Mini 1682 - Game Over

BBmolla · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:56 pm

In post 410, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

Agreed

You should lynch FAQ

BBmolla · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:56 pm

In post 420, GlidingPigeon wrote:
In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

What do you mean by this? That what they are saying is just fluff?

I'm saying they're making things up.
AKA, scum.

People act differently when they believe a read for reasons and when they're just making it up.

Salamence20 · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:08 pm

In post 425, BBmolla wrote:
In post 410, Salamence20 wrote:
In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

Agreed

You should lynch FAQ

I would and I could!

But...

Anna and Drakced's votes pester me

FA_Q2 · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:22 pm

In post 409, Salamence20 wrote:VOTE: Whisper

Care to expound on that?

Why is everyone throwing around naked votes this game?

FA_Q2 · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:23 pm

In post 426, BBmolla wrote:
In post 420, GlidingPigeon wrote:
In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

What do you mean by this? That what they are saying is just fluff?

I'm saying they're making things up.
AKA, scum.

People act differently when they believe a read for reasons and when they're just making it up.

I have given reasons for my reads.

Most of your posts can be summed up with "we should lynch FA_Q2."

Notice the lack of real reasons.

FA_Q2 · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:25 pm

In post 405, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 402, BBmolla wrote:What was it you actually looked at that you thought was yukis wiki

I'm not sure. I'm the type of person who doesn't keep track of where/what I am getting the info from as much as I should. I tend to make correct (and incorrect) conclusions from who knows what and my reasons are not usually as accurate as my conclusion itself.

P-Edit: does this ^ explanation do the trick?

P-Edit: at this point my flip is likely to give pretty much no info to Town.

That is a rather poor excuse.

You seemed to remember specifics when no one knew that it was false. Now you don't remember anything...

YurikoJasmine · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:39 pm

Ok, I'm forming some reads, but I have absolutely no time to put it in words. I promise I'll build something over the weekend and keep following stuff.

mod: V/LA till Saturday

BBmolla · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:41 pm

In post 429, FA_Q2 wrote:
In post 426, BBmolla wrote:
In post 420, GlidingPigeon wrote:
In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

What do you mean by this? That what they are saying is just fluff?

I'm saying they're making things up.
AKA, scum.

People act differently when they believe a read for reasons and when they're just making it up.

I have given reasons for my reads.

Most of your posts can be summed up with "we should lynch FA_Q2."

Notice the lack of real reasons.

In post 408, BBmolla wrote:I don't think faq believes anything they post

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:36 pm

hey azusa what do you think of the op

1baldeagle1 · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:54 pm

In post 353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, LQ's alignment is not relevant.

The player WILL be lynched at some point.

Might as well do it today.

Dumb idea.

In post 413, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm really not liking Whisper at all.

To answer your question, I don't like voting weak players when I could be getting the stronger ones, so even if LQ slot is like 5% more likely to flip scum I'd rather lynch BBMolla because LQ!scum is far more likely to get lynched even if I don't do it myself.

Unless I missed it, why aren't you liking Whisper?

Also, people that are on wagons with only 1 vote, plz move it somewhere else so it's actually useful.

Slandaar · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Thu Jun 11, 2015 11:19 pm

@GG: did you find this answer sufficient?

In post 392, Annadog40 wrote:
In post 369, GlidingPigeon wrote:

@Anna why do you think that FA is more scum than LQ?

Because of their posts

(@Anna)

Why do you think FA is scum?
Why are you posting so little?

Annadog40 · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:33 am

In post 435, Slandaar wrote:@GG: did you find this answer sufficient?

In post 392, Annadog40 wrote:
In post 369, GlidingPigeon wrote:

@Anna why do you think that FA is more scum than LQ?

Because of their posts

(@Anna)

Why do you think FA is scum?
Why are you posting so little?

1.

Because of their posts

Because for the reasons others have stated like here

2. Cause There are so many people posting already I feel there is little point in posting a bunch when their are already people doing that.

ChaosOmega · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:46 am

Votecount 1.09

FA_Q2 (4) - 1baldeagle1, BBmolla, Drakced, Annadog40
LicketyQuickety (2) - havingfitz, Gypsy Girl
RadiantCowbells (1) - whispersilk
YurikoJasmine (1) - RadiantCowbells
1baldeagle1 (1) - YurikoJasmine
Drakced (1) - Slandaar
BBmolla (1) - FA_Q2
whispersilk (1) - Salamence20
Salamence20 (1) - LicketyQuickety

Not Voting (0) -

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2015-06-21 17:02:45).

Slandaar · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:09 am

In post 436, Annadog40 wrote:2. Cause There are so many people posting already I feel there is little point in posting a bunch when their are already people doing that.

By contributing to the discussion and actively scumhunting you could find/help find scum.

You

do

want to find scum?

Annadog40 · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:14 am

In post 438, Slandaar wrote:
By contributing to the discussion and actively scumhunting you could find/help find scum.

You
do
want to find scum?

Yes

Slandaar · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:23 am

Your actions suggest otherwise. I believe the saying is actions speak louder than words.

You are a lurkaderp scum but had no such problems as town. Whisper is going to explain why she thinks differently but until then I suggest you start posting.

Annadog40 · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:02 am

In post 440, Slandaar wrote:

You are a lurkaderp scum but had no such problems as town.

Or I can be a lurkaderp in some games and a more talkative in other games independent of being scum or town.

Right now I feel that FA_Q2 is the most scum like and feel that others are doing better arguments than I could and other people are posting more so I feel I'd get in the way.

GlidingPigeon · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 6:10 am

@slandar (Quote got messed up)
"@GG: did you find this answer sufficient?"

I would love it if you could go into more detail, but if you don't want to thats ok. Do you agree with moll about FA "not believing what he posts/says"?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:26 pm

I have no commeent.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:29 pm

In post 441, Annadog40 wrote:
In post 440, Slandaar wrote:

You are a lurkaderp scum but had no such problems as town.

Or I can be a lurkaderp in some games and a more talkative in other games independent of being scum or town.

Right now I feel that FA_Q2 is the most scum like and feel that others are doing better arguments than I could and other people are posting more so I feel I'd get in the way.

I don't like this response one bit.

VOTE: Anna

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:41 pm

VOTE: LicketyQuickety

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:45 pm

In case it merits explanation, I'm voting LQ because I was voting YJ more because she bugged me than for any alignment reasons, and while I'm on V/LA I want to be voting the highest probability scum.

havingfitz · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:07 pm

Though probably not v/LA worthy, it's worth noting I will be doing an overnight hike this weekend and I expect I'll have little or no internet access until Monday.

I.e. I'll be very scarce.

1baldeagle1 · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:35 pm

Yeah, Annadog is looking more scummier as time progresses.

Slandaar · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:40 pm

In post 441, Annadog40 wrote:Or I can be a lurkaderp in some games and a more talkative in other games independent of being scum or town.

Perhaps. I think those who lurk as scum don't do so as a strategy this removes a large part of your range ie active town and assuming I am correct this leaves your range very scum heavy. I am asking you to prove me wrong. (On mobile if someone doesn't understand will explain better later)