Mini Normal 1692 – A Crack In Time? – Game Over

Klingoncelt · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:30 pm

In post 222, Radja wrote:what's with all the fruit?

...

I didn't ask "Where", I asked "Why". Are you saying you did it because someone told you to? And you immediately changed your mindset?

Pointy suggested that I go ahead and throw a vote out there, of my strongest suspect. He said "More votes going out is arguably an ideal way to gain information, and not voting on principle is an easy way for scum to conceal their lack of reads. I'm inclined to agree that if you find someone scummy, you should vote them."

I don't see how it can gain information, but if Pointy thinks it helps Town, then sure, why not.

Ricastle · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:01 pm

It's not about wether they are easy targets in general. The solitary instances that you were/are attacking them over (the SK joke with Grib, and the Boon tunnel with Blue) were very much low-hanging fruit instances. Grib's was because you were jumping on him for what was obviously a mocking joke-claim. Blue's is because his push is undeniably extremely weak, unconvincing, and wrong, he was/is resultantly being opposed vehemently by a lot of players, and was the top wagon for most of the earlier game.

And with that I've destroyed all your points. Another argument won by the Castle.

Slandaar · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:04 pm

In post 186, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 185, Slandaar wrote:
In post 90, Boonskiies wrote:Slandaar - didn't know he was in this game. Cool. We'll probably have a face off later.

I'm town. Why would we 'probably have a face off' if you're town? It has never happened before.

Comes across like you
know
my alignment is opposite to yours.

I mean, TvT is a thing...

Didn't see this yesterday.

So, you think that we will probably have a face off which has NEVER happened before because TvT is a thing?

Doesn't make sense.

Slandaar · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:06 pm

In post 201, Klingoncelt wrote:Get well soon.

Thanks, you will be happy to know I am already back to full health!

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:05 pm

In post 213, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 211, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:

The lie occured in post 162
The backtrack occured in post 166

There's no lie in 162. 100% honesty there.

There's no lie in 162. 100% honesty there.

No backtracking at all. Are you sure you got the post numbers correct?

You say you do something as town
I find example where you don't do it as town

How is that not a lie? Oh wait, it is a lie.

So yeah...

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:07 pm

In post 217, Ricastle wrote:and Woody...both low-hanging fruit!

Ricastle · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:10 pm

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 11:34 pm

In post 229, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:How is that not a lie? Oh wait, it is a lie.

Then when you try to make an excuse for yourself, that's called backtracking.

You are so caught scum, just need others to realize it and Lynch you

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:23 am

Antiprod

I've been out of work for two days with no regular computer access, I'll be back today

Slandaar · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:45 am

In post 203, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 185, Slandaar wrote:
In post 90, Boonskiies wrote:Slandaar - didn't know he was in this game. Cool. We'll probably have a face off later.

I'm town. Why would we 'probably have a face off' if you're town? It has never happened before.

Comes across like you
know
my alignment is opposite to yours.

Oh shit, I missed this.

Boon is Town.

Don't know either way about Slandaar.

I don't understand your reaction.

I assume you disagree with my assessment of the situation. Why?

Slandaar · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:56 am

In post 229, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:You say you do something as town
I find example where you don't do it as town

Not exactly what happened.

'I like to do'
Doesn't mean they will never do otherwise.

I haven't looked but if her most recent completed town game was the one she didn't vote in for a while then there is nothing here at all. Otherwise her response is a little off as 'like' should be 'want'.

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:22 am

well if we are being technical, he never said "like to do" in the first place, he said he "doesn't like to" do something

but anyway, fine maybe it isn't an actual lie but it is suspicious to me when a player says they typically do something but when i try to find evidence of it I am unable to and then he makes an excuse for it. It is especially suspicious when you add in that this same player said he wanted to "slow things down" and their next post did the opposite of "slowing things down"

Slandaar · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:46 am

In post 236, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:typically do something but when i try to find evidence of it I am unable to and then he makes an excuse for it.

Preferences can change quickly.

Excuse or explanation for your findings?

WoodyWoodpecker · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:52 am

In post 237, Slandaar wrote:
In post 236, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:typically do something but when i try to find evidence of it I am unable to and then he makes an excuse for it.

Preferences can change quickly.

Excuse or explanation for your findings?

but he doesn't even follow his own preferences THIS game...

He votes Blue for "pinging" the loudest or whatever, pinging doesn't imply that he is sure, that implies that he just happens to be the most suspicious but certainly doesn't mean he is sure.

not sure what you mean by the 2nd part

Zoronos · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:59 am

Sorry, I've been super tuned out of this game because of all the 'omg he's scum because he posted once!' and "I caught you in a lie!1!" stuff.

I pressured her to vote. She said she didn't like to, but voted anyway. No lie there, it was a costless response to pressure. Can we dial down the rhetoric a tad please.
VOTE: Elusive. Active lurking (See: 212. Closest thing to a content post, and there's no actual content in it)

Boonskiies · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:43 am

In post 227, Slandaar wrote:
In post 186, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 185, Slandaar wrote:
In post 90, Boonskiies wrote:Slandaar - didn't know he was in this game. Cool. We'll probably have a face off later.

I'm town. Why would we 'probably have a face off' if you're town? It has never happened before.

Comes across like you
know
my alignment is opposite to yours.

I mean, TvT is a thing...

Didn't see this yesterday.

So, you think that we will probably have a face off which has NEVER happened before because TvT is a thing?

Doesn't make sense.

I mean, i seem to have predicted correctly.

Ricastle · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:50 am

Aneninen · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:56 am

You're not the only traveller group being on a mission.
Someone, somewhere must have done something and you've ended up in a strange situation.

One of the travellers has disappeared into nothingness and someone else has just appeared in The House. It's peculiar, because... you can't recall anything about the person who was here before and you feel as if the newcomer... had been here since the Trip started.

ChaosOmega has been replaced by Diego1487.

Diego1487 · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 7:16 am

Sup everyone, I've been reading along with this game. I'll start posting content shortly.

Slandaar · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:02 am

In post 240, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 227, Slandaar wrote:
In post 186, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 185, Slandaar wrote:
In post 90, Boonskiies wrote:Slandaar - didn't know he was in this game. Cool. We'll probably have a face off later.

I'm town. Why would we 'probably have a face off' if you're town? It has never happened before.

Comes across like you
know
my alignment is opposite to yours.

I mean, TvT is a thing...

Didn't see this yesterday.

So, you think that we will probably have a face off which has NEVER happened before because TvT is a thing?

Doesn't make sense.

I mean, i seem to have predicted correctly.

Yes, because you are scum as my original hypothesis suggested. The reason for said prediction not the prediction is what we were looking at Boon.

Boonskiies · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:27 am

Diego1487 · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:31 am

I'll start with the most obvious battle line of the day...Blue Moon vrs. Boon

Blue's tunnel is scummy. He accuses Boon of not scum hunting, Boon scum hunts(page 4), Blue ignores. Multiple people point this out, Blue ignores. There's an agenda here, whether it's personal or strategic is the question. I don't have the answer yet. Blue has since given up the Boon lynch, and has done shit.

tl;dr Blue pushed an agenda, failed, and now isn't helping town. Scum behavior

Boon's not perfect either. Was called out for not scum hunting, vomited on page 4, and hasn't done shit since. @boon: was your earlier activity solely reactive to the pressure, or have you just not found anything worthwhile to discuss lately?

Diego1487 · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:38 am

In post 239, Zoronos wrote:Sorry, I've been super tuned out of this game because of all the 'omg he's scum because he posted once!' and "I caught you in a lie!1!" stuff.

I pressured her to vote. She said she didn't like to, but voted anyway. No lie there, it was a costless response to pressure. Can we dial down the rhetoric a tad please.
VOTE: Elusive. Active lurking (See: 212. Closest thing to a content post, and there's no actual content in it)

So basically, you admit to active lurking, then turn around a vote someone for active lurking.

If you're sick of the current pace of play, best way to fix that is to contribute. Unless you're scum.

Diego1487 · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 9:42 am

In post 176, Ricastle wrote:I've concluded that Blue is a low-hanging VI. Let's all move onto Klingon/OGML.

What's with all this "low hangin fruit" mess?!

Can scum not turn out to be an easy target?

BlueMoonRising · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2015 10:05 am

I am hardly a VI. It's easy to call anyone a VI day 1 when there is no info available. It's also easy for people that are inactive or less active to pick on the active players.

Vote: Elusive