In post 2005, Psychlone wrote: In post 1958, Seiko x Naomi wrote:she also tried to claim I was "lying" about her meta by linking a game I *wasn't even in*, when I had 1. linked the game I was referring to, 2. outright stated GIF and I had hydra'ed in the game in my actual post. what does this make more sense as? town who actually believes what they're saying (the fact it's Titus does not change this - I strictly maintain that if you sit down and look at it for a while you can kinda sorta see where her thought processes are coming from when she's town)? or scum who isn't sure how to respond, so they start flooding the thread with bullshit which is blatantly false in order to get people to accept it as truth without actually reading it (which, surprise, is something that she does in the vast majority of her scum games)?
Wouldn't mind Titus responding to this.
Seiko outright said that she was in "Faith Plus One" and that I was scum. The statement is untrue. As far as her "link" is concerned, I didn't and don't care. Her link cannot prove I was scum in a game where I was town.
She does this repeated moving the goalposts thing, so I am not inclined to think this was a mistake. How often do people a meta dive, mention a game, but explicitly want the results of some games discounted but not others?
She's maintaining that I flood the thread with bullshit when I don't know how to respond. As seen in my thread on how to read myself, I don't bullshit or lie as scum, as I am not good at it and its not very effective.
For someone who meta dived me, I find it hard to believe that they missed the fact that her push (minus the consultant thing) looks like every other mislynched, such as XMEN and Pathfinder. Push Titus so hard with so much bullshit and then blame her for wasted or spammy posting when she defends herself. That way if the lynch fails, there's still policy.
She's claiming that the consultant/helpful isn't the only thing in her case. Just like my push on Varsoon wasn't a push. She retcons that and says that wasn't the point and she can't sum up her point on me "pushing" or "not pushing" Varsoon in a sentence or two.
It's a constant set of moving goalposts so she doesn't have to interact with me. She's all too happy to use the trap excuse ika provides but really any excuse to not interact with me is fine by Seiko.