In post 821, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I get the feeling that FB is taking this a solo game, when it is very much a team game. If he is town, it would make for a far better team effort if he tried to communicate without so much hostility. You don't need to be friends with someone to not be rude.
p-edit: See Polar's post. MS said, "Even if I'm lying, I'm still town."
1) That's not a admission.
2)in a game if mafia you trust no one. None of you are trustworthy as of yet. Maybe Bojack but I am not sure flavor confirms alignment yet.
3) you been reading your own posts about hostility? Really?
Hey pot meet kettle.
In post 824, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:There's a difference between discussion and antagonism. You accuse me of antagonism, but when people post things looking for feedback, and your feedback is "You're a bad player. This post is boring." the reaction is not going to be very favorable to you.
What?
You can discuss and be antagonistic at same time you dolt.
That's absolutely clearly an admission. And I'm not sure how 2 is relevant in any way... ETL is completly right about mafia being a team game. If you are serial killer, yes, you go alone. If you're scum you can try going alone by bussing partners. But town needs to do what town does, working together
In post 824, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:There's a difference between discussion and antagonism. You accuse me of antagonism, but when people post things looking for feedback, and your feedback is "You're a bad player. This post is boring." the reaction is not going to be very favorable to you.
In post 824, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:There's a difference between discussion and antagonism. You accuse me of antagonism, but when people post things looking for feedback, and your feedback is "You're a bad player. This post is boring." the reaction is not going to be very favorable to you.
What?
You can discuss and be antagonistic at same time you dolt.
One doesn't exclude the other.
Yes, but the correct response to disagreeing is certainly not going ad hominem, but rather "I disagree because...". See the because? That's the key word in the sentence. Giving reasons. We feel you haven't done that.
In post 828, Polar Vortex wrote:That's absolutely clearly an admission. And I'm not sure how 2 is relevant in any way... ETL is completly right about mafia being a team game. If you are serial killer, yes, you go alone. If you're scum you can try going alone by bussing partners. But town needs to do what town does, working together
Wrong it isn't a admission.
Wouldn't stand up in a courtroom. Doesn't stand up here.
He admits he isn't cop by saying "I am not cop" that is a admission. See the difference?
Also you work together with players you think are on your team but so far I have no good scum reads besides perhaps ETL to think any of you are town.
In post 824, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:There's a difference between discussion and antagonism. You accuse me of antagonism, but when people post things looking for feedback, and your feedback is "You're a bad player. This post is boring." the reaction is not going to be very favorable to you.
What?
You can discuss and be antagonistic at same time you dolt.
One doesn't exclude the other.
Yes, but the correct response to disagreeing is certainly not going ad hominem, but rather "I disagree because...". See the because? That's the key word in the sentence. Giving reasons. We feel you haven't done that.
I feel like we should sit down and talk things out because if we are calm and civil it will be easier to find scum.
Wait you are saying hostility and aggression are apart of human experience
That these emotions are key to expressing how a person thinks and feels?
That if we examine why they express these emotions we might better understand them?
Hmm that's no way to play. Mafia is a game of logic, not psychology.
We are here to lie and spot liars, not be dicks.
In post 833, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:And the only reason you think I'm scum is because you don't like my attitude towards you, as you have admitted.
That is not a good reason.
In post 834, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:You like MS because he was nice to you. You liked Polar because he unvoted you, where you were scumreading him before, suddenly you weren't.
This is not scumhunting at all.
I changed my mind in Polar because scum aren't tunneled, which is why I think I could be wrong about you right now btw.
So yeah.
Also ignore me pressuring Kaboose.
I admitted my attitude on you might be clouding my judgement, and that is me being honest about it.
Well, we're 11 players here. We'll be the jury. 9 of us think it was a lie and think the accuser has confesed to his sinful ways. One of the juries is the defendent for some strange beaurocratic reasons. Should we not pass the sentence as a lie because one of the juries classified the admission as technically not one, even if the meaning is clear. Or don't you find the meaning clear?
Well, we're 11 players here. We'll be the jury. 9 of us think it was a lie and think the accuser has confesed to his sinful ways. One of the juries is the defendent for some strange beaurocratic reasons. Should we not pass the sentence as a lie because one of the juries classified the admission as technically not one, even if the meaning is clear. Or don't you find the meaning clear?
You realize with jurry it has to be unanimous decision right?
Also we are 8 players minus one for Sonic who is on trial.
I am V/LA starting now until Friday morning, just FYI. I will try to check in at least once tomorrow when I jump into work for an hour, but otherwise, I'm not here.
anyway, firebringer at the very least MS has been misleading. I feel like you're bending over backwards to minimize that when if you're town you should be thinking about it squarely - what town benefit and what scum benefit could accrue from his actions.
Yes, that's exactly it. Keep on scumming.![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
