Open 596: Mega PopCorn Mafia - Over


User avatar
vonflare
vonflare
doot
User avatar
User avatar
vonflare
doot
doot
Posts: 3093
Joined: January 1, 2014
Location: Blue Gatorade Factory

Post Post #1100 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:35 am

Post by vonflare »

Why is everyone scum reading me?

I would shoot west btw. Case incoming.
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
User avatar
vonflare
vonflare
doot
User avatar
User avatar
vonflare
doot
doot
Posts: 3093
Joined: January 1, 2014
Location: Blue Gatorade Factory

Post Post #1101 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:36 am

Post by vonflare »

Don't shoot me for like, 30 mins and I'll convince you west is a good shot.
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
User avatar
vonflare
vonflare
doot
User avatar
User avatar
vonflare
doot
doot
Posts: 3093
Joined: January 1, 2014
Location: Blue Gatorade Factory

Post Post #1102 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:07 am

Post by vonflare »

West starts the game jumping on the fact that I said "Can we stop the 'shoot meeeeee' shenanigans and get down to scumhunting?". He says that this is scummy becuase "There was a while between the last "shoot me" post and this one". It looks a lot like he was trying to find something to scumread me about. this is a weak case, if not just made-up.

In post 171, West9 wrote:
In post 127, vonflare wrote:Can we stop the 'shoot meeeeee' shenanigans and get down to scumhunting?

There was a while between the last "shoot me" post and this one. Why did you feel like saying this?

In post 190, vonflare wrote:
there were literally minutes between those posts. i was ninjad.

In post 194, West9 wrote:
You were ninjad for the twenty minutes between and ?


In post 196, vonflare wrote:
it felt like we were discussing it at the time that i posted.

In post 202, West9 wrote:
In post 196, vonflare wrote:it felt like we were discussing it at the time that i posted.

So, you weren't ninjad. Why did you say you were ninjad?


In post 204, vonflare wrote:
In post 202, West9 wrote:
In post 196, vonflare wrote:it felt like we were discussing it at the time that i posted.

So, you weren't ninjad. Why did you say you were ninjad?


it was a big storm of posting when the game began, i was ninjad with every post at that point.

its not like im lying about being ninjad... what could i gain from that?


He then jumps on an error I made about one of my posts. I mistakenly said that I was ninja'd, when, in fact, I was not. I explained that that was a mistake on my part, that I misremembered what was happening during the opening of the game, but west still finds a 'reason' to scumread me for it.
In post 208, West9 wrote:
vonflare wrote:
In post 202, West9 wrote:
In post 196, vonflare wrote:it felt like we were discussing it at the time that i posted.

So, you weren't ninjad. Why did you say you were ninjad?


it was a big storm of posting when the game began, i was ninjad with every post at that point.

its not like im lying about being ninjad... what could i gain from that?

That post just read to me as an earlygame attempt to look useful while not being at all useful, and your justification for it doesn't persuade me otherwise. Same with this worthless readlist.

VOTE: Vonflare


Then he votes me for this, as well as my "worthless readlist"

This was the first readlist of the game, and he decides it's "worthless". its better than anything he was doing! he was just tunneling me with a weak case.

Much , much later in the game:

In post 624, West9 wrote:
Vonflare is still the scummiest player.
Vote: Vonflare



with no new reasoning. His only case against me is that I said "lets scumhunt" too late, and my first readslist was "worthless"

which I point out here:
In post 635, vonflare wrote:Lol his entire case against me is "he said 'stop saying shoot me and get down to scumhunting' too late"


then he responds with this:

In post 641, West9 wrote:[quote="In
That's not the whole case:
Readlist was worthless and contributed to the "scum faking useless activity" vibe.
Your response to me asking you a question was an immediate scumread.
Your excuses for that "hey town let's get to work" post were terrible.
Youve clearly been strategically lurking since early D1.



-first readslist of the game, at the start of day 1, is worthless. how do you define the worth of my readslist? I was giving my opinions and gut feelings on the players, and you decide that me sharing my opinions is 'worthless'. Should I not have posted my opinions? Would that have had more 'worth'?

-What? so you are scumreading me because i was scumreading you?

-What does this mean? is he actually implying that i was lying about thinking i was ninja'd? He's just adding random things to the list so that it looks like he has legitimate reasons to scumread me.

-strategically lurking? i post when I can. If i'm not near a computer, I don't post! and, actually, if i's strategically lurking, then
so are you!
I have 60 posts, while you have 41, which is almost 20 more posts then you.

In addition,

In post 664, West9 wrote:

In post 663, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:VOTE: West9

FOR GREATER JUSTICE!

So, now you'd shoot me instead of CB? That was fast.

In post 806, West9 wrote:Quick post to answer pablito's questions:

I know that I have boring townreads, but I've gotten the most genuine scumhunt-y feeling from CB, RC, and Heartless. Like I said, I wouldn't shoot them.

Top scumreads are Vonflare and PN.


Perpetual nonsense votes for west, then west immediately adds PN to his scumreads. weird.

Also, post where west defends max:

In post 369, West9 wrote:
@AA9 - We're getting unofficial vote counts, right? Seems like that hasn't been happening.


Did I ask bad questions about Lucky and Red or is it just that nobody knows them?
More likely to endorse a Lucky shot if those are still the only two candidates.

In post 330, pablito wrote:Just as much as others are suspecting wanderer for not doing scum-hunting, I'm getting Maxwell as being half-assed scum-hunting. Which is why I asked the question of a voting system. If I felt Maxwell was pure town, I'd've wanted Maxwell to actually try to implement something. But I don't get the sense that Maxwell wants that. So prove me wrong Maxwell and force everyone to look at certain players through some type of referendum or focused-voting system.

You lost me here. Are you scumreading everyone who isn't suggesting a voting system? If not, why hold Max up to that standard? Or am I completely misreading this?
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
User avatar
vonflare
vonflare
doot
User avatar
User avatar
vonflare
doot
doot
Posts: 3093
Joined: January 1, 2014
Location: Blue Gatorade Factory

Post Post #1103 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:11 am

Post by vonflare »

mod,
can you fix the quote in the middle of the post above? it should look like this:



Spoiler:
In post 641, West9 wrote:
That's not the whole case:
Readlist was worthless and contributed to the "scum faking useless activity" vibe.
Your response to me asking you a question was an immediate scumread.
Your excuses for that "hey town let's get to work" post were terrible.
Youve clearly been strategically lurking since early D1.



-first readslist of the game, at the start of day 1, is worthless. how do you define the worth of my readslist? I was giving my opinions and gut feelings on the players, and you decide that me sharing my opinions is 'worthless'. Should I not have posted my opinions? Would that have had more 'worth'?

-What? so you are scumreading me because i was scumreading you?

-What does this mean? is he actually implying that i was lying about thinking i was ninja'd? He's just adding random things to the list so that it looks like he has legitimate reasons to scumread me.

-strategically lurking? i post when I can. If i'm not near a computer, I don't post! and, actually, if i's strategically lurking, then
so are you!
I have 60 posts, while you have 41, which is almost 20 more posts then you.

In addition,

In post 664, West9 wrote:

In post 663, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:VOTE: West9

FOR GREATER JUSTICE!

So, now you'd shoot me instead of CB? That was fast.
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1104 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:24 am

Post by Heartless »

west9's recent posting has actually been pretty awesome so i wouldn't recommend that shot
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
vonflare
vonflare
doot
User avatar
User avatar
vonflare
doot
doot
Posts: 3093
Joined: January 1, 2014
Location: Blue Gatorade Factory

Post Post #1105 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:25 am

Post by vonflare »

Well his case on me is terrible
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Flubbernugget
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11751
Joined: June 26, 2014

Post Post #1106 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:45 am

Post by Flubbernugget »

@red what makes one compliment to Pablito scummier than another?
User avatar
Wanderer-nl
Wanderer-nl
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Wanderer-nl
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2013
Joined: March 12, 2015
Location: The country with the many dykes because we are below sealevel (GMT +1)

Post Post #1107 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 3:23 am

Post by Wanderer-nl »

@Vonflare: ok so that's your defense all in one post. I must say that it does look good from a superficial pov, but I can't help but wonder where the rest of your contribution is. I still stand by that you have not done anything but defend yourself or prodge, and now that it looks like you're getting shot you're finally able to make a case on someone. I'm not convinced yet, I want to see reads on other playeers. I want to know how you feel about the do-not-shoot list, how about the shortlist? Got a little more than 'agree' or 'don't agree' for us?
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Flubbernugget
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11751
Joined: June 26, 2014

Post Post #1108 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 3:52 am

Post by Flubbernugget »

That defense was awful and it came after Pablito said he was shifting attention to lurkers
User avatar
West9
West9
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
West9
Goon
Goon
Posts: 772
Joined: December 30, 2014

Post Post #1109 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:35 am

Post by West9 »

It really is an awful defense.

In post 1102, vonflare wrote:West starts the game jumping on the fact that I said "Can we stop the 'shoot meeeeee' shenanigans and get down to scumhunting?". He says that this is scummy becuase "There was a while between the last "shoot me" post and this one". It looks a lot like he was trying to find something to scumread me about. this is a weak case, if not just made-up.

You know, I've been asked about this before, and I answered it:
Spoiler:
In post 312, West9 wrote:
In post 295, julienvonwolfe wrote:My thinking on vonflare is that people are making too much of the ninja kerfuffle, as I can't see how that matters, but whatever.

Here's my perspective on Vonflare: the whole "hey, guys, you should stop asking to be shot and start scumhunting!" comment was really irrelevant at the time he made it, which makes me suspect that he's trying to do a whole "fake town rallying voice" thing (I also get a similar insincere "here, let me help the town get it's act together!" vibe from his readlist).
It is ridiculously scummy and desperate that you didn't include this in your ISO-bomb of me.

In post 1102, vonflare wrote:He then jumps on an error I made about one of my posts. I mistakenly said that I was ninja'd, when, in fact, I was not. I explained that that was a mistake on my part

It was not a mistake, and you did not explain that. You lied because you didn't think I'd check the timing.

In post 1102, vonflare wrote:Then he votes me for this, as well as my "worthless readlist"

This was the first readlist of the game, and he decides it's "worthless". its better than anything he was doing! he was just tunneling me with a weak case.

You know, I've been asked about this before, and I answered it:
Spoiler:
In post 283, West9 wrote:
In post 275, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 208, West9 wrote:That post just read to me as an earlygame attempt to look useful while not being at all useful, and your justification for it doesn't persuade me otherwise. Same with this worthless readlist.


How is that readlist worthless? when most haven't even posted one - which is more worthless than a readlist that is apparently worthless? :neutral:

Because Vonflare himself said it was worthless (). Also, it's not like options are confined "post a readlist" or "don't post a readlist."
It is ridiculously scummy and desperate that you didn't include this in your ISO-bomb of me.
In post 1103, vonflare wrote:
In post 641, West9 wrote:
That's not the whole case:
Readlist was worthless and contributed to the "scum faking useless activity" vibe.
Your response to me asking you a question was an immediate scumread.
Your excuses for that "hey town let's get to work" post were terrible.
Youve clearly been strategically lurking since early D1.



1) first readslist of the game, at the start of day 1, is worthless. how do you define the worth of my readslist? I was giving my opinions and gut feelings on the players, and you decide that me sharing my opinions is 'worthless'. Should I not have posted my opinions? Would that have had more 'worth'?

2)What? so you are scumreading me because i was scumreading you?

3)What does this mean? is he actually implying that i was lying about thinking i was ninja'd? He's just adding random things to the list so that it looks like he has legitimate reasons to scumread me.

4)strategically lurking? i post when I can. If i'm not near a computer, I don't post! and, actually, if i's strategically lurking, then
so are you!
I have 60 posts, while you have 41, which is almost 20 more posts then you.

1) See above.
2) Finally, you find a legitimate thing that I haven't clarified. This point should read "Your response to me asking you a question was an immediate scumread instead of answering the question."
3) You know, I've been asked about this before, and blah blah blah blah blah
Spoiler:
In post 312, West9 wrote:When I questioned him on why he thought it was relevant, he did three things. A) Immediately scumread me B) Said that he was ninjad and C) said that he thought the current discussion was still about the whole "shoot me" thing.

Being ninjad for twenty straight minutes seems false enough, but even if it's true, being ninjad at all doesn't excuse an irrelevant comment, especially when you consider this definition of ninjaing that Nacho gave:
In post 225, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 224, Wanderer-nl wrote:One question: what is 'being ninjad'?

whenever you post and then the forum is like "someone else already posted! would you like to post something else now that you see their post?"

B and C can't coexist as excuses, so I don't think either of them are true.

4) You're being silly.
User avatar
West9
West9
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
West9
Goon
Goon
Posts: 772
Joined: December 30, 2014

Post Post #1110 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:02 am

Post by West9 »

Shit, I missed some things.

In post 1102, vonflare wrote:Much , much later in the game:

In post 624, West9 wrote:
Vonflare is still the scummiest player.
Vote: Vonflare



with no new reasoning. His only case against me is that I said "lets scumhunt" too late, and my first readslist was "worthless"


Did some timeline research.
is when I give a full explanation of my read on you.
is the quote you give, where I provide "no new reasoning."
Now, here are the posts you made in that 310 post interval:
Spoiler:

In post 299, vonflare wrote:Prodge

In post 382, vonflare wrote:I like coyotes 375 and maxwells response in 377, they look town.

Heartless, why do you think maxwell and coyote are scum?

In post 572, vonflare wrote:Hey, I was busy over the long weekend. What did I miss?

In post 573, vonflare wrote:ok victor is the new king.

Who are your scumreads?

In post 580, vonflare wrote:Beetlejuice

In post 583, vonflare wrote:ITS SHOWTIME!

This was the weak shit you "contributed" during that time. Nothing here could possible have made you think "West sure will need to re-evaluate his read on me after I post this!"

In post 1102, vonflare wrote:In addition,

In post 664, West9 wrote:

In post 663, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:VOTE: West9

FOR GREATER JUSTICE!

So, now you'd shoot me instead of CB? That was fast.

In post 806, West9 wrote:Quick post to answer pablito's questions:

I know that I have boring townreads, but I've gotten the most genuine scumhunt-y feeling from CB, RC, and Heartless. Like I said, I wouldn't shoot them.

Top scumreads are Vonflare and PN.


Perpetual nonsense votes for west, then west immediately adds PN to his scumreads. weird.

I
totally
agree with you that context if for pussies, but wow. First of all, the word "immediately" is pretty misleading, given that there were, like, 150 posts in between the two quotes of mine that you present. And also, you completely cut out this exchange to make my "you're voting for me and that's weird" comment look defensive:
Spoiler:
In post 624, West9 wrote:Julian and PN would probably round out my shotlist. I liked Heartless' point on PN, and is bad.

In post 625, West9 wrote:
In post 585, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:WE do hope that the person you want to be shot is on the left.
WE already know who WE will shoot if WE get the gun.

Who?

In post 637, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 625, West9 wrote:
In post 585, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:WE do hope that the person you want to be shot is on the left.
WE already know who WE will shoot if WE get the gun.

Who?

Right now, WE would shoot CB.

In post 641, West9 wrote:
Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 625, West9 wrote:
In post 585, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:WE do hope that the person you want to be shot is on the left.
WE already know who WE will shoot if WE get the gun.

Who?

Right now, WE would shoot CB.

Why? (pedit - ninjad)
And the first quote says a different thing than the latest one. You already know not only that you WOULD shoot him, but also that you WILL shoot him?

In post 662, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 625, West9 wrote:
In post 585, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:WE do hope that the person you want to be shot is on the left.
WE already know who WE will shoot if WE get the gun.

Who?


Other head believes PoE places CB as scum, along with the others listed. WE are definitely thinking OUR scumreads are leaning scum, based off more than PoE. The dreaded Gut reads! WE don't feel our reads are perfect or accurate, since with all the lurking there are interactions WE are not sure of. Plus, WE had to Rush to our explanations! Funniest thing of the day is Gaiden explaining how to spot Associative tells! That guy's got some BRAIN!

In post 663, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:VOTE: West9

FOR GREATER JUSTICE!

In post 664, West9 wrote:
In post 662, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Why is CB being townread, again? look below, where he doesn't clarify the good and the bad he sees in each player.

Yes he does. That post is an update of a previous readslist () and everything that is different in this readlist is cleanly explained.

And if you think he's being townread for shitty reasons, that's fine, but how does that by itself turn into a scumread?

In post 662, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Following the crowd with the Von read first, and then US. I Do like that you initiated discussions with US earlier. But you have settled on the three 'Easiest' targets. All with considerable amount of pressure on them. No bueno!

Buddy, the CROWD has been following ME on this Vonflare scumread, so I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Nice try at a misrep, though.
And I'm not hiding the fact that those other scumreads started from me following the crowd. I like what the crowd has been saying regarding yourself and Julian.

In post 663, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:VOTE: West9

FOR GREATER JUSTICE!

So, now you'd shoot me instead of CB? That was fast.

^This, admittedly, is a skimmed version of the exchange, because I responded to some things they didn't direct at me, but still. The point is that vonflare hates context and that's super lame.


In post 1102, vonflare wrote:
Also, post where west defends max:

In post 369, West9 wrote:
@AA9 - We're getting unofficial vote counts, right? Seems like that hasn't been happening.


Did I ask bad questions about Lucky and Red or is it just that nobody knows them?
More likely to endorse a Lucky shot if those are still the only two candidates.

In post 330, pablito wrote:Just as much as others are suspecting wanderer for not doing scum-hunting, I'm getting Maxwell as being half-assed scum-hunting. Which is why I asked the question of a voting system. If I felt Maxwell was pure town, I'd've wanted Maxwell to actually try to implement something. But I don't get the sense that Maxwell wants that. So prove me wrong Maxwell and force everyone to look at certain players through some type of referendum or focused-voting system.

You lost me here. Are you scumreading everyone who isn't suggesting a voting system? If not, why hold Max up to that standard? Or am I completely misreading this?

Do you have any point to make about this post or...?
User avatar
Kari
Kari
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kari
Goon
Goon
Posts: 170
Joined: May 25, 2015
Location: A really cold place

Post Post #1111 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:13 am

Post by Kari »

vonflare flailing makes me laugh.
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1112 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:22 am

Post by Heartless »

In post 1105, vonflare wrote:Well his case on me is terrible

summarize this game's mechanic in a sentence.
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1113 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:25 am

Post by Heartless »

In post 382, vonflare wrote:I like coyotes 375 and maxwells response in 377, they look town.

Heartless, why do you think maxwell and coyote are scum?

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

:\

:/

:\

yeah, i was thinking about vonflare being such a popular target and that was kinda' bothering me, but there's little things like this that just get me
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
RedCoyote
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8036
Joined: October 19, 2008
Location: Houston, TX

Post Post #1114 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 12:23 pm

Post by RedCoyote »

In post 1113, Heartless wrote:
In post 382, vonflare wrote:I like coyotes 375 and maxwells response in 377, they look town.

Heartless, why do you think maxwell and coyote are scum?

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

:\

:/

:\

yeah, i was thinking about vonflare being such a popular target and that was kinda' bothering me, but there's little things like this that just get me


You guys are so confirmed town. I'm sorry I ever doubted y'all.

Flubber, once again, I have no idea what the heck you are talking about. Are you always so cryptic? Why does everything you say have to be a riddle?
User avatar
Kari
Kari
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Kari
Goon
Goon
Posts: 170
Joined: May 25, 2015
Location: A really cold place

Post Post #1115 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 12:43 pm

Post by Kari »

coyote, are you town? i hope so, bc you seem town.
User avatar
RedCoyote
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8036
Joined: October 19, 2008
Location: Houston, TX

Post Post #1116 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:07 pm

Post by RedCoyote »

You better believe it, darlin.
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1117 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:16 pm

Post by Heartless »

Are you drunk? What a coincidence! I am too! :]
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
RedCoyote
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8036
Joined: October 19, 2008
Location: Houston, TX

Post Post #1118 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:18 pm

Post by RedCoyote »

In post 1117, Heartless wrote:Are you drunk? What a coincidence! I am too! :]


How can you tell? Because I'm posting??? XD
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1119 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:21 pm

Post by Heartless »

Because you said "ya'll," your questions to Flubber are rambling, and you called Kari "darlin'."
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
RedCoyote
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8036
Joined: October 19, 2008
Location: Houston, TX

Post Post #1120 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:25 pm

Post by RedCoyote »

TTH, me and you are going to have to play some more. I think I like you more with every post. <3
User avatar
MonkeyMan576
MonkeyMan576
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MonkeyMan576
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7900
Joined: November 7, 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Post Post #1121 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:27 pm

Post by MonkeyMan576 »

Flirting = Scum:P. Let's get back to scumhunting!
User avatar
Heartless
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Heartless
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6296
Joined: August 8, 2014

Post Post #1122 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:29 pm

Post by Heartless »

:igmeou:
Would you like to start us off then, Monkeyman?
Show
those who are Heartless
once cared so much


Best origin story ever told

TellTaleHeart and Antihero
User avatar
RedCoyote
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
RedCoyote
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8036
Joined: October 19, 2008
Location: Houston, TX

Post Post #1123 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:32 pm

Post by RedCoyote »

No worries, I'm going to be watching Hell's Kitchen here in a few minutes. MM, how about you defend vonflare/Flubber then, hm? I'm trying to get my man pab to shoot these guys... so you calling me scum I take it you like them?
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Flubbernugget
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Flubbernugget
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11751
Joined: June 26, 2014

Post Post #1124 (ISO) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:51 pm

Post by Flubbernugget »

In post 1114, RedCoyote wrote:

Flubber, once again, I have no idea what the heck you are talking about. Are you always so cryptic? Why does everything you say have to be a riddle?

You could have just answered the question. I'd rather have a discussion than a lecture.

The bottom line is if heartless's town reads are expressing a similar behavior as their scum reads then something is wrong. Unless you also believe that I can't put good faith in a gunbearer with differing reads than me, or take heavy stock in meta.

Return to “Completed Open Games”