In post 751, notscience wrote:Do tell, what did you hope to accomplish with the capslock rage?
And if my reasons are shit, you should have no issue refuting them? Yet you didn't seem to comment on them once, the entire game.
Are you magically hoping that I see your caps lock rage and know the fault in my ways?
In post 755, notscience wrote:You aren't trying to convince me, all you've said is that she lurks as scum and isn't lurking here and that's such a huge fucking copout
Guess whose meta used to only be if they lurk they're scum?
Guess who then topped the fucking postcount to break said meta?
The amount she posts isn't as important as what she posts. (that being said I do think hyperlurking and overposting are shitty, but)
In post 761, notscience wrote:Ika there was literally 0 fucking chance of anyone else getting lynched yesterday.
In post 763, notscience wrote:I don't think scum/mala's that stupid to not get the towncred when the lynch was inevitable.
Do you?
In post 748, ika wrote:In post 747, singersigner wrote:vote: ika
Those are really weak reasons to have for any of your reads.
I think Mala's reads are on point. Still unsure about BBT and Shadowez but think we have time to lynch the four of them and gg no re?
fine with me we are at POE.
VOTE: ika
we can move on
In post 766, zakk wrote:In post 748, ika wrote:In post 747, singersigner wrote:vote: ika
Those are really weak reasons to have for any of your reads.
I think Mala's reads are on point. Still unsure about BBT and Shadowez but think we have time to lynch the four of them and gg no re?
fine with me we are at POE.
VOTE: ika
we can move on
ive done dumber
If you're town you're dumb for this
In post 737, Scorpious wrote:@Shiro,Can you provide us reads based on this game and this game alone? Without using any meta?
What is your opinion of Zakk in THIS GAME?
In post 583, singersigner wrote:Would lynch or demand a replace out on that one.
In post 584, Scorpious wrote:I'd be fine with either. That's balls to be the second least frequent poster to call v/la until a day and a half before dl. What leads us to believe that there will be more posting then..
In post 317, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I have no idea about singer, but Sonic doing something like what you just described, Axle, I could see. I want to talk to Sonic properly and make a read on him based on that, though.
As for the rest of stuff about Zakk, I get where you're coming from, and why you're scumreading him. I think I'll be paying a lot of attention to zakk, but right now I think he's a positive influence on the game, even if other players perhaps don't see it that way. By the way, could you repeat what you want zakk to explain, things that he 'handwaved' earlier? I'd like to see him respond to you on that.
I think it should be pretty obvious that I want VeeGee lynched, though. If not him, then Malakittens.
In post 320, MaxwellPuckett wrote:So... like I understand what you're saying, but why would a scum zakk knowingly do anti-town behaviour? If he understood his behaviour being anti-town at the time, as you claim... why do it? Is it not more likely that at the time, he didn't realize his behaviour was anti-team play (I believe that's what you're saying), and only realized later?
Speaking from personal experience, one's feelings at the time of a post are usually a lot different then their feelings when reading it later.
So. is there a plausible explanation as to why a scum zakk who, knowing what anti-town play looks like, would choose to play in that way?
PEDIT: I've never played with either zakk or VeeGee.
But you're saying that VeeGee is normally like this, right? If that's the case, I'll read up on him and re-assess, but within the boundaries of this game only I don't see why lynching VeeGee is a bad idea. Since VeeGee is apparently always somewhat scummy.. what would you look for in determining his alignment? How would you avoid dismissing VeeGee as scum based on his meta of being scummy regardless of alignment?
And as for zakk's meta, I think I've explained about that before the PEDIT.
In post 327, MaxwellPuckett wrote:ika: How is zakk a VI? Also, if the game is like 15 pages in, read it. Or, you can jump on the only wagon and ignore what happened while you were away. Your meta isn't difficult, ika, and I'll be happy to vote you if you decide to take an inactive role in this game.
Axle: Alright, I guess I understand your theory. I don't really agree, but I get where you're coming from? Or at least I see how you've explained his behaviour from a scum perspective.
Malakittens: A breakdown of your reads would be cool.
Zakk: My slot has a lot to answer for? Please, ask away if you have problems. I honestly don't know what the heck you expect me to say about Nosferatu, though. Lurksack? Had too many games going? Low-hanging fruit lynch?
In post 330, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Oh, right, and singer, do we actually agree about Mala? I think zakk's play has been a lot better than theirs. If VeeGee is always like this, and I'll check them out tomorrow, I'd rather move my vote over to Mala.
