In post 62, Wanderer-nl wrote:I have voted. I unvoted later because I no longer think Performer's vote looks suspicious.
Why not?
In post 62, Wanderer-nl wrote:I have voted. I unvoted later because I no longer think Performer's vote looks suspicious.
In post 66, Akarin wrote:As I don't have any other games on site, none of them stand out in my memory.
The strangest game I played had a Jester whose existence was announced at the beginning of the game, the game ended in a loss for everyone else if they were lynched. That really messed up how the game worked.
I probably play better as town, and it's more fun!
Ihavedated someone I played a forum mafia game with, it was okay!
Fun fact: I milked a cow today (at a county fair.)
In post 67, Akarin wrote:Back on topic,
I think Wolfie and Expedience (Expy?) are being silly in thinking of this as some daring gambit. It's a simple joke that plenty of people as either alignment do all the time. "Practically confirmed town" is ridiculous.
It's weird that the gambit language has been repeated so much. And Wolfie looks like she has a lot more experience, it's weird that she'd buy into this kind of logic if she were actually trying to figure out if Slandaar were town or scum.
VOTE: SilverWolf
In post 69, Davsto wrote:In post 67, Akarin wrote:Back on topic,
I think Wolfie and Expedience (Expy?) are being silly in thinking of this as some daring gambit. It's a simple joke that plenty of people as either alignment do all the time. "Practically confirmed town" is ridiculous.
It's weird that the gambit language has been repeated so much. And Wolfie looks like she has a lot more experience, it's weird that she'd buy into this kind of logic if she were actually trying to figure out if Slandaar were town or scum.
VOTE: SilverWolf
Definitely agreeing here.
Slandaar's comment and the other person's follow up was blatantly a joke, and why people are actually voting on the two based on that is beyond me. It's like super-reaching, trying to find evidence when there's nothing.
VOTE: SilverWolf
In post 74, Davsto wrote:Uh, sorry, I appear to have misplaced my vote, it wasn't silverwolf who voted someone (seemingly seriously) based on the stuff.
UNVOTE:
It was Performer.
VOTE: performer
However, SilverWolf, townreading them by that exchange is also silly. I just find reaching to vote on a single person more scummy than oddly townreading two people from it.
Excuse me while I facepalm for being silly enough to mix that up.
In post 79, Davsto wrote:Yeh, sorry, I saw Akarin's comment and vote on you and assumed you were one of the ones voting Slandaar, without checking.
In post 89, Accountant wrote:I don't think that what Slandaar did was alignment indicative at all, and I'm treating it as a null tell on him. I think that SilverWolf's townreading me and Slandaar seems far-fetched, and an experienced player like him should know better. I'm not sure what to think about this, but it's possible buddying.
I think Akarin's analysis pretty much hit the nail on the head as well. I'm currently looking at the votecount and it's three votes for me three for Performer, so I think it makes sense to go ahead and
VOTE: Performer
Performer, if you could justify your vote that would be great.
In post 157, Davsto wrote:No.
I mixed it up because I agreed with the points, but didn't realise that Akarin had placed her vote on someone that hadn't actually done that.
In post 101, Expedience wrote:In post 100, Accountant wrote:That was a mistype. It should be "where town claimed town", which means that since scum would know you played in games where town claimed town, they would be incentivized to claim town to seem town themselves.
I'd say this is averyweak argument, since SilverWolf didn't say that she believed this to be a Town tell before Slandaar made his comment. It would require scum to both read the games that she mentioned, and also require SilverWolf noticing and mentioning it. If SilverWolf and Slandaar were both scum, I really don't think they'd be this blatant.
Nevertheless, I don't think Town are any more likely to claim Town during RVS / RQS than scum.
Where does she say she isn't a good player?In post 148, MarioManiac4 wrote:If she pushes some mislynches she can point to that and say "look, I'm not a good player. I'm not scum for pushing these mislynches."
I really don't want to have to go find them. I just remember seeing town players do RQS, especially newer players.Can you link these?
In post 51, Performer wrote:In post 47, SilverWolf wrote:Slandaar and Accountant are both prob not scum. I really don't see scum pulling either of those gambits-claiming town like that or claiming scum like that.
Performer. What exactly were you hoping to learn from those particular RQS questions and how would that help you determine anyone's alignment this game?
Meh, the questions were a way to gauge responses. Or at least learn a little about people here. I'm very new to this website, you never now what you learn about others. Most people seem to be strictly focused on playing the game and treating it super serious, but I'm more into the "fun part."
As for someone claiming to be mafia or town...I played games on another site, where a few people did that early in day 1 and wow, it turned out quite bad for us townies, because they turned out to be something other than the claim.
Much thanks to Accountant for answering, didn't realize you're not an actual accountant
In post 26, Accountant wrote:In post 24, Slandaar wrote:I don't feel like voting any of you at the moment, instead, I shall just let you all know that I am town. I obviously wouldn't lie to you good people so this effectively makes me confirmed town! If only every townie was as clever as me and had thought of this great way to confirm themselves the game would be so easy!
VOTE: Slandaar
Clearly a joke vote.In post 28, Accountant wrote:I know you're town. I'm actually mafia trying to push a quickhammer on a townie before people realize how confirmed he is.
A bit meh on this one, but doesn't seem to be making the vote based on the joke vote.In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
In post 36, Performer wrote:In post 27, Slandaar wrote:I think you missed the part where I confirmed myself as town using logics.
VOTE: Slandaar
On the other hand, Performer seemed to take the obvious joke seriously and actually voted based on it, by the looks of it.In post 51, Performer wrote:As for someone claiming to be mafia or town...I played games on another site, where a few people did that early in day 1 and wow, it turned out quite bad for us townies, because they turned out to be something other than the claim.
In post 161, absta101 wrote:@MarioWhere does she say she isn't a good player?In post 148, MarioManiac4 wrote:If she pushes some mislynches she can point to that and say "look, I'm not a good player. I'm not scum for pushing these mislynches."
I really don't want to have to go find them. I just remember seeing town players do RQS, especially newer players.Can you link these?
Also, I want to make it clear that the meta point I mentioned isn't the main reason for my null-read of his RQS. It's mainly because I don't see any compelling scum or town motivations for what he did.
In post 157, Davsto wrote:No.
I mixed it up because I agreed with the points, but didn't realise that Akarin had placed her vote on someone that hadn't actually done that.
In post 164, Davsto wrote:Let's take a look at the three votes on Slandaar, shall we?
In post 26, Accountant wrote:In post 24, Slandaar wrote:I don't feel like voting any of you at the moment, instead, I shall just let you all know that I am town. I obviously wouldn't lie to you good people so this effectively makes me confirmed town! If only every townie was as clever as me and had thought of this great way to confirm themselves the game would be so easy!
VOTE: Slandaar
Clearly a joke vote.In post 28, Accountant wrote:I know you're town. I'm actually mafia trying to push a quickhammer on a townie before people realize how confirmed he is.
A bit meh on this one, but doesn't seem to be making the vote based on the joke vote.In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
In post 36, Performer wrote:In post 27, Slandaar wrote:I think you missed the part where I confirmed myself as town using logics.
VOTE: Slandaar
On the other hand, Performer seemed to take the obvious joke seriously and actually voted based on it, by the looks of it.In post 51, Performer wrote:As for someone claiming to be mafia or town...I played games on another site, where a few people did that early in day 1 and wow, it turned out quite bad for us townies, because they turned out to be something other than the claim.
That is why I voted Performer over the others.
In post 165, MarioManiac4 wrote:If I'm not missing something about Ara claiming Performer thought slandaar was town then most of the wagon is built on sand.
The fact that Accountant and Performer were counterwagons also give me a townread on that slot.
In post 168, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 165, MarioManiac4 wrote:If I'm not missing something about Ara claiming Performer thought slandaar was town then most of the wagon is built on sand.
The fact that Accountant and Performer were counterwagons also give me a townread on that slot.
Can you please make this a little more clear because I have no idea what wagon you mean and whom you're townreading.
In post 169, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 168, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 165, MarioManiac4 wrote:If I'm not missing something about Ara claiming Performer thought slandaar was town then most of the wagon is built on sand.
The fact that Accountant and Performer were counterwagons also give me a townread on that slot.
Can you please make this a little more clear because I have no idea what wagon you mean and whom you're townreading.
So I thought Performer was being voted for townreading Slandaar for a moment, when that didn't happen.
I was townreading Performer.
That's not what i'm getting at. You said in point 2 that she is trying to make excuses for wrong reads with her ToS (town or scum, i'm guessing). You then explained in post 148 that she could push a mislynch and then later state that she isn't a good player like she already 'told us'.In post 166, MarioManiac4 wrote:I never said she DID, I said she COULD.
In post 167, MarioManiac4 wrote:
Why does Performer trying to find something scummy and get out of it seem scummy to you?
I think we're past RVS now, so why is your vote still sitting on him?Performer wrote:Davsto 's post 159 – you think it's pathetic but it was RVS, it’s early on day 1, so me putting a bit of pressure wouldn’t do harm if he really is town, or if he really is joking.
In post 173, Davsto wrote:In post 167, MarioManiac4 wrote:
Why does Performer trying to find something scummy and get out of it seem scummy to you?
Performer was trying to find something scummy out of a joke, by reaching in an unreasonable manner. I find that behaviour scummy.
I think we're past RVS now, so why is your vote still sitting on him?Performer wrote:Davsto 's post 159 – you think it's pathetic but it was RVS, it’s early on day 1, so me putting a bit of pressure wouldn’t do harm if he really is town, or if he really is joking.