few things not adding up here. Your latest stated read on Flubber was 'slightly scummy', this attempt to make your read stronger appear stronger than what it was is a push for town cred I believe.
You then state you will join the lynch (Papi's lynch) if it's the lynch for the Day. But, you would much prefer to lynch RMM instead. Then you joined the RMM wagon. Can you explain your thought process here? Why did RMM suddenly become so scummy? You had posted after 3 of his posts that you quoted you had a problem with, why did you not address the issue sooner?
I think you saw RMM as a good opportunity to stop bussing and push a potential counter-wagon to Papi.
VOTE: FA
It was still there. I was the only one pushing flubber and that wagon gained absolutely no traction whatsoever so I moved on.
What did you expect? I addressed the issue when I had to go looking for other scum suspects and found RMM rather scummy.
