Open 598: GAME OVER

[Green Crayons]

Jesus fuck

"Jesus, fuck"

not "Jesus fuck"

Gross.

[Persivul]

"But you said that she did," where the "did" was referring to "suspecting players because of their low post content," not whether or not Newbie ever

said

she was suspecting players because of their low effort.

I'm not a mind reader. If this was your intent, why not just admit that the wording was sloppy, rather than getting all defensive?

You're (wrongly) arguing a pedantic point about grammar,

Look at what I bolded. My interpretation is correct.

when it's clear that I am and have been saying you made up

I didn't make it up, I observed it. Post counts are made easily available for a reason(s).

a basis for Newbie's suspicions (low effort) and then attacked that made up basis.

Yes, I attacked the observed basis, got a dodgy response, and now you're unwilling to accept those facts.

[Green Crayons]

Your observation was that Newbie voted low count voters.

You then made up the basis of Newbie's vote - that it was because they were low count voters.

Two different things.

[lane0168]

I just wanted to interject to say that I voted ygs because they weremy biggest scum read. There's no reason I didn't vote ika. Back on page 1 or 2

[lane0168]

You guys are talking in circles and neither care what the other is saying I think

[Green Crayons]

Probably.

[Persivul]

As I see it, by 445, Newbie was up to 3 votes, and GC was up to 2. I had previously been at 3, but dropped to none, and hadn't posted in a while. So, in 447, 2-vote asks 3-vote, "What do you think of Persiv, Newbie?" It was a pretty obvious play to move suspicion back to someone who wasn't responding. Once I made an IMO reasonable defense, though, GC still wouldn't let it go. I'm not sure if that's just personal stubbornness or if there's more to it.

[Newbie]

So, I’m going to take my vote off him and move it to Newbie, based on the arguments above.

VOTE: Newbie

ROFL. And what arguments are that?

[Persivul]

LMAO. All of the sudden the other half of the tag team shows up. (Not that I'm saying GC is scum, just that you two had common personal interests in targeting me.)

[Newbie]

My lynch is pretty much based on bullshit reasoning. How can GC get away with making a whole case against Persivul while still having his vote on me because "anti and BB said so" (and before that, he was reading me as town).

How do you get me aloofness from my posts but don't notice anything wrong with this? Wtf.

[Newbie]

LMAO. All of the sudden the other half of the tag team shows up. (Not that I'm saying GC is scum, just that you two had common personal interests in targeting me.)

Are you going to answer my question about the arguments against me that oh so compelled you to place a vote? And you don't see GC's actions as scummy?

[Green Crayons]

Yeah, if you're town, my play is probably super frustrating.

Sorry.

[Green Crayons]

Then again, if you're scum my play is also probably super frustrating.

[Antihero]

Newbie never said that she was suspecting players because of their low post content.

no, but that's what i was thinking

the overall point is that they're targets of convenience (as opposed to legit reads). getting hung up on semantics and nitpicking at the wording is absurd

[Persivul]

Are you going to answer my question about the arguments against me

Above means above. Read it.

that oh so compelled you to place a vote?

My reasons aren't terribly compelling, but it's day one. There's only so much to work with, and the vote isn't carved in stone.

And you don't see GC's actions as scummy?

Actually yes, I do. I made the parenthetical because I had been talking about the cons of pre-flip associatives and wanted it understood that I saw you guys as working together for personal reasons. I find him scummier than you now. But again, I'm not implying that you're both scum. I doubt you'd work together so openly against me if you were.

[Antihero]

LMAO. All of the sudden the other half of the tag team shows up. (Not that I'm saying GC is scum, just that you two had common personal interests in targeting me.)

Are you going to answer my question about the arguments against me that oh so compelled you to place a vote? And you don't see GC's actions as scummy?

why are you scumreading sthar?

[Newbie]

So you think there's a better case on Persivul, but you'll let someone who you were reading as town get lynched? And you acknowledge it? Omg.

[Green Crayons]

getting hung up on semantics and nitpicking at the wording is absurd

I agree, but we obviously disagree about who is doing the nitpicking, here.

[Antihero]

yeah, it's you.

bottom line: you're accusing p-thing of a strawman when none exists.

[Green Crayons]

So you think there's a better case on Persivul, but you'll let someone who you were reading as town get lynched? And you acknowledge it? Omg.

You're in my lynch pool.

Accept it.

It's not a matter of which of the folks out of my lynch pool I think is the "best" lynch for today. I'm not really attached to an order, just as long as one of em gets lynched. And quickly. My goodness games take forever.

If you can get a quick wagon on YGS or Persiv, that will actually go through, I'm there. But I'm taking the path of least resistance (to one of the folks in my lynch pool).

[Green Crayons]

yeah, it's you.

bottom line: you're accusing p-thing of a strawman when none exists.

That's not nitpicking.

But disagree, in any event.

[Newbie]

Newbie never said that she was suspecting players because of their low post content.

no, but that's what i was thinking

the overall point is that they're targets of convenience (as opposed to legit reads). getting hung up on semantics and nitpicking at the wording is absurd

How are they targets of convenience? I suspected ika from the beginning. That's why he was the first person outside of RVS that I placed a vote on. I gave my reasoning for Persivul + his recent scummy behavior. It's why I had my vote on him before switching to GC. And GC was/is obviously one of the more active players.

You're reaching, just as Persivul is.

LMAO. All of the sudden the other half of the tag team shows up. (Not that I'm saying GC is scum, just that you two had common personal interests in targeting me.)

Are you going to answer my question about the arguments against me that oh so compelled you to place a vote? And you don't see GC's actions as scummy?

why are you scumreading sthar?

Because his underwhelming performance + his unnecessarily aggressive response to lane concerning lane's vote on him.

[Newbie]

In other words, neither my ika or GC reads had anything to do with low performance. You both just assumed.

[Antihero]

i'm p sure sthar's middle name is "unnecessarily aggressive"

[ika]

In other words, neither my ika or GC reads had anything to do with low performance. You both just assumed.

but assuming thisgs is how you play right?

(ps HI ANTI)