Micro 531: Everything Is A Lie Mafia (Game Over)

Davsto · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:52 am

In post 98, wgeurts wrote:
In post 91, Davsto wrote:
@mod - when players die, how much information do they flip with?

Probably their entire role PM.

does this include any lies within said mod PM being clarified?

Davsto · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:54 am

In post 86, shos wrote:Sooooo guyz who should I daycop

In actual actual seriousness, I'd recommend inspecting whomever ends up being the decided lynch today, before the hammer. This should help you if you're Insane Cop, but not help Naive/Paranoid/Random Cop or Millers. However, it helps as much as possible.

shos · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:54 am

In post 96, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 95, shos wrote:
In post 88, Davsto wrote:
In post 86, shos wrote:Sooooo guyz who should I daycop

Yourself to check the accuracy.

I'm sane.

But how do you know?
Do you have information we don't?
Am I actually your scumbuddy in disguise?
Are you actually Town with a scum Role PM?
Does your daycop work as a dayvig?

Welp, this one sounds fake as hell

daycopping in progress

Davsto · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:56 am

Well that's my advice scuppered.

shos · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:56 am

Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

ISO · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:56 am

In post 100, Davsto wrote:
In post 98, wgeurts wrote:
In post 91, Davsto wrote:
@mod - when players die, how much information do they flip with?

Probably their entire role PM.

does this include any lies within said mod PM being clarified?

Who knows?

Peptobislawl · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:57 am

In post 100, Davsto wrote:
In post 98, wgeurts wrote:
In post 91, Davsto wrote:
@mod - when players die, how much information do they flip with?

Probably their entire role PM.

does this include any lies within said mod PM being clarified?

It probably does.

In regards to my theoretical post restriction, since I have reserved no warnings or indeed mod communications of any kind about it I am enclyned to agree with you.

Davsto · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 7:59 am

For the record, I'm okay with a Mario lynch for entirely non-inspection related reasons. The fact that this will give us some info is entirely irrelevant to me.

Peptobislawl · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:00 am

In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

VOTE: Mario

This will not serve as a sanity check of sorts. Plus, we don't need presure.

Davsto · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:02 am

That's Mario at L-1, which could easily be a lynch with The Counsel.

Waywaywaywaywayyyyy too early for a lynch, seriously.

UNVOTE:

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:02 am

In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

Seeing as I'm a fucking mason you need to go take a dip in humble pie
#justsaying

Davsto · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:03 am

In post 110, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

Seeing as I'm a fucking mason you need to go take a dip in humble pie
#justsaying

I thought you were in a neighbourhood..?

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:03 am

In post 108, Peptobislawl wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

VOTE: Mario

This will not serve as a sanity check of sorts. Plus, we don't need presure.

Did you even read my post about your post restriction or are you faking it?

Pedit: Calling a masonry a neighbourhood sounded like a good idea?

shos · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:05 am

Mason eh? I dun buy it
Bastard game and your lartber has yet to claim

Davsto · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:06 am

In post 112, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 108, Peptobislawl wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

VOTE: Mario

This will not serve as a sanity check of sorts. Plus, we don't need presure.

Did you even read my post about your post restriction or are you faking it?

As I said, the way that the previous slotholder happened to be replaced out just after breaking said restriction I think it's too much to risk.

Also, it's hardly an obstructive post restriction. All you have to do is eliminate negatives from their posts. Easy.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:07 am

In post 113, shos wrote:Mason eh? I dun buy it
Bastard game and your lartber has yet to claim

So you're trying to out the masons, for reason ?
GOT IT
VOTE: shos

Peptobislawl · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:08 am

In post 112, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 108, Peptobislawl wrote:
In post 104, shos wrote:Welp, this was easy

Mario is guilty

VOTE: Mario

VOTE: Mario

This will not serve as a sanity check of sorts. Plus, we don't need presure.

Did you even read my post about your post restriction or are you faking it?

Pedit: Calling a masonry a neighbourhood sounded like a good idea?

Don't read my post 106.

I doubt he means Miller, and getting the role name right is encouraging.

Davsto · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:10 am

Seriously guys can we have a tad more discussion or stuff before quicklynching? Thanks.

shos · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:12 am

Lolz and lolz

Lynch mrio

Davsto · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:13 am

Seriously dude, we have half of the playerlist in a post number which is single digits.

Peptobislawl · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:15 am

I knew Full well that Mario was at L-1 after my vote because I am super attentive.

shos · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:15 am

In post 120, Peptobislawl wrote:I knew Full well that Mario was at L-1 after my vote because I am super attentive.

I haz requezt hmmmr

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:18 am

In post 121, shos wrote:
In post 120, Peptobislawl wrote:I knew Full well that Mario was at L-1 after my vote because I am super attentive.

I haz requezt hmmmr

I lold so hard
Can we wagon this

Davsto · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:19 am

No we can't, MarioManiac.

VOTE: MarioManiac4

Mario's last few posts have sorta cemented an actual reads-based scumread.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:24 am

In post 123, Davsto wrote:No we can't, MarioManiac.

VOTE: MarioManiac4

Mario's last few posts have sorta cemented an actual reads-based scumread.

So you're saying to not quicklynch and BAM you're okay with it
lmao;