Titus wrote:BBT, you can yell at me for being wrong if you still believe Thor is scum only. Otherwise you wagoned a cop. The associative are there.
Plot says gee, I could "compromise" on Shinobi but then tries to play the wagon as impossible. Classic distancing. All three of Plot Shinobi ad Frogger stonewalled when I suggested them as scum. If Plot votes here, Shinobi is viable, and that is not good for them.
In post 1345, Titus wrote:BBT, you can yell at me for being wrong if you still believe Thor is scum only. Otherwise you wagoned a cop. The associative are there.
Plot says gee, I could "compromise" on Shinobi but then tries to play the wagon as impossible. Classic distancing. All three of Plot Shinobi ad Frogger stonewalled when I suggested them as scum. If Plot votes here, Shinobi is viable, and that is not good for them.
In post 1347, Plotinus wrote:In post 1340, Fro99er wrote:In post 1338, Plotinus wrote:people i’m not lynching:
townleans: bbt, frogger, thor, tool, self
nulltowns: tere, bella, zor
pedit: you guys type too much
VOTE: Titus
Why aren't tex or shin on that list?
tex was almost on the list! I backspaced her because she’s really really null for me and I asked myself “but would you vote her if it was 5 minutes to the deadline and you had to prevent no lynch” and the answer was yes.
shin is also very nearly on the list but not quite. i’ve liked his initeractions with me so far; they’ve made sense to me. he would be a compromise lynch for me.
In post 1328, Fro99er wrote:Lapsa...let's flashwagon Titus.
In post 1337, Fro99er wrote:Keep voting Titus people
In post 1193, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 1179, Lapsa wrote:
I don't find flashwagon carousel cool. with shallow analysis bussing becomes too easy and meaning gets entirely disintegrated
So much this. A flash-wagon now is perfect for scum to throw their votes on any wagon they like and kill any chance of VCA.
I have been pushing for people to consolidate their votes since we had 4 days 18 hours left and nobody gave a shit.
In post 1341, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Thor you appear to be confusing play-style with meta.
They are two separate things.
VOTE: Titus
In post 1336, Bellaphant wrote:@ Thor, I did, but Titus's push on you was really 'only plausible vote for a lynch', 'short cases on...' and 'Thor should claim'. She even restates that she's not really pushing in 1266. So your reaction seemed odd, hence the question. I'm happy to lynch Zor, but most people seem to be townreading him.
In post 1341, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Thor you appear to be confusing play-style with meta.
They are two separate things.
In post 1351, Fro99er wrote:I'm pretty sure that's a fakeclaim
In post 1352, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:THIS FUCKING GAME.
In post 1330, Titus wrote:@Lapsa, Yup. I never read on replacing in.
In post 1358, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I believe Plot 100% over Titus.
In post 1355, Thor665 wrote:
How do you define meta if not playstyle?
Also, so now Titus is a valid lynch - what about Zor?
And what does your naked vote like about the Titus wagon?
Unvote: Titus
Vote: BBT
In post 1361, Lapsa wrote:In post 1330, Titus wrote:@Lapsa, Yup. I never read on replacing in.
this is 3rd time I see you replacing in. in fact - invited you in current game. you know I know that's untrue
In post 1369, Plotinus wrote:and that’s why i started townreading bbt, because i could tell he’d picked up on my crumbs and was keeping the secret for me instead of pushing me. (and part of why i was suspicious of bella earlier was when she wouldn’t drop it but she’s sinced dropped it so that’s okay)
pedit: yeah. i am counterclaiming. no way both our roles fit in this setup
In post 1369, Plotinus wrote:pedit: yeah. i am counterclaiming. no way both our roles fit in this setup
