MINI 1688 — BEES!!! — game over

[Marquis]

(expired on 2015-06-19 17:45:00)

(Fri Jun 19 @ 5:45:00 PM EST)

VOTECOUNT 1.06

• (3)

  Bellaphant

  —
  Glork, TellTaleHeart, Untrod Tripod
  
  (0)

  Bicephalous Bob

  —
  
  
  (0)

  Bob Loblaw

  —
  
  
  (1)

  Fro99er

  —
  Bob Loblaw
  
  (0)

  Glork

  —
  
  
  (0)

  Green Crayons

  —
  
  
  (2)

  KayP

  —
  Green Crayons, Bellaphant
  
  (0)

  Kitty Galore

  —
  
  
  (2)

  lalaladucks

  —
  Kitty Galore, Shadoxx8
  
  (2)

  Shadoxx8

  —
  KayP, lalaladucks
  
  (0)

  TellTaleHeart

  —
  
  
  (0)

  The Bulge

  —
  
  
  (3)

  Untrod Tripod

  —
  The Bulge, Bicephalous Bob, Fro99er
  
  
  (0)

  (NOT VOTING)

  —
  
  
  With
  13

  alive
  , it takes
  7

  votes
  to lynch.
  
  

  ---

  Fro99er
  is V/LA until
  Thurs Jun 18 @ 10 PM EST
  .

[KayP]

VOTE: Bellaphant

Ooooooh. Please elaborate.

[The Bulge]

VOTE: Bellaphant

Ooooooh. Please elaborate.

Why are you asking this?

[The Bulge]

(ie; why do you care, what's it to you, etc)

[KayP]

Because I had a gut ping/twinge re: Bella earlier.

[TellTaleHeart]

VOTE: Bellaphant

Ooooooh. Please elaborate.

Spoiler:

[TellTaleHeart]

Long story short: The train of thought in Bella's game here is really choppy and I think it's scum awkwardness as she adjusts to town flow in the early game.

Case in point: the progression on my L-2 vote. Somehow, Frogger's comments are bad (Post 89) but then we figure out

all

the way on page 4 that she thought my L-2 vote "without comment" was somehow offensive (Post 92). "L-X without comment" is a really easy thing to lean on but it doesn't require much thought and those arguments tend to turn out to be really superficial. What's worse is that she fishes for [backup] before actually voting (Post 92).

The KayP vote, which is kind of blah in and of itself, after Gammagooey's twin brother here gave her a kick in the pants is also weird.

[Bicephalous Bob]

Somehow, Frogger's comments are bad (Post 89)

Why are you saying "somehow" when her reason for thinking the comments were bad are clearly stated in the post you linked?

[TellTaleHeart]

Because "Frogger's comments are bad" doesn't jive with "oh yeah, TTH's vote was suspicious let's vote her."

[Green Crayons]

I'm curious about your "

all

the way" characterization. Her Post 89 and Post 92 are on the same page. That's... not very far, certainly not "all the way" far.

[TellTaleHeart]

My L-2 vote was on page 1.

Please keep up, people.

[TellTaleHeart]

Is this going to be "let's take little potshots at TTH because Bella is my houseplant"? I'm telling you right now, I'm going to fucking hate your guts if you play that game.

There's really nothing that says the scum read on Kay is legit and I

really

don't like Bella's reaction to Glork because the context very much suggests "kneejerk reaction." If you want to argue those point in ~words~ please do so. If you think the Kay push is super-de-dooper and beautiful, fine. The sharpshooting at "ergh, something about the time frame" or "Let me be obtuse and everything is so clearly explained" is irritating.

[Green Crayons]

TTH

Ladyfriend

Please

I'll let you know when I'm attacking you. I'll become a super smug asshole. Until then, less hackles.

[Green Crayons]

I actually found your "case in point" paragraph difficult to follow, and I originally had a line up of several questions

But I reread it a few times, and I think I get what you're saying

the "all the way" characterization just still stood out at me

[TellTaleHeart]

I haven't had my wine yet tonight so for now you get hackles.

[Green Crayons]

I really don't like Bella's reaction to Glork because the context very much suggests "kneejerk reaction."

I mean, yes, this is pretty much the best reason to vote Bella.

(Your specific problems with frogger/TTH I will wait to see what Bella has to say for herself regarding them.)

What do you think about the fact that she had just recently used that very suspicion to push Kay suspicions?

Am I being paranoid, or is frog/kayP/GC interaction pinging for anyone else?

Be more specific.

You said you saw something you haven't explained (it might be his meta push?) then mentioned re-voting, and Kay immediately follows you on to Frog. I didn't like her vote jump in response to your prod. What did you think about it?

[TellTaleHeart]

Talk is cheap and when the chips hit the table, there's only one thing that matters: the vote.

[Green Crayons]

TTH I don't even understand how that answers my question/observation at all.

[Green Crayons]

I think the vote-Kay-immediately-after-being-prodded suspicion is valid on its own.

I give pause, however, when Bella had really recently pointed out Kay's very own actions that fit that mold as being suspicion potential.

Scum are usually very self conscious about their play. Taking this piece of suspicion requires believing that Bella simultaneously (A) recognized this play as scummy and (B) failed to recognize that she was committing the very same act she called suspicious.

[TellTaleHeart]

TTH I don't even understand how that answers my question/observation at all.

OK, here's a more direct and bitchy answer:

So what?

[TellTaleHeart]

You know, the more wine I drink, the more I really want to take a defibrillator to the ducks wagon.

[Green Crayons]

So what?

I am a psychic and a genius, and therefore foresaw this question and answered it in 168

[Green Crayons]

You know, the more wine I drink, the more I really want to take a defibrillator to the ducks wagon.

I'll raise my glass of Glenfiddich to this, and in the spirit of working together:

UNVOTE: Kay
VOTE: shadox

[Green Crayons]

Kitty is equally bad, but shadox has votes and BWs rock.

[TellTaleHeart]

Her alternative was to tell Glork to lick her ass and that she wasn't going to vote Kay.