NY 184: a help (done)

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1875 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:56 am

You're the one being logically consistent there.

You said that the last scum was playing a solid game. I pointed out you are in the solid game category.

You got mad at me for misusing your logic, but that's precisely what led me to force you to agree in

Pretty sure a lot of people are townreading me

Try harder.

I'm sorry, but wasn't I on this slot when it was a HARD lynch too? I didn't just start scumreading the slot post-boonskies replace in

You just see whatever you want to see. You're tunneling is bird brained

That only changes the part where it defend you alignment wise.

It still makes you nonsense for arguing that scum played a solid game then voting the person who is weakest at that point in time.

You act like this is a trend of mine, so I'd love to see some more examples

That's not just a trend of yours, that's a trend in this whole game.

MattP · Post Post #1876 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:11 am

1) Again, I am clearly in the middle of the spectrum between being a universal townread (A) and a universal scumread (B). You stated I was heavily towards the B side of the spectrum. Then when I pointed out I was not, you concluded that I was therefore heavily towards the A side of the spectrum, completely disregarding I could be in the middle of the spectrum (which I am). And the

best

part is that you clearly initially were saying I was on the B side to take away any potential bragging rights you feared I would have if I

was

scum and

did

win the game, and then you tried to immediately thereafter go 180 degrees and say the opposite was true, that I was on the A side, to justify me being scum

based on my OWN interpretation of EPM's actions in the game

. You tried using my logic to justify your narrative AND accused me of two different things within 2 subsequent posts that were complete opposites of each other

2) Sure, I did contradict my own logic by voting Boonskies at that time. You didn't clarify that was your point at the time I called you out though, you just dropped the subject altogether

3) First off, I have NOT once townread someone after they started townreading me. Second, if it is a trend this whole game then what does that have to do with me?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1877 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:15 am

1) Again, I am clearly in the middle of the spectrum between being a universal townread (A) and a universal scumread (B). You stated I was heavily towards the B side of the spectrum. Then when I pointed out I was not, you concluded that I was therefore heavily towards the A side of the spectrum, completely disregarding I could be in the middle of the spectrum (which I am). And the best part is that you clearly initially were saying I was on the B side to take away any potential bragging rights you feared I would have if I was scum and did win the game, and then you tried to immediately thereafter go 180 degrees and say the opposite was true, that I was on the A side, to justify me being scum based on my OWN interpretation of EPM's actions in the game. You tried using my logic to justify your narrative AND accused me of two different things within 2 subsequent posts that were complete opposites of each other

I baited you into a trap and you fell for it.

2) Sure, I did contradict my own logic by voting Boonskies at that time. You didn't clarify that was your point at the time I called you out though, you just dropped the subject altogether

I won't drop the subject till you're dead.

3) First off, I have NOT once townread someone after they started townreading me. Second, if it is a trend this whole game then what does that have to do with me?

It doesn't?

MattP · Post Post #1878 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:18 am

In post 1877, RadiantCowbells wrote:I baited you into a trap and you fell for it.

Gonna step back from this convo because a) you didn't do anything b) you are again completely ignoring the logic regarding not being on either of the two extremes c) you're just obnoxious to talk to because you're so full of yourself

Titus · Post Post #1879 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:09 pm

Mental vla

My good friend just got sent to the hospital. I play mafia as a distraction but if I seem distracted please deal with it.

X-post all games.

vonflare · Post Post #1880 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:16 pm

MattP is town.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1881 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:32 pm

You all can keep saying that but you all are wrong.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1882 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:35 pm

mattp's town. he's my mason buddy. (bro...check him or flubber.)

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1883 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:41 pm

If you're claiming mason claim it for reals because that means we're looking at 4 scum guaranteed and scum will probably already know if you're telling the truth.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1884 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:48 pm

Tomorrow though.

Titus · Post Post #1885 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:57 pm

In post 1883, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you're claiming mason claim it for reals because that means we're looking at 4 scum guaranteed and scum will probably already know if you're telling the truth.

The mason claim is not likely serious.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1886 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:14 pm

In post 1885, Titus wrote:
In post 1883, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you're claiming mason claim it for reals because that means we're looking at 4 scum guaranteed and scum will probably already know if you're telling the truth.

The mason claim is not likely serious.

This is why I'm not believing Titus isn't scum until he flip. If there's a 4th scum, this is communicating to the final scum partner. There is no town motive to saying that right now, as if scum for some reason believed it, I could easily have soaked up a NK, which would be awesome right now.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1887 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:23 pm

If there's a 4th scum, it's Matt.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1888 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:23 pm

I'll be glad if this is scum but I'm not feeling it.

Titus · Post Post #1889 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:29 pm

In post 1886, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 1885, Titus wrote:
In post 1883, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you're claiming mason claim it for reals because that means we're looking at 4 scum guaranteed and scum will probably already know if you're telling the truth.

The mason claim is not likely serious.

This is why I'm not believing Titus isn't scum until he flip. If there's a 4th scum, this is communicating to the final scum partner. There is no town motive to saying that right now, as if scum for some reason believed it, I could easily have soaked up a NK, which would be awesome right now.

Playing till the flip I see.

There's absolute town motivation in highlighting what is an obvious joke.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1890 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:36 pm

Bro, I'm not going to tell you who to check.

However, if you don't check MattP then we're lynching him tomorrow.

If that bothers you, check him.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1891 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:37 pm

False. ^ if he gets a guilty on flubber, we're lynching flubber. If he gets an inno on flubber, we're lynching matt.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1892 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:38 pm

OK if guilty then we lynch them instead.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1893 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:38 pm

@Titus - how does it help town win? Hmm? And if RC didn't think it was obvious, then it

obviously

wasn't obvious.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1894 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:39 pm

And if Bro dies...which really, he should, unless scum want to go for a mislynch on him (or the off chance he is scum, which will fuck him over in 2 days anyways).

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1895 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:42 pm

Scum!Bro in 3 scum will solve itself.

Scum!Bro in 4 scum could still prove an issue but we'll PoE him if we get his partner.

But 4 scum would mean we have more PRs left.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #1896 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:44 pm

Wait I thought Matt claimed gs too?

Boonskiies · Post Post #1897 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:47 pm

No. Bro and I are the claimed gunsmiths. (mine is backup, though)

Micc · Post Post #1898 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:50 pm

Flip within the next hour. Hopefully not quite that long.

Micc · Post Post #1899 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:06 pm

page bump