In post 472, ika wrote:i would say most if not all have already been asnwered by my iso.
Just answer the questions.
In post 472, ika wrote:i would say most if not all have already been asnwered by my iso.
In post 475, Shinobi wrote:In post 472, ika wrote:i would say most if not all have already been asnwered by my iso.
Just answer the questions.
In post 475, Shinobi wrote:In post 472, ika wrote:i would say most if not all have already been asnwered by my iso.
Just answer the questions.
In post 476, Wake1 wrote:In post 475, Shinobi wrote:In post 472, ika wrote:i would say most if not all have already been asnwered by my iso.
Just answer the questions.
Interesting movement by Shinobi to ika regarding all this.
Somewhat convincing. Somewhat.
Maybe,maybeslightly contrived and ever-so-gently forced....
In post 460, Wake1 wrote:
1)What do you feel about Lapsa saying SW was confScum? I asked him 'according to what.' What do you think?
dont care
2)Do you think, since Boons and ika can hammer L-1, that they'd both hammer someone at L-2? I know that question is less pertinent, but I'd like to know what people think on this regardless.
dont care
3)What do you think of Wolfie's play so far, and what do you think she's capable of?
irreivent
4)Since you are self-aware of your own play, are you willing to point out any of your alignment-indicative behaviors?
wifom arguments
5)Do you think we should speedlynch, or take our time? Not asking that we drag it to the last day, but at least use our time somewhat wisely.
dont care
6)Who do you want to hear more from? Who needs more pressure?
dont care, dont care
7)On my 441, I don't think players should be implying players are Town based on the assumption the game is singleball. I don't make assumptions: I keep all possibilities in the back of my mind, and play accordingly.
comment not question
8)What do you think of 442 where I spoke with nosferatu about sheeping?
dont care
In post 482, Mahonster wrote:That was actually hilarious.
In post 481, ika wrote:who said i was apathetic? and who said i wasnt seriously participating?
In post 443, Wake1 wrote:
Hm.
Could you please share in further detail why exactly you're voting for him?
In post 484, Nosferatu wrote:In post 481, ika wrote:who said i was apathetic? and who said i wasnt seriously participating?
You can't even (bother to) spell all of the words in your sentences correctly.
In post 487, Creede73 wrote:Ika, I can use a bunch of your posts to "prove" that you don't really care all that much about this game. How about the one where you said "I don't care" or "irrelevant" to a bunch of questions? Oh, and what Nos said.
In post 483, ika wrote:In post 482, Mahonster wrote:That was actually hilarious.
hi there, how ar eyou
got any town reads that you would liek to share?
In post 488, ika wrote:In post 487, Creede73 wrote:Ika, I can use a bunch of your posts to "prove" that you don't really care all that much about this game. How about the one where you said "I don't care" or "irrelevant" to a bunch of questions? Oh, and what Nos said.
thats doesnt mean i dont care about the game.
and as i said before my not correcting typing is normal. shall i link you to my past games?
In post 480, Creede73 wrote:For the enjoyment of the game, should we just lynch ika? I'm not saying he looks super scummy, but his apathy and refusal to seriously participate kinda bothers me.
In post 493, Lapsa wrote:@ika did you notice that Nanite got replaced by red?
In post 489, Mahonster wrote:I would call Wake town unless Nos flips scum. At that point I would investigate things.