Mini 1720 Number Mafia | Endgame snuggles

MTD · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:03 pm

In post 72, Espeonage wrote:
In post 70, MTD wrote:
In post 64, Espeonage wrote:@MTD: I refuse to die until I have flirted with everyone. So buck up best boy. Mollie started it.

meh that sucks.

tbf, I would have been wagoned for once people consider the banter that happened yesterday before roles went out.

my problem is that I don't know if you are scum but I just said I will keep my vote on you so it kinda keeps me from voting better.

Plotinus · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:05 pm

Official Vote Count 1.03 more about ulam spirals

Here’s a video about Ulam Spirals! It shows you how to make your own! I made a crochet one once.

It also talks some about Ulam who made the first Ulam Spiral in 1963.

It talks some about Sack’s Spirals too which are also really impressive and exciting!

DeathRowKitty

(L-4): lalaladucks, BlueBloodedToffee, All Alone

pirate mollie

(L-6): Antihero

BlueBloodedToffee

(L-6): Espeonage

Espeonage

(L-6): MTD

Antihero

(L-6): DeathRowKitty

SithLord84 (L-7): MTD

Not Voting

(6): Bellaphant, DeasVail,

DeathRowKitty

, JarJarDrinks, pirate mollie, SithLord84, Wanderer-nl

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline: 279th (3²*31) day of the year or in (expired on 2015-10-06 14:00:00).

Let me know if there are any problems with the VC, or if you have maths related flavour requests.

Mod notes: <3

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:08 pm

In post 73, MTD wrote:yes I do, I think it's heavily overanalysing a lazy start-of-game post.

I realise that you haven't played with me before - so I'm just going to let this slide.

In post 74, DeathRowKitty wrote:
This is very silly, but I think you already know that. Let's both vote antihero instead

Vote: Antihero

I don't know that - can you explain why it's silly?

I have no interest in voting Anti.

lalaladucks · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:08 pm

raise your hand if you're a numberphile

feel the city breakin' and everybody shakin'
and we're stayin' alive, stayin' alive

v

o

t

e

:

b

u

b

l

e

t

e

a

ah, ha, ha, ha

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:09 pm

There it is...the delayed vote.

How scummy.

lalaladucks · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:10 pm

ooh

bubbletea can i ask you a question?

have you looked at any of the people's metas in this game? just curious because of your sig ya know

pedit: yay! scummy rhymes with dummy : D

Espeonage · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:11 pm

In post 79, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There it is...the delayed vote.

How scummy.

Lets not forget you arguing her in to a position of damned if you do, damned if you don't. Then not leaving any room for benefit if the doubt. bc that is a scum minded trap.

lalaladucks · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:13 pm

espe you needn't wk me

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:14 pm

In post 77, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 74, DeathRowKitty wrote:
This is very silly, but I think you already know that. Let's both vote antihero instead

Vote: Antihero

I don't know that - can you explain why it's silly?

Yeah. If I do nothing this game are people going to look at my RVS posts and think "damn, guess DRK just has no idea how to play this game. I should just let it slide"? I hope not.

I was actually lying though in my first post and I'd already read the posts up to that point.

Tiny text is of the devil. Keep it 70+ please. --P

Espeonage · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:14 pm

I'm just trying to make bbt mad. I maintain that it will make him easier to read.

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:15 pm

tbh lala might be scum here

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:15 pm

In post 80, lalaladucks wrote:
have you looked at any of the people's metas in this game? just curious because of your sig ya know

LOL. No.

In post 81, Espeonage wrote:
Lets not forget you arguing her in to a position of damned if you do, damned if you don't. Then not leaving any room for benefit if the doubt. bc that is a scum minded trap.

This is getting interesting now.

What you're doing here is misrepping me. Had Ducks voted me when she expressed her disliking of my posts, I would have had no problem with the vote. I quite clearly asked her to make her mind up.

However, she didn't. What she DID do is wait to see what the reaction was to her pushing me, and

then

she voted. This is scummy.

Your misrepping is scummier though. Here, have a vote;

VOTE: Esp

lalaladucks · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:16 pm

In post 85, DeathRowKitty wrote:tbh lala might be scum here

aw >:

Espeonage · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:21 pm

In post 86, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 80, lalaladucks wrote:
have you looked at any of the people's metas in this game? just curious because of your sig ya know

LOL. No.

In post 81, Espeonage wrote:
Lets not forget you arguing her in to a position of damned if you do, damned if you don't. Then not leaving any room for benefit if the doubt. bc that is a scum minded trap.

This is getting interesting now.

What you're doing here is misrepping me. Had Ducks voted me when she expressed her disliking of my posts, I would have had no problem with the vote. I quite clearly asked her to make her mind up.

However, she didn't. What she DID do is wait to see what the reaction was to her pushing me, and
then
she voted. This is scummy.

Your misrepping is scummier though. Here, have a vote;

VOTE: Esp

See the issue is that you and I both know you would have pushed on her if she hadn't voted you either. Because then it would have been her avoiding the situationally scummy action of voting you at this time. So yeah, gonna argue to the hills here that this isn't a misrep and you're just being a scumbutt.

MTD · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:23 pm

dammit, now I have to

UNVOTE: before that becomse a wagon.

I don't see espe as scum rn.

The entrance vote from All Alone seemed awkward, before that gets forgotten (since they voted drk, who at that point had 2 votes already, with noone giving an explanation for them yet and without any comment from them).

In post 77, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 73, MTD wrote:yes I do, I think it's heavily overanalysing a lazy start-of-game post.

I realise that you haven't played with me before - so I'm just going to let this slide.

please don't "let it slide", I want to know exaaactly what you think about my comment.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:27 pm

You're right, I would have. As soon as she didn't vote me when she was expressing suspicion of my slot it started to ping me.

Posturing behind a read/vote like that is scummy - no matter how you look at it.

You're quite clearly misrepping me though as I feel like I gave Ducks plenty of time to put her money where her mouth is and she didn't do it.

PEdit - You think I'm 'heavily overanalysing' but this is how I play. You wouldn't understand that because we've never played together before.

MTD · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:28 pm

In post 90, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You think I'm 'heavily overanalysing' but this is how I play. You wouldn't understand that because we've never played together before.

So you're saying you always heavily overanalyse everything.

Espeonage · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:31 pm

Ok, then why did you make out like the end result was scummy in and of itself if she had already secured the scumread from you?

MTD · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:32 pm

better even you say that it matters "how you always play" and at the same time heavily attack using meta -.-

MTD · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:32 pm

but "I'll let that slide" for now.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:37 pm

In post 91, MTD wrote:
So you're saying you always heavily overanalyse everything.

At the start of a game, yes.

In post 92, Espeonage wrote:Ok, then why did you make out like the end result was scummy in and of itself if she had already secured the scumread from you?

Because it was? I mean, you're acting as if I had no problem with Ducks before she voted me and we both know that's not the case. I'm naturally defensive, so once somebody votes me I just go full speed ahead and start attacking back.

lalaladucks · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:38 pm

In post 89, MTD wrote:dammit, now I have to

UNVOTE: before that becomse a wagon.

wat

espe had two votes? don't think he was really in danger of being lynched

The entrance vote from All Alone seemed awkward, before that gets forgotten (since they voted drk, who at that point had 2 votes already, with noone giving an explanation for them yet and without any comment from them).

yeah they're pretty quiet
didn't reply to my 'hello' either

BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're right, I would have. As soon as she didn't vote me when she was expressing suspicion of my slot it started to ping me.

Posturing behind a read/vote like that is scummy - no matter how you look at it.

You're quite clearly misrepping me though as I feel like I gave Ducks plenty of time to put her money where her mouth is and she didn't do it.

PEdit - You think I'm 'heavily overanalysing' but this is how I play. You wouldn't understand that because we've never played together before.

gooosh

i wanted to see drk come back to determine whether to move my vote

are you going to label this as

very suspicious

now?

All Alone · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:05 am

In post 90, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're right, I would have. As soon as she didn't vote me when she was expressing suspicion of my slot it started to ping me.

Posturing behind a read/vote like that is scummy - no matter how you look at it.

She voted you, you've never voted her, and she's the posturer in this fight? I don't think so.

VOTE: BlueBloodedToffee

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:16 am

Ahw I missed RVS?

I'm not really scumreading BBT over his thing with lala. I kinda agree she could have voted earlier, but I also don't agree with a scumread on her, she feels like she's trying to figure things out and wasn't afraid to get us out of RVS. I like that.

MTD: why were you afraid of a wagon forming on Espeonage?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:25 am

Mostly caught up, gonna do a reread. But first:

In post 29, Espeonage wrote:
Claim: VT

Will flirt for reads.

Is that a real vanilla claim? If so, why isn't anyone talking about it? Isn't claiming for no reason terrible?

Or is it not a real claim and I'm missing something?