Mini 1717 Alfred Hitchcock UPick [GAME OVER]

Thor665 · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:16 am

In post 23, Concrete Angels wrote:
In post 22, Thor665 wrote:
Vote: Davsto

Also, slight town read and slight silly read on Cataphant.

slight town read on cataphant?

Yes, I have a slight town read on him.

Why, do you have a scumread on him and are annoyed that someone is getting the opposite read?
I don't get your issue, and you're not really asking a question here, so...?

Concrete Angels · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:21 am

In post 25, Thor665 wrote:
In post 23, Concrete Angels wrote:
In post 22, Thor665 wrote:
Vote: Davsto

Also, slight town read and slight silly read on Cataphant.

slight town read on cataphant?

Yes, I have a slight town read on him.

Why, do you have a scumread on him and are annoyed that someone is getting the opposite read?
I don't get your issue, and you're not really asking a question here, so...?

Your wording wasn't very clear. I wasn't sure if you missed a word or if you were saying two things about one person.

I was actually more curious about the speed of the read itself. Do you normally post reads like that right away at the beginning of a game?

Furthermore... I sense a strange aggression in this post. Why?

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:40 am

I have a wild guess as to why, but i'll let him answer, I do have a slight townlean on Thor however i'll sheep

Vote: Davsto

~Sakura

Davsto · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:44 am

Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

Antihero · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:58 am

everyone plz take a moment to familiarize yourselves with Post 1 and Post 2. they have some important stuff.

the post tags don't work for post 0? lame.

Thor665 · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:00 am

In post 26, Concrete Angels wrote:Your wording wasn't very clear. I wasn't sure if you missed a word or if you were saying two things about one person.

I was saying two things about one person - I also am unsure how saying "I have a slight town read on - X" is unclear. I'll be doing a lot of reads in that basic format in the future; as a warning.

In post 26, Concrete Angels wrote:I was actually more curious about the speed of the read itself. Do you normally post reads like that right away at the beginning of a game?

Sure, it's pretty normal for me.

In post 26, Concrete Angels wrote:Furthermore... I sense a strange aggression in this post. Why?

Because I was attacking you for questioning a townread - I find that to be potentially scummy and was trying to get a read off of you as regards that immediate reaction.

Why - do you have an issue with aggression? Does it upset you or make you feel uneasy?

In post 28, Davsto wrote:Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

I would be more curious if the number of votes on you was 3 or 5 - 4 people and 4 votes seems pretty normal.
Why is it curious? I'm curious

Thor665 · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:02 am

In post 29, Antihero wrote:
everyone plz take a moment to familiarize yourselves with , Post 1, and Post 2. they have some important stuff.

Sure - if you tell me who was missing any of that stuff

Davsto · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:23 am

In post 30, Thor665 wrote:
In post 28, Davsto wrote:Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

I would be more curious if the number of votes on you was 3 or 5 - 4 people and 4 votes seems pretty normal.
Why is it curious? I'm curious

I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

Davsto · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:25 am

Especially interesting is that two of said votes are re-votes, and one of them is sheeping. Is sheeping an RVS vote a thing?

Concrete Angels · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:31 am

@Thor: I found the aggression odd considering my post was pretty obviously a clarification and not a questioning of the read itself. It seemed over the top. I wanted to know if there was a personal reason for it or something else.

Concrete Angels · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:35 am

My confusion came from the fact the components were separated and I wanted to be sure about what you were saying.

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:44 am

In post 32, Davsto wrote:I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

Really? I'd expect the opposite, RVS wagons are great.

~Sakura

Thor665 · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:46 am

In post 32, Davsto wrote:I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

I would too, but only if we're bad players.

In post 33, Davsto wrote:Especially interesting is that two of said votes are re-votes, and one of them is sheeping. Is sheeping an RVS vote a thing?

It must be a thing because it just happened.

So you find the re-votes and the sheep vote on you potentially scummy, and me the towniest vote on you?

In post 34, Concrete Angels wrote:@Thor: I found the aggression odd considering my post was pretty obviously a clarification and not a questioning of the read itself.

I disagree with your value call on what your comment looked like.
And what is "odd" in having aggression? Lots of Mafia players have high levels of real or faked aggression - I would thinkt hat would be very normal to see and, indeed, expected - no?

In post 34, Concrete Angels wrote:It seemed over the top. I wanted to know if there was a personal reason for it or something else.

Nope, thread related.
It's a hydra of Bella and hiplop that didn't even claim which head had posted (though my guess would be hiplop) - I am not claiming deep meta insight into either of them and it would be weird of me to be able to extract a meta tell from that.
For the record I will never claim deep meta insight into anyone.

Davsto · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:49 am

Meh. Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

Thor665 · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:50 am

But you still find Cataphant scummier than her?

Davsto · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:54 am

Don't feel entirely like removing my RVS vote yet. Don't find Cata scummy, but there's only one post.

*shrug*

Sakura Hana · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:54 am

In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:55 am

In post 41, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

Derp

Davsto · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:55 am

In post 41, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:57 am

In post 43, Davsto wrote:
In post 41, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura
I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:57 am

In post 44, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 43, Davsto wrote:
In post 41, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura
I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

I probably should unbookmark this from my main

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:58 am

Sorry anti haven't played in hydra in a while

~Sakura

Davsto · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:59 am

In post 44, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 43, Davsto wrote:
In post 41, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 38, Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura
I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

Because then everyone seems to think I have a solid read of some sort, idk.

So why did you sheep Thor whilst changing your vote?

Thor665 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 5:00 am

Eh, I'm fine with this speed wagon as currently exists.

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Fri Sep 25, 2015 5:01 am

In post 47, Davsto wrote:So why did you sheep Thor whilst changing your vote?

Already mentioned:

In post 27, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:I do have a slight townlean on Thor

In post 36, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:RVS wagons are great.

~Sakura