Mini 1682 - Game Over

Salamence20 · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:53 am

In post 347, Slandaar wrote:So we return to; what was the point you were trying to make?

I dont like anyone on that Wagon not named eagle.

Do you think Anna/Drakc are bussing their buddy or wagoning town based on their lazy votes?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:53 am

See, this is the kind of nonsense that makes me want to lynch LQ.

FA_Q2 · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:57 am

In post 348, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 344, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 341, LicketyQuickety wrote:I've done this before but to no avail, but I think it might be interesting to see where this goes:

VOTE: Salamence

Didnt know you scumread me.

I consider this an OMGUS

I'm not scumreading you.

You are voting someone that you do not think is scum?

That makes absolutely zero sense.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:59 am

Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:03 pm

In post 352, FA_Q2 wrote:
In post 348, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 344, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 341, LicketyQuickety wrote:I've done this before but to no avail, but I think it might be interesting to see where this goes:

VOTE: Salamence

Didnt know you scumread me.

I consider this an OMGUS

I'm not scumreading you.

You are voting someone that you do not think is scum?

That makes absolutely zero sense.

It makes sense to me.

In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

What if I'm more valuable as the game progresses?

Salamence20 · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:08 pm

VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:09 pm

In post 355, Salamence20 wrote:VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ
VOTE: LQ

You only get one vote per person.

Salamence20 · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:11 pm

Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:14 pm

In post 357, Salamence20 wrote:Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

To see where it goes...

Salamence20 · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:16 pm

In post 358, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 357, Salamence20 wrote:Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

To see where it goes...

What regular people see.

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 357, Salamence20 wrote:Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

Im scum testing the waters on your lynch.

What I see

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:18 pm

In post 359, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 358, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 357, Salamence20 wrote:Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

To see where it goes...

What regular people see.

LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 357, Salamence20 wrote:Why are you voting me if youre not scumreading me?

Im scum testing the waters on your lynch.

What I see

I'm not normal

Slandaar · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:21 pm

In post 350, Salamence20 wrote:Do you think Anna/Drakc are bussing their buddy or wagoning town based on their lazy votes?

You know what I think is most likely.

Sala: You hear of bus?
Sala: Scum bandwagoning town.

Both situations the Person making the action is scum and in only one is the recipient scum.

So, why do you question me on moving vote?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:27 pm

In post 354, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 352, FA_Q2 wrote:
In post 348, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 344, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 341, LicketyQuickety wrote:I've done this before but to no avail, but I think it might be interesting to see where this goes:

VOTE: Salamence

Didnt know you scumread me.

I consider this an OMGUS

I'm not scumreading you.

You are voting someone that you do not think is scum?

That makes absolutely zero sense.

It makes sense to me.

In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

What if I'm more valuable as the game progresses?

You won't make it till late game, and RC is the only late game carry this team needs.

Salamence20 · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:32 pm

RC can you carry your ego?

It seems huge

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:39 pm

In post 362, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 354, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 352, FA_Q2 wrote:
In post 348, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 344, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 341, LicketyQuickety wrote:I've done this before but to no avail, but I think it might be interesting to see where this goes:

VOTE: Salamence

Didnt know you scumread me.

I consider this an OMGUS

I'm not scumreading you.

You are voting someone that you do not think is scum?

That makes absolutely zero sense.

It makes sense to me.

In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

What if I'm more valuable as the game progresses?

You won't make it till late game, and RC is the only late game carry this team needs.

I didn't say I would make it to late game, I said "what if I become more valuable as the game progresses".

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:12 pm

I've only got one thing bigger than my ego.

my brain.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:13 pm

In post 365, RadiantCowbells wrote:I've only got one thing bigger than my ego.

my brain.

I see you are not wise beyond your years.

BBmolla · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:19 pm

Hostility isn't scummy.

BBmolla · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:20 pm

In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

This is shit logic.

I could say the same about you dude.

Is anyone going to explain the lq scum reads I still don't see ut

GlidingPigeon · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:23 pm

Everything has become so confusing!

In post 328, havingfitz wrote:
In post 280, havingfitz wrote:
Despite the page count it’s still early in the game…but I’m comfortable with my vote on Lickety. Why? For those of you not intuitive enough to fensive reaction to the handful of questions/concerns I directed his way.

2 – Posts that make no sense/add nothing to the game….the unnecessary vote/unvote post.

3 – His repeated use of ad hom, misreps, and other logical fallacies in response to me to discredit my play (i.e. weaken suspicions directed at him) while failing to simply provide answers to the questions asked.

4 – His declaration that he (paraphrasing) is a misunderstood thinker who doesn’t like to explain himself. How convenient if one is scum.

5 – The vote on Yuki because she is easy to get a read on while claiming to not have reads on anyone. Perhaps because of Yuiki’s experience level which he (LQ) hypocritically is using as a negative towards me.

In post 231, LicketyQuickety wrote:I told my reason for this and I seriously don't like how dull you are coming across. The reason is because I looked at their wiki and made a gut call that they would be easy to get a read out of and voted for pressure.

In post 281, YurikoJasmine wrote:I do not have a wiki atm unless somebody made one for me and didn't tell me

In post 289, LicketyQuickety wrote:I was not aware that I lied,

@LQ did you lie to us? Its sounds like you did and you got caught...

@FA Just wondering, why are you still voting Molla?

@Anna why do you think that FA is more scum than LQ?

@Sala I am only keeping my vote off of Molla today. I will admit that that behavior is suspicious, but he has calmed down.
Why don't you like FA's wagon?

@RC why isn't LQ's alignment relevant?

I am suspecting FA, but don't like the lie that LQ slipped up on:

VOTE Lickety Quickety

havingfitz · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:46 pm

In post 368, BBmolla wrote:Is anyone going to explain the lq scum reads I still don't see ut

WTF do you think this is?

And since you are a fan of people explaining their reads...how about you explain your read on me?

In post 254, BBmolla wrote:fitz/FAQ/Sala

Salamence20 · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:51 pm

In post 367, BBmolla wrote:Hostility isn't scummy.

Disagree.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:59 pm

In post 368, BBmolla wrote:This is shit logic.

I could say the same about you dude.

Is anyone going to explain the lq scum reads I still don't see ut

Except for the fact that it's not true at all because I'm not guaranteed to get lynched when I'm town.

BBmolla · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:15 pm

In post 371, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 367, BBmolla wrote:Hostility isn't scummy.

Disagree.

Kuribo

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:27 pm

In post 369, GlidingPigeon wrote:Everything has become so confusing!

In post 328, havingfitz wrote:
In post 280, havingfitz wrote:
Despite the page count it’s still early in the game…but I’m comfortable with my vote on Lickety. Why? For those of you not intuitive enough to fensive reaction to the handful of questions/concerns I directed his way.

2 – Posts that make no sense/add nothing to the game….the unnecessary vote/unvote post.

3 – His repeated use of ad hom, misreps, and other logical fallacies in response to me to discredit my play (i.e. weaken suspicions directed at him) while failing to simply provide answers to the questions asked.

4 – His declaration that he (paraphrasing) is a misunderstood thinker who doesn’t like to explain himself. How convenient if one is scum.

5 – The vote on Yuki because she is easy to get a read on while claiming to not have reads on anyone. Perhaps because of Yuiki’s experience level which he (LQ) hypocritically is using as a negative towards me.

In post 231, LicketyQuickety wrote:I told my reason for this and I seriously don't like how dull you are coming across. The reason is because I looked at their wiki and made a gut call that they would be easy to get a read out of and voted for pressure.

In post 281, YurikoJasmine wrote:I do not have a wiki atm unless somebody made one for me and didn't tell me

In post 289, LicketyQuickety wrote:I was not aware that I lied,

@LQ did you lie to us? Its sounds like you did and you got caught...

@FA Just wondering, why are you still voting Molla?

@Anna why do you think that FA is more scum than LQ?

@Sala I am only keeping my vote off of Molla today. I will admit that that behavior is suspicious, but he has calmed down.
Why don't you like FA's wagon?

@RC why isn't LQ's alignment relevant?

I am suspecting FA, but don't like the lie that LQ slipped up on:

VOTE Lickety Quickety

Why would I lie about something that is so easily verifiable? What is more likely: that I made a mistake and did not believe I was telling a lie at that time, or that I lied on something that could have been checked at any time by anyone to verify it to be true or not? Better yet, what would I gain out of lying in that case? Feel free to really think that one through.