In post 796, Boonskiies wrote:Also this
What these links bring us to is that Mario /in'd for a new game 3 days after being replaced here. The link in this post shows him posting elsewhere DURING the time he was absent in this thread, INCLUDING the day of his replacement and days right previous. He was purposely avoiding.
In post 804, Boonskiies wrote:Yeah, it's a crappy reason, but one that has proven to work.
@Grayfoxxxx - you'd be surprised how often I catch scum by OMGUS.
In post 792, dragonspawn wrote:I'm not really liking the push on fa. I understand boons reasoning for it but the other votes are just making me uneasy.
In post 808, Kublai Khan wrote:Okay. Sorry. Life event got me behind. I'll be caught up and have a big post by tomorrow night.
implosion wrote:I've given a number of townreads (dragon, woody, shazam) and a current scumread on NE; I gave a scumread on foxxxx which I've since retracted, and a weak scumread on Boon, which I've since retracted (he's now in the townread pile, foxxxx is null). I can go in-depth into any involved reasoning if desired.
Another point I have been harping on, and will harp on more: KK really has not towntold yet. Everything he's done so far is just pure reasoning; it isn't necessarily a towntell for him just because you agree with his reasoning. I'd like to hear from Boon why KK is town.
In post 792, dragonspawn wrote:I'm not really liking the push on fa. I understand boons reasoning for it but the other votes are just making me uneasy.
In post 740, implosion wrote:I think I agree with boon's assessment of FA's most recent slew of posts. Something about the way he frames Woody/boon's interaction feels off. He just says that he doesn't like them because of the exchange without any further explanation, but it seems strange that the first thing that would come to mind after such a heated back-and-forth exchange would be that they both become scummier for having been involved. It just feels like an excuse to vote Woody and lead in to a Boon fos tomorrow. He talks about information from the lynch in the case that we get scum, but lynching scum is almost always going to give useful information.
I feel like taking this argument and framing it as "there's probably scum amongst the two of them" is a fairly likely scum tactic. And I don't see it as being a likely reaction to the argument as town. So. This is further strengthened to some degree by my still thinking both of them are town.
I also have a good initial impression of Annarchy's (Stubbs replacement) opening.
Unvote
VOTE: FA
Still have a (decently) strong scumread on the NE slot, contingent of course on spicer's posting. But my votes have been dead ends for pretty much this entire day, and I think I'm happy with this vote right now.
In post 819, Shazam wrote:I want everyone to get caught up, but once that happens, we're beginning to run out of time. It would be good for everyone to think of a few people they'd be ok lynching and start zeroing in on some players that could actually be lynched.
In post 817, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 792, dragonspawn wrote:I'm not really liking the push on fa. I understand boons reasoning for it but the other votes are just making me uneasy.
?
How do you understand boons read - it is essentially a huge OMGUS. I read boon as scum for essentially the exact same reasoning that he read Mario as scum - his game is 180 from every town game I have played with him. Something is very off with boon's play. He reminds me a lot of scum wolf right now tbh.
In post 812, TheDominator37 wrote:Town
Dom
Dragon
Pisskop
Grayfoxx
KK
Boon
Anarcy
Fa
Wood
Spicer
Bulbazoor
Shazam
Implosion
Scum