In post 42, DeasVail wrote:Anyway has anyone actually seen early wagons become early mislynches or why do you fear it particularly now or what?
In post 47, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 46, Garmr wrote:Also would like to mention this but it seems like fraggers is just doing a massive chainsaw attempt on blocky if its for a scum buddy or a buddying attempt on town not sure yet.
Also this post is interesting. Having this amount of votes in rvs votes in this amount of time is normal. It kinda makes me curious what type of experience block has had with rvs before.
I've played with Blocky before so I'm quite fairly confident on my reads on him. I saw a opportunistic chance for scum to jump on a wagon, so I posted what I believed to be weird & that I've flagged so far. Quite odd you think early scum hunting is me trying to chainsaw someone. Does my early analysis worry you because you could potentially be scum?
In post 51, Garmr wrote:In post 47, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 46, Garmr wrote:Also would like to mention this but it seems like fraggers is just doing a massive chainsaw attempt on blocky if its for a scum buddy or a buddying attempt on town not sure yet.
Also this post is interesting. Having this amount of votes in rvs votes in this amount of time is normal. It kinda makes me curious what type of experience block has had with rvs before.
I've played with Blocky before so I'm quite fairly confident on my reads on him. I saw a opportunistic chance for scum to jump on a wagon, so I posted what I believed to be weird & that I've flagged so far. Quite odd you think early scum hunting is me trying to chainsaw someone. Does my early analysis worry you because you could potentially be scum?
You also pushed everyone on the blocky wagon as potential scum and now your omgusing because I think your scum. That doesn't ring town to me. Early scum hunting doesn't typically involve trying to tear down a wagon with out giving a reason why you think that someone is town then trying to push that everyone on the wagon is scummy.
In post 52, yoloswag123 wrote:Fragger:man this dude conflicts with my views therefore he's scum (but seriously that last bit looks like yet another smearing attempt :/,) Also a chainsaw is rather HOW you went about your analysis and rereading the post i have to agree that it comes off as a way to try to paint all the people on the wagon as scummy.
PEDIT: all those posts 0_0
PEDIT: you're smearing him by going "Or is there a underlying issue of you jumping on a scum buddies wagon early hidden under a veil?" which just comes off as across trying to make him look worse than he actually is. Why else would you include it otherwise? I stated in another post that I felt that blocky's reactions were quite strong to a few votes and that i wanted to hear from him though.
In post 53, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 51, Garmr wrote:In post 47, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 46, Garmr wrote:Also would like to mention this but it seems like fraggers is just doing a massive chainsaw attempt on blocky if its for a scum buddy or a buddying attempt on town not sure yet.
Also this post is interesting. Having this amount of votes in rvs votes in this amount of time is normal. It kinda makes me curious what type of experience block has had with rvs before.
I've played with Blocky before so I'm quite fairly confident on my reads on him. I saw a opportunistic chance for scum to jump on a wagon, so I posted what I believed to be weird & that I've flagged so far. Quite odd you think early scum hunting is me trying to chainsaw someone. Does my early analysis worry you because you could potentially be scum?
You also pushed everyone on the blocky wagon as potential scum and now your omgusing because I think your scum. That doesn't ring town to me. Early scum hunting doesn't typically involve trying to tear down a wagon with out giving a reason why you think that someone is town then trying to push that everyone on the wagon is scummy.
I'm not OMGUSing at all. I don't care if you read me scum or not. I know what my alignment is. Before you try to mis-rep me again, I said out of those votes I think there's at least one or maybe two scum who voted on that wagon. A very logical thought process to have. You can try to spin it that I'm "tearing down a wagon". I simply stated that it's odd for that many to "RVS" vote for a single player at game start. Regardless if it's a pressure wagon.
Quite odd you think early scum hunting is me trying to chainsaw someone. Does my early analysis worry you because you could potentially be scum?
Before you try to mis-rep me again
In post 49, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 39, redFF wrote:i think yr reading too much into rvs man. Deasvail's vote is his first post, no need to take it so serious. that seems like a whole lot of analysis for a frivolous first page wagon.
fraggernaut coming in with the quad post and the excuse for being late even tho he's really not that late. sketchy.
I would consider it late seeing as I only had a little over a day to respond or I would of been replaced. Especially after one page had already gone by. To me that's late.
In post 50, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 42, DeasVail wrote:Anyway has anyone actually seen early wagons become early mislynches or why do you fear it particularly now or what?
I think early lynches are generally bad, but no one on this train said "lets lynch this guy now" it was all pressure. I would like to hear more from Blocky his defense has been lack luster.
BTW its not RVS vote anymore, its now actual pressure.
It had five votes on it already, so of course I would fear a early mislynch happening especially if somehow scum were able to hammer it. Could it happen? I think it could if someone wasn't paying attention to the votes. It's always something to fear regardless if someone is just fishing for pressure reactions.
In post 58, Firebringer wrote:
In post 50, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 42, DeasVail wrote:Anyway has anyone actually seen early wagons become early mislynches or why do you fear it particularly now or what?
I think early lynches are generally bad, but no one on this train said "lets lynch this guy now" it was all pressure. I would like to hear more from Blocky his defense has been lack luster.
BTW its not RVS vote anymore, its now actual pressure.
It had five votes on it already, so of course I would fear a early mislynch happening especially if somehow scum were able to hammer it. Could it happen? I think it could if someone wasn't paying attention to the votes. It's always something to fear regardless if someone is just fishing for pressure reactions.
It could be a mislynch or just a lucky lynch on scum. So quick to think the worst. Possible cautious town or possibly scum trying to make sure his teammate doesn't get lynched. Making a note of your defense of Blocky, could be nothing. Or could be a scum indication later.
In post 61, Slandaar wrote:I'm town.
That's all I have to say. Quick, easy to read, straight to the point and very informative.
In post 57, Fraggernaut wrote:@Garmr maybe it's the fact that I just really don't care if you read me scum? Theres that. Check the META on me,I'm snarky regardless especially as town when someone has a completely wrong read on me as you do right now.
@Sword any other logic behind that vote?
In post 61, Slandaar wrote:I'm town.
That's all I have to say. Quick, easy to read, straight to the point and very informative.
In post 63, Garmr wrote:In post 57, Fraggernaut wrote:@Garmr maybe it's the fact that I just really don't care if you read me scum? Theres that. Check the META on me,I'm snarky regardless especially as town when someone has a completely wrong read on me as you do right now.
@Sword any other logic behind that vote?
I thought you were pushing a scum read on me but the language in bold suggest that you are treating me as town. What changed your view if you are reading me as town or if you still think I'm scum why would you think I would have to have read on you???
@fire bringer
His got 11 post what about his content after the initial one?
In post 67, Firebringer wrote:In post 63, Garmr wrote:In post 57, Fraggernaut wrote:@Garmr maybe it's the fact that I just really don't care if you read me scum? Theres that. Check the META on me,I'm snarky regardless especially as town when someone has a completely wrong read on me as you do right now.
@Sword any other logic behind that vote?
I thought you were pushing a scum read on me but the language in bold suggest that you are treating me as town. What changed your view if you are reading me as town or if you still think I'm scum why would you think I would have to have read on you???
@fire bringer
His got 11 post what about his content after the initial one?
You asked for Blocky not Fraggernaut. Blocky has 6 posts and and only two with any 'content'. I have no opinion on Fraggernaut except he is try hard right out of the gate.
Pedit: Don't we all?
In post 67, Firebringer wrote:Pedit: Don't we all?
In post 63, Garmr wrote:In post 57, Fraggernaut wrote:@Garmr maybe it's the fact that I just really don't care if you read me scum? Theres that. Check the META on me,I'm snarky regardless especially as town when someone has a completely wrong read on me as you do right now.
@Sword any other logic behind that vote?
I thought you were pushing a scum read on me but the language in bold suggest that you are treating me as town. What changed your view if you are reading me as town or if you still think I'm scum why would you think I would have to have read on you???
@fire bringer
His got 11 post what about his content after the initial one?
In post 72, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 63, Garmr wrote:In post 57, Fraggernaut wrote:@Garmr maybe it's the fact that I just really don't care if you read me scum? Theres that. Check the META on me,I'm snarky regardless especially as town when someone has a completely wrong read on me as you do right now.
@Sword any other logic behind that vote?
I thought you were pushing a scum read on me but the language in bold suggest that you are treating me as town. What changed your view if you are reading me as town or if you still think I'm scum why would you think I would have to have read on you???
@fire bringer
His got 11 post what about his content after the initial one?
When did I say I'm reading you town?Also when have I pushed a scum read on you?
In post 47, Fraggernaut wrote:
I've played with Blocky before so I'm quite fairly confident on my reads on him. I saw a opportunistic chance for scum to jump on a wagon, so I posted what I believed to be weird & that I've flagged so far. Quite odd you think early scum hunting is me trying to chainsaw someone.Does my early analysis worry you because you could potentially be scum?
Which brings me to the point that do you have info that others don't that makes it so you don't have to have a read on someone? Especially this early in the game you seem pretty certain that I'm the be-all end all scum of this game.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}