In post 852, Annadog40 wrote:This set up is closed so for all we know everyone is a power role except for the one Vanilla Town.
Yeah I can disprove this
UNVOTE:
VOTE: RC
In post 852, Annadog40 wrote:This set up is closed so for all we know everyone is a power role except for the one Vanilla Town.
In post 873, Persivul wrote:Are you willing to vote yourself then?
In post 879, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm going to continue attempting to lynch scum.
In post 862, havingfitz wrote:YurikoJasmine...who do you suspect?
Do you have any opinions you'd like to share?
Do you have a case on FA_Q you'd like to share?
How are the prospects of improved participation from you looking?
In post 852, Annadog40 wrote:This set up is closed so for all we know everyone is a power role except for the one Vanilla Town.
In post 883, RadiantCowbells wrote:I just switched my vote 5 times in 2 pages and you've decided that I'm town now?
In post 716, havingfitz wrote:@Slandaar...nothing is ridiculous with what I point out regarding your description of [how many votes you made]. All we have to go on in this game is the words we exchange with others so if saying [how many times you voted] cannot be taken literally...then why say [ - ] it? Why not just say [it was 3 votes]?
In post 885, YurikoJasmine wrote:
In post 852, Annadog40 wrote:This set up is closed so for all we know everyone is a power role except for the one Vanilla Town.
How do you know that everyone is a PR? How do you know there is one VT? Is it required for a closed setup?
In post 575, GlidingPigeon wrote:
That is scummy as hell. No lynch is a shitty option.
Um yeah that should have been kinda obvious...? Interesting.
In post 590, GlidingPigeon wrote:In post 583, Annadog40 wrote:No lynch only benefits scum! Everyone should at this point just focus and move their vote on the two leading votes.
This made me think that maybe the scum team have a strategy to not vote on the most popular wagons to achieve a no lynch. Some of you may have already thought of this. All the people not on the two popular wagons could be scum...? A no lynch sounds scummy, but I not exactly sure why it is.. If someone could explain that would be great.
In post 599, GlidingPigeon wrote:
See that's what I thought...but the explination did make sense i dont know I think we should lynch someone...
In post 740, GlidingPigeon wrote:
I also don't like his post #604 from day 1. He says: "I don't want to lynch FA or LQ so eh. I will hammer one of them if they are L-1 but I won't be around right till deadline so..."
I don't understand the reasoning behind this post... Seems like he is just giving himself an excuse to hop on either wagon and hammer. I know he didn't end up hoping on any of the wagons, but still I don't like the thought process of that post at all.
In post 481, Slandaar wrote:
In post 318, Drakced wrote:I've been voting BBmolla because he was being ridiculously defensive and rather hostile. But now, FA_Q2 has been getting more hostile then BB was. BB has calmed down, but is still active, not like a mafia would do and just disappear for a while. I'm thinking FAQ could be Mafia. Also, I don't really feel like LQ is scum.
VOTE: FA_Q2
- Drakced was 4th on Molla who he flipped his read on.
- Drakced was 5th on FAQ - Voting when FAQ wagon overtook Molla wagon.
- Flipped read on LQ when if he moves vote from FAQ to LQ it makes LQ leading wagon - no support for LQ lynch prior to this.
He is just moving to the largest wagon all the time.
In post 648, Slandaar wrote:In post 411, Drakced wrote:
I'm also not really seeing LQ as Scum. He seems like more of a newbie Town.
In post 465, Drakced wrote:I'm fine with an LQ lynch, even though I'm not totally scum reading him.
In post 467, Drakced wrote:
I said I'm nottotallyscum reading him. I'm thinking lean-Scum, not "LQ is definitely scum and we should lynch him right now."
In post 650, Slandaar wrote:I hear you ask what happened in those magical 50 posts where Drakced changed his read?
Allow me to enlighten you!
In post 460, Salamence20 wrote:In post 454, BBmolla wrote:In post 437, ChaosOmega wrote:RadiantCowbells (1) - whispersilk
YurikoJasmine (1) - RadiantCowbells
1baldeagle1 (1) - YurikoJasmine
Drakced (1) - Slandaar
BBmolla (1) - FA_Q2
whispersilk (1) - Salamence20
Salamence20 (1) - LicketyQuickety
All these people need to move their votes.
VOTE: LQ
In post 462, FA_Q2 wrote:I can go for an LQ lynch over that very bad lie and resulting piss poor excuse for it.
VOTE: LQ
In post 692, Slandaar wrote:In post 683, Drakced wrote:A. I hadn't been paying much attention to LQ and kind of just labeled him as newb town.
So you were making up reads. I do believe that.
In post 683, Drakced wrote:B. He didn't seem trustworthy, wasdefending him self very little, and just seemed kind of weak overall.Not scummy enough for me to vote for him, but enough for me to switch my opinion from newb town to lean scum.
So in effect he was an easy target.
I believe that too.
In post 772, Slandaar wrote:In post 739, Drakced wrote:But you still think she could be scum, Persivul.
After my null read on Anna, I ISO'ed her and she doesn't seem scum, but not particularly towny either.
Persivul votes Anna.
In post 761, Drakced wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHYiyv68q2o
Persivul, I think Anna is townish and the pool parties are just for fun
In conclusion Anna and Drakced are weak players so they are not scum. Persivul is the scum. He only votes easy wagons Anna, Drakced, Fitz and myself after I said I was lurking.
VOTE: Persivul
In post 869, Slandaar wrote:A step by step guide on Drakced's reads by Slandaar:
Step 1. Find the most suspected players in the game by town. Call them Scum.
Step 2. Check if any previous reads are now not suspected. Call them town.
Step 3. Always call Anna null except when she gets a vote then call her townish.
If ever questioned on your reads reply that you ISOed them.
Behold!
In post 712, Drakced wrote:
RC: Lean Town: Did some actions that seemed like something only town would do.
In post 867, Drakced wrote:FA_Q2, Slandaar, and RC I guess
So, Drakced, what changed?
In post 712, Drakced wrote:Gypsy Girl: Null: Not really sure.
Annadog: Null: Not sure either.
Yuriko: Null: Maybe town, seems sorta weak.
You had Yuriko and OK you called Anna townish earlier and then you had GG who is null too but poor RC must have dropped down your reads list?!
In post 773, Slandaar wrote:RC is scum he is trying to whiteknight me.
In post 834, Slandaar wrote:VOTE: RC
In post 882, Slandaar wrote:Anyways I don't really think RC is scum. (I ISOed him)
In post 858, havingfitz wrote:Slandaar...what is a motion detector and how does it work?
In post 892, Slandaar wrote:I should also say lynching RC is terrible. It is obvious who is town because the townies all have wagons form easily, yet, when you have Townced who never gets any votes you have to wonder how he does it that paragon of town-ness he is.
Fitz wagon failing was suspicious. I would say he fits with Townced but he is town. Then there is GG and Yuri who does nothing and then Anna...