TempBan for Players Who Sign Up and Refuse To Play

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #34 (isolation #0) » Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:10 am

Post by Wisdom »

Yep. Blacklisting is the answer if you really can't take the way someone is (not) playing.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #38 (isolation #1) » Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:43 pm

Post by Wisdom »

People who dont care generally dont care whether they're lynched either

So that doesn't help
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #61 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:23 am

Post by Wisdom »

In post 56, Plotinus wrote:what is the difference between wisdom of the one and wisdom of the mod and wisdom of the crowd?

someone correct me if wrong;

Wisdom of the One: One person can kick someone they don't want to play with out, providing they signed up before that person.
Wisdom of the Crowd: More than one players (number depending on mod) request they want a player kicked.

Wisdom of the Mod is simply a mod rejecting a player because they don't want them in their game.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #69 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:52 pm

Post by Wisdom »

In post 65, saulres wrote:Maybe in my next game I'll add a rule for removing players who are objectionable to the masses. Like in addition to voting, you could use the Hurt tag and if the same number of people needed to lynch Hurt a player, that player is force-replaced. That means town doesn't have to waste a policy lynch.

Usable only during D1 (maybe D2, and probably usable on any replacement who comes in on a later day, for one game day).


That sounds exploitable. Like, there's player X who is very good at being unreadable so town decides to hurt them out of the game so they can get someone more readable. Isn't that unfair to that player?

On the other hand, if you make it so that you have a say on the situation and force-replace only if you feel the player deserves it rather than just do it when Hurt reaches majority, you get into the situation Kagami described.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #88 (isolation #4) » Sun Jul 12, 2015 7:45 am

Post by Wisdom »

The point is you can't prove they're playing against wincon. They might be posting nothing but still read and vote accurately.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #92 (isolation #5) » Sun Jul 12, 2015 12:15 pm

Post by Wisdom »

It is frustrating sure, but you can't ask for bans on people because you don't like how they're playing. Just avoid playing with them.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #95 (isolation #6) » Sun Jul 12, 2015 3:51 pm

Post by Wisdom »

yeah I don't think there are that many town players who don't read and don't vote - for the rare instances that do exist, blacklist/wotc them and move on.

I understand the problem of them replacing in, but there's nothing you can do about that except hope your mod cares about their playerlist and doesn't let such players get into their games.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #120 (isolation #7) » Mon Aug 10, 2015 7:16 am

Post by Wisdom »

Yep. Players can play to their wincon just fine even without having read a single word.

Return to “Mafia Discussion”