ya you thought it was towny which is why you unvoted. also literally nothing changed between then and now except you being accused of disingenuous backpedalingIn post 594, Quilford wrote:In post 590, Soft-spoken wrote:@quil... oh btw the response you just said you didnt like... it was right before you said my posts were starting to look genuine so... bullshit.
Yeah the posts were starting to look genuine in that they had more personality. I mistook that for towniness at the time.
Micro 488: Forest Fire - Endgame
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
Why would scum even bother to make a post that contains shit all if they didn't think they would get points for at least looking like they were doing something? Especially valid in your case considering it was already a couple pages in and it was your first post of the game that wouldn't be longer than two sentences or something.-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 600, Soft-spoken wrote:ya you thought it was towny which is why you unvoted. also literally nothing changed between then and now except you being accused of disingenuous backpedaling
1. I haven't unvoted
2. I read your posts again-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
In post 602, Quilford wrote:In post 600, Soft-spoken wrote:ya you thought it was towny which is why you unvoted. also literally nothing changed between then and now except you being accused of disingenuous backpedaling
1. I haven't unvoted
2. I read your posts again
obviously. thats my point. why wouldnt you unvote if you actually thought i was scum initially then suddenly realised i was being towny? thats the whole fucking reason why i thought it was scummy and i said that already. it would look a lot more believable if you unvoted at that point, then after rereading deciding that you were wrong... put your vote back up. instead you left your vote up and backpedaled on your logic saying the very posts you thought indicated me being genuine are now scummy .... after being acused that your townread was disingenuous-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
and yet you say i was trying hard... you have no logical thought process that i can identify.In post 603, Quilford wrote:We were fifteen pages in, this was going to be your first post of the game that wasn't confirming or complaining about the fact that we were fifteen pages in, I think you would have felt under pressure to try and scrape something longer than two sentences together.-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
In post 605, Quilford wrote:*Quil's inner monologue*
Wow. Apparently if I had unvoted at the time, I would be looking a lot more town now! Damn, will have to remember not to make that mistake again in future scum games
not putting your money where your mouth is is one of the most reliable tells i have ever encountered-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 606, Soft-spoken wrote:
and yet you say i was trying hard... you have no logical thought process that i can identify.In post 603, Quilford wrote:We were fifteen pages in, this was going to be your first post of the game that wasn't confirming or complaining about the fact that we were fifteen pages in, I think you would have felt under pressure to try and scrape something longer than two sentences together.
Yes. After being absent for fifteen pages, you obviously were going to TRY HARDER to put a post together so that it least gave the appearance of having content.-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 608, Soft-spoken wrote:In post 605, Quilford wrote:*Quil's inner monologue*
Wow. Apparently if I had unvoted at the time, I would be looking a lot more town now! Damn, will have to remember not to make that mistake again in future scum games
not putting your money where your mouth is is one of the most reliable tells i have ever encountered
Sure bud-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
In post 609, Quilford wrote:In post 606, Soft-spoken wrote:
and yet you say i was trying hard... you have no logical thought process that i can identify.In post 603, Quilford wrote:We were fifteen pages in, this was going to be your first post of the game that wasn't confirming or complaining about the fact that we were fifteen pages in, I think you would have felt under pressure to try and scrape something longer than two sentences together.
Yes. After being absent for fifteen pages, you obviously were going to TRY HARDER to put a post together so that it least gave the appearance of having content.
yes, i would have tried harder to put a towny looking post together. you are talking in circles.-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 491, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Soft, I want you to explain the "Most legitimate scum-tells are invalid in this setup" stance from Post 367, run me through what scum-tells exactly are invalidated due to the setup and why that's the case.
Speaking of tells, did you ever do this?-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 611, Soft-spoken wrote:yes, i would have tried harder to put a towny looking post together.
Great, we agree. Glad that's resolved.-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
obviously not because you are still voting me.In post 613, Quilford wrote:In post 611, Soft-spoken wrote:yes, i would have tried harder to put a towny looking post together.
Great, we agree. Glad that's resolved.-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 615, Soft-spoken wrote:
obviously not because you are still voting me.In post 613, Quilford wrote:In post 611, Soft-spoken wrote:yes, i would have tried harder to put a towny looking post together.
Great, we agree. Glad that's resolved.
Well, you've been agreeing with the things I've been saying. Not the other way around.-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
ok, summarize in a paragraph what was scummy about my opener so i can tell you how full of shit you are in one line... you are taking fragments of logic and running in circles.
Pedit: if you dont know... you are too dense to have a conversation with
Pedit2 : i havnt agreed with a single thing you have said-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 611, Soft-spoken wrote:In post 609, Quilford wrote:you obviously were going to TRY HARDER to put a post together so that it least gave the appearance of having content.
yes, i would have tried harder to put a towny looking post together.
Looks like agreement to me lol-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
In post 618, Soft-spoken wrote:Pedit: if you dont know... you are too dense to have a conversation with
I knew you would dodge. I specifically asked for you to describe it in your own words.-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
Soft-spoken Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: March 6, 2015
-
-
sangres Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4466
- Joined: July 8, 2013
- Location: Siege Perilous
In post 571, Gold Saucer wrote:1) nacho never really adequately explained the special pleading he invoked as to why he pushed muffin for the conflicting read and not someone else
1) Rempire not identifying Pie's post was town wasn't overly surprising to me. Sometimes Regfan makes strange pushes and it doesn't surprise me that Empire gets a little caught up in them, and I wouldn't expect many players to get a town read on someone after they overreacted as much as pie did to the push on her.
I don't expect you to have the same reaction to pies push that I did. I don't play with you enough or have a strong enough understanding of you as a player to hold expectations of how you should react to things like that.
I expect Tammy to read pie's reactions as town eventually, but I also know she sometimes takes a while to form reads and that she's been doing other things.
Molla did have that reaction.
Quilford I know nothing about.
I know even less about soft-spoken and yuriko.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.