In post 116, Rainbow Unicat wrote:5 I appreciate this post from Parama because I’ve never played this setup before and it appears that they have, but I’m wondering why they didn’t hold back this information until they could catch someone behaving incorrectly.
In post 116, Rainbow Unicat wrote:24 I’m still appreciating the mafia theory from parama because I’d be lost in this setup without it but I’m going to ISO him when I’m done catching up to double check the scumhunting/mafia theory ratio.
--Plotinus
In post 121, Rainbow Unicat wrote:was the “good enough or me” in 17 directed at notmafia since you said you didn’t mean to quote irish pope but i couldn’t figure out who you were talking to then.
in which direction is the irish pope’s meta thing swaying you in 71?
In post 123, Lucky2u wrote:Hmm... Being such a universal scum read, it reminds me of my early mafia days as lynch bait. It's ok.
In post 118, Rainbow Unicat wrote:bins54 what was his alignment in the games you looked at? i think i’d probably only fake an “i promise i’m town and i never lie as scum” trust tell as scum, too. so there is that.
In post 119, Rainbow Unicat wrote:bins97 yeah, apparently neither of us were feeling it yesterday. it’s not alignment indicative. please read on based on what we are doing not what we're not doing.
In post 112, chamber wrote:Redcoyote is a pretty good player. I suspect he would have put forward the idea for the same reason I did, it's obviously the better way to play it. Lying about theoretical things is difficult because you need to actually be able to justify yourself concretely.
In post 127, Parama wrote:i'm slightly bothered because plot's catchup read is the kind of post i'd make as scum, a lot of it feels like fluff or retreading things other people have said, there's some points there but not many strong conclusions taken from the read
but maybe it's just me since hey at least he's posting content unlike some people
In post 131, Bins wrote:and actually not commenting on other groups is really, REALLY bad
because it gives scum a really easy opportunity not to make association tells with their partner
In post 126, Rainbow Unicat wrote:Finally finished trying to make sense of Bins' ISO.
VOTE: InflateablePie
bella, you can change this if you want if you explain it to me. let's talk sometime later.
reads:
town to scum:
bins, inflatablepie
parama, {chamber, theirishpope} (not sure about the order here)
not mafia, edosurist, lucky2u
not all that confident in any of these, for what it's worth.
--Plotinus
In post 130, Parama wrote:i don't know if lucky is actually mafia or just really stupid town, but i'm absolutely sure about this. chamber is scum.
In post 136, Parama wrote:okay for whatever reason the normal quote button is acting like multiquote and then since i write my posts in a completely different tab than the one i quote in it's adding all my quotes to the post after because they're still in the multiquote buffer, even though i'm not clicking the multiquote button to begin with? oy vey.
In post 129, Parama wrote:In post 112, chamber wrote:Redcoyote is a pretty good player. I suspect he would have put forward the idea for the same reason I did, it's obviously the better way to play it. Lying about theoretical things is difficult because you need to actually be able to justify yourself concretely.
okay in hindsight holy hell is this disgusting
you go:
1. redcoyote is a good player (which has no relevance here)
2. he put forward the idea for the same reason i did (implying that you are also a good player)
3. "it's obvious" is a blatant lie, because i disagree, as did pretty much every townie in that game
4. if it WAS obvious there's no point in Red saying it in that game and you saying it in this game? surely it would go without saying, right?
5. on that note, what benefit does scum have of putting forth the "better way to play" if it doesn't benefit them in some way? that just suggests that it benefits scum more than it benefits town
6. in this specific post, your "justification" is "it's obvious", which i'm pretty sure is not justifying it concretely
and then your justification in the next post is that scumhunting outside of groups is "wasted effort", pretending that that is something that exists in a mafia game (it doesn't, really, becauseit's a game)
yeah no, you're hiding behind a "good player" curtain to try and defend a really bad way of playing this setup. i feel like you didn't see the other game when you argued against scumhunting between groups, saw it when i brought it up, and then had to retroactively defend your stance so you weren't obvious scum, but the defense is full of holes
UNVOTE:
VOTE: chamber
