In post 103, pistachi0n wrote:I'm town-reading Thesp for the questions he asked. It gave us a lot of information, not because of the answers themselves, but because of what people thought of the questions and how people responded to other people's answers to the questions. It started discussion, that's a good thing.
In post 102, Thesp wrote:Would it make a difference if you were to learn that I always open games by asking questions of everyone?
In post 113, RadiantCowbells wrote:How is it "tunneling" to push a wagon in RVS? That's how you end RVS to get into real content. Firebringer was not confirmed scum because of his defensiveness, but it would have been a way better lead into the game than we ended up getting.
In post 110, Firebringer wrote:
I thought I did....
I think I unvoted him because he was tunneling me so hard I didn't think Scum would do that.
Anyways, he is using horrible logic and I think he could be scum trying to FoS me and label you as Scum for calling him out on his bad logic.
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
In post 114, Firebringer wrote:so far Radiant all thats been proven is you are bad town at worse or bad scum. Your pressure on me was fine but your reasons faulty (you make up stuff in RVS and say it isn't RVS when everyone around here knows it is) then you push a lynch on Alchemist saying he is TOWN but bad.
In post 129, RadiantCowbells wrote:Would you all agree that I'm either causing or contributing to a negative play experience in this game?
In post 9, RadiantCowbells wrote:I want your soul roasted on a spit.
In post 12, RadiantCowbells wrote:I didn't reaction test at all, besides the vote on you which is exactly what you do in RVS; randomly vote.
Firebringer is awfully defensive.
In post 36, RadiantCowbells wrote:Alright.
I'm really feeling a Thesp/Firebringer scumteam because I placed a non-RVS on Fire and Thesp immediately tries to reset the game by asking a random question.
Forget about that crap, vote Fire.
In post 66, RadiantCowbells wrote:There's a definite deliberateness to the post.
I'm not buying that he didn't read my vote, and I'm not buying that he just decided to ignore it and ask pointless random questions, especially since he specifically requested that everyone respond, ie drop what they're doing and answer his questions that aren't related to the game.
In post 79, RadiantCowbells wrote:
...
Firebringer may still be scum, but Cowbells is trying unnaturally hard to paint Thesp as scummy no matter what, and her logic is reachy as hell.
You're either stupid or scum.
VOTE: Alchemist21
I think Firebringer might have been a red herring and now we have Alchemist chainsawing Thesp because I wouldn't drop the issue.
In post 80, RadiantCowbells wrote:
...
Shitty town players are higher priority lynches than scum.
I don't think it's likely that you're really chainsawing Thesp this hard, but I do think you're going to be a liability as long as you're alive so I'm going to rid myself of it.
In post 84, RadiantCowbells wrote:Last time I left a bunch of terrible town players alive I got mislynched D3 and they couldn't lynch the last scum in 4 day phases.
My literal last words were calling that person out for deliberately misrepresenting me.
So no, I don't care if it's TvT. That's not happening again.
In post 119, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm feeling really shitty about mafia right now.
I don't feel like doing this.
In post 129, RadiantCowbells wrote:Would you all agree that I'm either causing or contributing to a negative play experience in this game?
In post 119, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm feeling really shitty about mafia right now.
I don't feel like doing this.
In post 124, All Alone wrote:In post 102, Thesp wrote:In post 87, All Alone wrote:This comment from Thesp looks like scumhunting but really isn't. He's not analyzing Pistachi0n's alignment, he's not asking her anything meaningful. It's like information instead of analysis, except it's not even informative.
This is fair - though I was really hoping to see pistachi0n's next post before I comment further on this.
Pistachi0n posted after this in 103, and your 109 didn't comment further on it. Why not?
In post 129, RadiantCowbells wrote:Would you all agree that I'm either causing or contributing to a negative play experience in this game?
In post 137, Alchemist21 wrote:@Thesp, if you liked my points on RC, AND think that types who attack your RQS like she did tend to be scum, then why aren't you voting her instead of someone who only has a single post in the game?
In post 126, All Alone wrote:I don't understand why you're townreading him for something he always does regardless of alignment.
In post 136, Netherspite wrote:The wagon consists of:
- you, who look like opportunistic scum.
How is it not scum driven?
In post 138, duppin wrote:No I said his read makes sense, because I got the impression he thought you were telling him his read was wrong, but him not voting on Thesp was weird.
I believe RC is town and it seems like an easy train for scum to pile up on considering she did state the wouldn't mind voting on a town. But I just have a hard time imaging a scum playing like that. I am not too fond of her train to be honest. I like Alchemist, Quaroath's reaction to RC question him was fairly weird. First he voted on Thesp (so I assume he agreed with RC) but then he changed his vote to RC later as well. Not entirely sure what to make of Firebringer at the moment though.