Mini 1674: A Minimalist Text Adventure (Fire's Out)

[Huntress]

I don't have any problem with Sakura or RC's votes on Mala.
Pie confirms her scum read on Mala in 894 and others.
NS reaffirms his scum read on Mala in 901.

In 917 Bulge votes Mala. Bulge had barely mentioned Mala before 749 where he says "I should take a look at Mala and pieguy. Those seem like important reads to have." Then:

If RC isn't happening I'd like to do Mala. Everyone has mentioned it/danced around it but we never got a solid wagon going.

VOTE: Mala

This gives the impression that he had previously been involved in discussion about her, but he hadn't. He then produces a case which boils down to Mala being non-committal. It looks very much like he saw there was support for a Mala-lynch and decided to push it.

Asher's vote in 924 was the one that switched the wagon from a minor to a major one, despite the fact he had been reading Mala as neutral or town.
No problem with Pie's vote as it follows her previous posts on Mala.
NM also barely mentions Mala. He asked Sakura whether something Mala did was scummy for her. Sakura said it wasn't. NM makes no further comment before voting Mala.
As for BBT's vote. That almost deserves a policy vote. He doesn't seem to have had a scumread on Mala either, Athough it's possible I missed it.

Vote: The Bulge

2nd choice would be Asher (partly due to previous stuff), then BBT. Soren is still there too.

[Huntress]

Someone who thought she could read them well?

and who might that be?

I'm not sure who here has played with her a lot but I'm guessing it's quite a few. NS and Pie for a start.

Which reminds me, NS was watching that wagon grow but didn't say anything about it. See 927/928.

[RadiantCowbells]

I'm leaning scum on BBT but realize that with his current flippant GTing he'll be impossible to read.

That said, I'd be willing to lynch him purely on policy.

I see no reason to change votes atm.

[Bins]

your friend cuddles up to you.

she's afraid.

VOTE COUNT 2.2

(0) Asher Kendrell - (0) BlankFace - (3) BlueBloodedToffee - RadiantCowbells, pieguyn, Soren (0) Huntress - (0) Not_Mafia - (0) notscience - (0) pieguyn - (0) RadiantCowbells - (0) H0BBES - (1) Soren - BlueBloodedToffee (1) The Bulge - Huntress (6) not voting - Asher Kendrell, BlankFace, Not_Mafia, notscience, H0BBES, The Bulge *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* with 11 alive , it's 6 to lynch. day 1 deadline: (expired on 2015-06-08 17:09:00) (May 30th) mod notes :

[The Bulge]

I don't have any problem with Sakura or RC's votes on Mala.
Pie confirms her scum read on Mala in 894 and others.
NS reaffirms his scum read on Mala in 901.

In 917 Bulge votes Mala. Bulge had barely mentioned Mala before 749 where he says "I should take a look at Mala and pieguy. Those seem like important reads to have." Then:

If RC isn't happening I'd like to do Mala. Everyone has mentioned it/danced around it but we never got a solid wagon going.

VOTE: Mala

This gives the impression that he had previously been involved in discussion about her, but he hadn't. He then produces a case which boils down to Mala being non-committal. It looks very much like he saw there was support for a Mala-lynch and decided to push it.

Asher's vote in 924 was the one that switched the wagon from a minor to a major one, despite the fact he had been reading Mala as neutral or town.
No problem with Pie's vote as it follows her previous posts on Mala.
NM also barely mentions Mala. He asked Sakura whether something Mala did was scummy for her. Sakura said it wasn't. NM makes no further comment before voting Mala.
As for BBT's vote. That almost deserves a policy vote. He doesn't seem to have had a scumread on Mala either, Athough it's possible I missed it.

Vote: The Bulge

2nd choice would be Asher (partly due to previous stuff), then BBT. Soren is still there too.

You're not looking at the context. Literally my next post. As you mentioned, I said I wanted to go back an read Mala. So I did. Then I voted and realized I hadn't posted since reading Mala's ISO.

[Huntress]

The context was very much the point. You had given no indication that you were scum reading Mala before you voted her in 917 after two people had voted her and two more had said they were willing to do so.

How well do you know Mala's play?

[The Bulge]

That's what I just said. I realized after I voted that I hadn't posted my read on Mala yet. So I posted it in 919.

I've played with Mala a fair bit.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

VOTE: BBT

The hammer was so bad I almost cried.

Why did you wait so long to vote me?

You posted 15 (no exaggeration) times since Daystart and had a chance to vote me then given your reasoning was because of my hammer.

Why have you waited for a wagon to form before voting me?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

In fact, you didn't even mention my hammer in any of your posts.

If my hammer was so bad, why didn't you attack me for it at the start of the Day? Was it because everyone else was ignoring it so you decided to as well? Then, when Pie and RC attacked me for it you thought it would be a good opportunity to jump on despite not mentioning it at all prior to this?

I am gonna throw your scum flip in Pie's face as well. Meta? Fuck meta.

[notscience]

Someone who thought she could read them well?

and who might that be?

I'm not sure who here has played with her a lot but I'm guessing it's quite a few. NS and Pie for a start.

Which reminds me, NS was watching that wagon grow but didn't say anything about it. See 927/928.

I saw it growing yes, but I didn't expect a hammer before I woke up.

[Huntress]

Ok. No problem.

I've played with Mala a fair bit.

Then why claim the first two points in 919 are scum tells for her? And why was it scummy for her to be unsure about many of her Day one reads? Your interpretations of some of those reads put a slant on them that just wasn't there.

[BlankFace]

Hello, H0BBES, welcome to a very strange game.

I've had company all day, going to look at the way that wagon built right now though.

[BlankFace]

@923
Good enough for me, let's just actually do something for once.
VOTE: Malakittens

This vote came after Asher said he was V/LA and frustrated with the game. The 923 reference is to Buldge's iso read of Mala, which I agreed largely with in 819. Weird vote for someone who was walking away from the game.

Pie's vote is backed up pretty sufficiently. Substantial comments against Mala start around 669. Don't disagree with the reasoning all that much. Seems to be backed with a decent bit of meta which I can't confirm though.

Already commented on RC's interaction with Sakura, still don't like the slot but warming up to it a little bit. Still seems pretty blatantly like buddying and an attempt to mislynch and then say "See! I was right, now we do things my way."

I just straight up don't know how to read Not_Mafia. I've been wrong about him before and it was mainly playstyle that led me to think he was scum before. Vote comes pretty easily, but he did ask questions about Mala and her meta.

BBT's hammer is gross.

Sakura was incredibly adamant about Mala. No need to go into that in this post. That's going to take more than surface reading her ISO.

If scum is on the wagon, I'd say it's between RC/AK/BBT. Need to look into AK more. Bulge's 976 is kind of weird too, considering he said he wanted to see the wagon happen but I can understand that he didn't expect a wagon that fast or a hammer that quickly.

Looking into AK in a bit.

[notscience]

90% chance of it being BBT, imo.

[notscience]

Like, that hammer was textbook "hammer someone else so my team doesnt lose someone d1"

[pieguyn]

yo notsci, did you still wanna talk?

[notscience]

I really wanted to talk about Mala.

[pieguyn]

welp

one question really quick: do you think there were any more scum on Mala? if so, who?

[notscience]

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I feel like probably not.

Well, not any that are aligned with bbt

[notscience]

However if there IS it is probably nm

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Soooo, let's all pretend that Soren's jump on the BBT wagon isn't opportunistic. Is that what we're playing?

OK.

[RadiantCowbells]

dw, we'll look at him after you.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Thanks!

[The Bulge]

Like, that hammer was textbook "hammer someone else so my team doesnt lose someone d1"

So you think this is multiball?

Ok. No problem.

I've played with Mala a fair bit.

Then why claim the first two points in 919 are scum tells for her? And why was it scummy for her to be unsure about many of her Day one reads? Your interpretations of some of those reads put a slant on them that just wasn't there.

Fair question. I wasn't thinking of meta, really. I do use meta as a tool, but I'm not observant enough to use it passively. If I want to meta someone I have to actually go back and read past games (depending on how long ago they are, and I haven't played with Mala in a while).

[H0BBES]

Hello, H0BBES, welcome to a very strange game.

I've had company all day, going to look at the way that wagon built right now though.

Thank you! But yes I agree. A very strange game...