[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7174593 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 521: Desperation (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Alpha, I feel like I know you and am able to read you better if you tell me your main. Refusal to do so is a clear lack of transparency, which is favorable to scum.
More votes, please.
I'm actually new to this site. I played one game here under the name Maybrony (and oh god, that game was awful). I was VT that game.
Are you not familiar with the concept of an RVS vote?
yes but the person who starts the RVS tends to be scum
If we started the RVS, but you thought starting a random lynch was scummy, what does that say about you? Were we random voting, or were we pushing for an early lynch? Make up your mind.
Post
Post #153 (isolation #18) » Wed Aug 26, 2015 7:10 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
hardclaim daycop
Might as well come clean. I didn't want to do this but since you guys pressured me I don't have a choice any more. I'm a daycop, I'm supposed to send a day PM to the mod telling him who I'm investigating. The report was that Tiershift was Guilty, which is why I was so adamant about lynching him earlier until I realised you guys didn't believe me.
I could be a paranoid or insane cop though, it never said.
Because then you'll know my reads list was in good faith and not a scum's read list, and then attention will be called to TS, who will slip and die. It's the natural cycle of mafia; nothing against him as a person.
TS: The reason you are trying to halt my lynch is either because you fear my reads list being publicized or you think that it would look good for you to be the guy who advocated not to lynch a townie.
In post 190, TierShift wrote:Who's scum, varian, and why aren't you trying to get him/her lynched?
Is there a reason that, out of everything you possibly could have asked me, you asked something that should already be very clear by a) reading my ISO and b) noting the lack of recent activity by my scum suspects? Should I force myself to come up with questions to ask scum suspects who aren't here rather than letting questions occur to me naturally (such as now)? Would you rather I make a post every hour, "hey, just as a reminder, I still think temp and KT are scummy and you should all vote one of them"? Because I'm not going to flood the thread any more than it's already being flooded.
This looks like you're pressuring me for the sake of looking like you're putting pressure on someone (and because I said I'd answer questions if you had any) and not an actual genuine, organic question. My reads have been pretty clear with the exception of some of my town/null reads, which I prefer to keep close to my chest if they're not being pressured/wagoned.
I kind of think desperado voting is dumb, but eh,
despvote: KT
So you're saying that you don't want to reveal all your reads to town
in other words you're hiding something
what does town gain by you having your town/nulls close to your chest?
Post
Post #294 (isolation #37) » Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:09 am
Postby Flow Alpha »
UNVOTE: VOTE: KTCreeper
I cannot deal with this fucking child any longer, excuse my language but at some point we are going to need to policy lynch this poor excuse of a player.
Post
Post #311 (isolation #43) » Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:48 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
In post 223, LexTrew wrote:
Im town reading Edo and kmd, leaning scum on KT (but could easily be just newbie town).
This sounds like a hedge to me. You're leaning scum on KT, but leave a "could be newbie town" qualification as a way to weasel out of committment. I'm confused as to where you stand with him?
I dont get Flow at all, but I dont think he is scum actually, I dont see scum motivation behind his claims (well, it would get to a WIFOM thing).
Sounds like you're trying to cast doubt on me, while at the same time, not saying I'm scum.
I can only see this being useful to scum, because scum need to broaden the suspect pool while not taking any responsibility for a lynch gone wrong.
I agree with a LexTrew shot or lynch at this point.
Post
Post #317 (isolation #44) » Mon Aug 31, 2015 6:10 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
In post 315, Kmd4390 wrote:Alpha, why'd you say Lex was a terrible choice in post 309, but then in 311 you not only support it but sound like you didn't know it happened already?
Cat's out of the bag. We're quite obviously a hydra, if you couldn't already tell by the radically different posting styles and some jumpy opinions here and there such as in 309 and 311 (due to each of us having different ideas).
I won't reveal the other members of the hydra unless I get their consent.
Post
Post #353 (isolation #49) » Wed Sep 02, 2015 2:40 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
If KT doesn't respond to his prod in about 4 hours, he'll be replaced, probably because he forgot about the game or ragequit. I doubt he'd make it to LYLO at this rate.
Post
Post #354 (isolation #50) » Wed Sep 02, 2015 4:25 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
Let's lynch mm4 the "lets jump on free mislynches and hope noone notices" man, and let kt get booted for inactivity. We can talk to his replacement for some real content later.
Post
Post #400 (isolation #54) » Tue Sep 08, 2015 6:18 pm
Postby Flow Alpha »
In post 392, Kmd4390 wrote:
In Edos' ISO, I notice:
-he advocated against the Alpha wagon on Page 2, but jumped on two posts later. Probably RVS shenanigans
-called mario the closest thing he had to a scum read. Explained it fine when I questioned him on it
-seemed to believe KT was scum, or at least scummier than Mario, when voting him for opportunism
-asked Tier "why would new town" make the vote that KT made. This doesn't sound like KT's scumbuddy
-continues a strong push against KT
-I actually find it interesting that when Alpha fakeclaimed desperado, Edos wanted Temp shot rather than KT
-the all cap LOL when Alpha retracted the claim doesn't sound like the frustration town should have there. Then again, he doesn't seem to buy the retraction so........
-I understand his logic for wanting temp shot once he explains it.
-seems to drop KT as a suspect for no apparent reason after Tier's shot. I see this in his Temp vote, questioning of my KT scum read, and saying he'd vote Temp or Mario at deadline.
I think the "LOL" is more of a sigh of exasperation, when it was followed by a "Jesus Christ."
@Edosurist, why the change of heart towards MM4 after a strong push on KT for the majority of Day 1?