NY 184: a help (done)

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1950 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:39 pm

Boon, if you mistrust me that's fine.

I will selfvote if I have 4 people agree to lynch Matt tomorrow.

MattP · Post Post #1951 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:40 pm

In post 1949, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're trying to save my ML for LyLo because you're going to get lynched after I go down either way.

You think this game revolves around you

I care SO little about you and the complete lack of anything useful or enjoyable you've contributed to this game

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1952 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:41 pm

I care so little for how you criticize my playstyle for trying to lynch you.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1953 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:42 pm

VOTE: Flubber

Scum's not out of the people I've been interacting with.

MattP · Post Post #1954 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:42 pm

In post 1952, RadiantCowbells wrote:I care so little for how you criticize my playstyle for trying to lynch you.

Other people have tried to lynch me without fake investigations and threatening to self vote

Never talking with you again after this post

Boonskiies · Post Post #1955 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:43 pm

If Flubber isn't scum, I'd jump on board with a Matt lynch if I am alive.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1956 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:43 pm

Broseidon was displeased about that in 167 too.

Scum never like being caught.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1957 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:43 pm

But I'm pretty positive the game ends with Flubber.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1958 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:45 pm

In post 970, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 864, BROseidon wrote:
In post 861, Flubbernugget wrote:Bulge/OS/RC(??)/Grimm/Piss(??) scumteam

Too many scum, try again

Why are you implying I should have 100% confidence in my reads right now

Boon, unvote until I can talk to our resident conftowns.

MattP · Post Post #1959 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:46 pm

In post 1956, RadiantCowbells wrote:Broseidon was displeased about that in 167 too.

Scum never like being caught.

So funny & interesting you think that because I've been very vocal about my seething dislike of playing with you before you ever voted me or even had me as a scum read

Ok no never talking again

Boonskiies · Post Post #1960 (ISO) » Sat Jun 20, 2015 6:48 pm

Me unvoting shows lack of confidence. I'm confident.

Ankamius · Post Post #1961 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:09 am

In post 1915, MattP wrote:
In post 1349, Ankamius wrote:I don't really care about the actual reads.

Kinetic was the one firmly pushing it over everyone else, and half the player list almost just kind of chimed in agreeing passively. Now that Kinetic is dead and no one else is speaking up about it (RC mentioned it in passing but didn't push it at all), suddenly no one is interested in it anymore.

The even funnier part is that the list of people forming this list are the same people that aren't really doing anything and haven't since basically the point that I replaced in.

There's definitely scum intent in there and the fact that it takes me ripping off all my limbs and making a lovely mosaic with all my internal organs to get pretty much anything out of 90% of the player list is doing fuck all to narrow down the possibilities. It helps that except for pisskop, everyone I've been able to get stuff out of had town responses.

In post 1917, MattP wrote:^Laughably town post from Ankamius which makes me feel pretty confident he's town REGARDLESS of the pisskop crumb.

I suddenly like Mattp for scum a lot more now.

Ankamius · Post Post #1962 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:25 am

Actually, RC, can you go into why you suddenly switched to that stance as well?

MattP · Post Post #1963 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:30 am

I had you as a townread via a probably cop investigation before that, it's not like I was just using it to do a "180" you

Ankamius · Post Post #1964 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:50 am

No, but your reasoning did.

MattP · Post Post #1965 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:56 am

My reasoning is unchanged

On top of my reasoning, I was just pointing out something that I ALSO liked?

I mean usually at this stage of the game I rego over the thread just to make sure I'm positive about how I feel

Elyse · Post Post #1966 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:08 am

VOTE: MattP

Ankamius · Post Post #1967 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:33 am

No, but I've seen a very similar strategy used by scum early this year (or late last year? Somewhere around there). The only reason I'm hesitant at all is because you showed your work and the last scum didn't.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1968 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:45 am

There's not enough claimed PRs for there to be 4 scum.

You're townier than Jake but I wouldn't townread your slot in a vacuum.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1969 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:49 am

I mean my issue is that there's all the terrible associative tells between you and EPM from when Jake had the slot.

Boonskiies · Post Post #1970 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:52 am

In post 1909, MattP wrote:I would say Ank is less "hmmm" than RC based on the pk crumb

This does

NOT

come from scum this point in the game. Simple as that. It's Flubber or RC.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1971 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:55 am

I'm trying to think if we can force Boonskiies to make a target that will force him to PoE himself out if he's scum.

vonflare · Post Post #1972 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:58 am

Exams

Post later.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1973 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 10:01 am

Okay so we have 2 clears.

Boonskiies dying clears the slot.

Boonskiies living lets scum kill a clear and leaves us with 2 clears + Boon + 1 unchecked + me

We lynch the unchecked or me and it goes into 3 way with Boon, a clear, and the remaining person.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1974 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2015 10:14 am

Boon!Scum seems relatively benign given that we can force him to check Flubber and then he has to go into lylo versing me or Ankamius, if he even gets there. Might catch him out on his claims, too.

Matt's still the best lynch.