In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
A few things could make someone scum. Mostly bad lines of logic,
Nope.
In life everyone has bad ideas from time to time it does not mean they had an ulterior motive for it. Some peoples logic is better than others it doesn't mean the ones with worse logic are planning a killing spree.
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
and contextual interactions with others can reveal them to the town.
That actually sounds very good! Can you please show me some of these contextual interactions which reveal scum to the town please?
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
All of this can be observed. No "gut feelings", or "meta", or, "I dont like his attitude",that can be used instead of actual evidence.
Do I think it was useful to him? Maybe. Maybe not.
Maybe, Maybe not again eh? Maybe you should think about it and have an actual opinion.
Was there a reason other than to get a lynch through?
What kind of answer will help Scorpious read the player? Obviously as town that was the motivation and as scum you won't get another answer as it's a fine reason... seems like a pointless question eh?
@Slandaar,do you really think a wagon on me will form based on you having an issue with me using ISO?
I like your scum hunting.. I do. But I feel like your case is a major reach,and seeing whoever buys into it will give you an idea who is being opportunistic and sheepish. I also do that. I'd like to think your reasoning on me would go beyond the use of ISO. You seem too smart to base a scum read on that.
What do you think about Firebringer flat out refusing to answer questions? Shouldn't that be more of a red flag?
"Would you like to know more?"
I am like a renaissance artist. People appreciate me more after I am dead
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
A few things could make someone scum. Mostly bad lines of logic,
Nope.
In life everyone has bad ideas from time to time it does not mean they had an ulterior motive for it. Some peoples logic is better than others it doesn't mean the ones with worse logic are planning a killing spree.
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
and contextual interactions with others can reveal them to the town.
That actually sounds very good! Can you please show me some of these contextual interactions which reveal scum to the town please?
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
All of this can be observed. No "gut feelings", or "meta", or, "I dont like his attitude",that can be used instead of actual evidence.
Do I think it was useful to him? Maybe. Maybe not.
Maybe, Maybe not again eh? Maybe you should think about it and have an actual opinion.
Was there a reason other than to get a lynch through?
What kind of answer will help Scorpious read the player? Obviously as town that was the motivation and as scum you won't get another answer as it's a fine reason... seems like a pointless question eh?
Scum usually uses faulty logic. Not a dead give away, buts it's a good indicator.
Your second question, well it's alot easier to evaluate something in hindsight, rather than while you are actually in the moment. ask me this after more time has passed, unless you have something in particular you need me to comment on.
Again, and again, I disagree with your view on him being scum because of 1 question.
[psot]800[/post] Your thoughts right here are exactly why you should be voting Firebringer. However, DeasVail is not likely town. If you want to work together, you'll have to stop voting Scorpious as he's town.
I'm also aware that DeasVail is really good at scum and would have to try to offer something to prevent the game from ending with three straight chain lynches on scum. The fact is, DeasVail's skillful analysis is nowhere to be found and he's letting you do all the heavy lifting. His MO was like that day 1 as well.
Well I don't think I've had a town game since last year so I wouldn't be surprised if it's different. I'd like to know what exactly you mean though. My town game is really made out to be a lot better than it is.
Blah blah blah, your town game is pretty good and you making excuses for it sounds exactly like what you'll do when Scorpious flips town. Town usually don't say that they are worse than their reputation, which you are not.
I'm familiar enough with you to know that's not true. Do you have any reads you actually feel confident in? or are you just going to let Slandaar lead a mislynch on town for you?
In post 812, Scorpious wrote:So other than "ok" and "that makes sense". Garmr and Fire,can you please give some more reasoning behind your votes on me?
I feel like your policy lynch vote on me was scummy and that you knew enough about my play style that you were misrepresenting it by saying it was unusual.
So get lynched scum.
In post 816, Doctor Vahlen wrote:Anything that resembles your towngame. All I'm seeing is scum desperate to save Firebringer and Fluggernaut.
DoctorV, what confuses me is that I have very publicly voiced my opinion that I'm not as great as everyone thinks I am. This has included during the scummies ceremony, in the leadup to team mafia, in out-of-game chat. Pretty much everyone that knows me will know that I don't have a high opinion of my own town-game. So it surprises me that someone that so confidently comments on the strength of both my town and scum game (and claims to know that this is different from my town game) does not know of my low confidence when it comes to this stuff.
As deadline is a fair way away and Fitz is my strongest scumread. I'm not going to put any extra effort into lynching Scorpious. If he is lynched then I'll be happy with that, but my main priority right now is actually getting posts from Fitz to either confirm or weaken my scumread of him.
If you'd like my reads, I guess it can be represented somewhat like the following.
You were in the top group and might still be there, but I don't know what to think of your recent comments on me. It's remarkably inaccurate but at the same time there's this weird confidence and I don't know what to think of it.