In post 162, BRantz wrote:That post by Kitten says nothing. It is a wall of words that says absolutely nothing. There is no trying to figure out the game there SW. Don't be blinded by it.
FoS: Kitten
I am here droog, whats up?
Well, the words don't say anything by themselves, no. You have to read them. Such is the nature of text.
Judging by this post I'd say you seem pretty set on the idea that
A)SW is town, seeing as you are appealing to her to scumread me.
B) I'm scum. I'd call this OMGUS but I can sort of see the build up to it, though you never voiced it before this post and I cannot for the life of me see the reason for it.
From your point of view:
You are town.
SW is town.
I'm scum.
Enomis or Droog is scum. You are town reading Enomis, so I assume you are saying the scumteam is Droog and I?
I'm really enjoying this new logical approach to the game, so I think I'll do some more thinking.
If I assume Droog is town and we lynch Brantz:
Two situations where town loses:
SW is scum with Droog.
Enomis is scum with Droog.
I'm not considering SW/Droog as a real possibility, because there is no way I'm going to correctly read you both if you are scum. I cannot even rule out a scumteam with you both in it based on those interactions when Droog entered, because Droog was the one that brought up the FoS'ing thing and would know to hide the associative tells.
Hm, that's interesting. Why would Droog bring up the FoSing as scum? Obviously to hide connections between himself and his partner and encourage others to rule out those connections. If he is scum, the first player he chose to do that with was SW. Which means I cannot altogether rule out the possibility that they are scum together. Which sucks.
Well, for now I guess I'll say:
If Droog is scum, SW likely is. This isn't helpful at all.
If SW is scum, Enomis probably isn't, and vice versa.
I'm fairly happy with my townreads on SW and Droog though, tbh. SW could be scum, but if so it is with Brantz so that doesn't matter anyway.