Mini 1723: Town of Helen Day 4

[Prolapsed Brain]

Wow, drama. Let me know when it's over.

[Titus]

But Silver just refereed to you as scum rather than any specific type of scum. Why would that be a consideration?

And why can't it be 10-2-1?

Scum means group scum. I have taught her the difference.

10 v 2 v 1 is unbalanced for the 2.

[SilverWolf]

I'm done unless Titus lies about me again. Then expect more.

[Vedith]

Yeah I don't like the assumption from Titus, I think that she knows more than she's letting on.

UNVOTE: GL
VOTE: Titus

[Vedith]

But Silver just refereed to you as scum rather than any specific type of scum. Why would that be a consideration?

And why can't it be 10-2-1?

Scum means group scum. I have taught her the difference.

10 v 2 v 1 is unbalanced for the 2.

Well I see scum as not town - Explain it to me.

[Titus]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

[SilverWolf]

But Silver just refereed to you as scum rather than any specific type of scum. Why would that be a consideration?

And why can't it be 10-2-1?

Scum means group scum. I have taught her the difference.

10 v 2 v 1 is unbalanced for the 2.

Scum is scum to me. I don't give a fuck if they are groupscum or SK or whatever. It's scum.

Your hyper defensiveness of whether or not a SK is relevant here or how groupscum would react to one if there was one, strongly reminds me of 185. That plus your attempted tunnel on me. This is not town Titus at all.

pedit: Fuck off, I never said I wasn't posting again. I said there would be no drama if you stopped lying about me but expect more if you continue. Like you just did you liar.

[Titus]

But Silver just refereed to you as scum rather than any specific type of scum. Why would that be a consideration?

And why can't it be 10-2-1?

Scum means group scum. I have taught her the difference.

10 v 2 v 1 is unbalanced for the 2.

Well I see scum as not town - Explain it to me.

There's town scum and SK. Sk isn't aligned with scum, doesn't share their wincon. If you want a catch all, it's anti-town?

[Vedith]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

You are talking as if you know the setup...
How can you surely know at this stage what there is, what's balanced and not without more information.
You obviously know that there is something else and I think the SK is a scum slip from you.

[Titus]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

*not her buddy

[Titus]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

You are talking as if you know the setup...
How can you surely know at this stage what there is, what's balanced and not without more information.
You obviously know that there is something else and I think the SK is a scum slip from you.

I setup crack. It's what I do. I do know there's no SK. :p it wouldn't be balanced.

Deal with it.

[Vedith]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

You are talking as if you know the setup...
How can you surely know at this stage what there is, what's balanced and not without more information.
You obviously know that there is something else and I think the SK is a scum slip from you.

I setup crack. It's what I do. I do know there's no SK. :p it wouldn't be balanced.

Deal with it.

So you are with 2 other scum then?

[Titus]

If you can balance a 10 v 2 v 1 for all parties, I will revisit, but it cannot be done.

[Titus]

So you're never posting again, SW. I never lied about you at all. At least that's one scum out.

Now, Vedith, let's see if you're scum or her buddy. How would 2 v 1 v 10 be balanced for the two?

You are talking as if you know the setup...
How can you surely know at this stage what there is, what's balanced and not without more information.
You obviously know that there is something else and I think the SK is a scum slip from you.

I setup crack. It's what I do. I do know there's no SK. :p it wouldn't be balanced.

Deal with it.

So you are with 2 other scum then?

So I am SK and group scum? That's impossible. :p

[SilverWolf]

This is a bastard game so Titus doesn't know shit about anything. Ignore her. She's scum.

[Titus]

This is a bastard game so Titus doesn't know shit about anything. Ignore her. She's scum.

You're argument is that I know too much and now ignore me because I know nothing.

AT LEAST BE CONSISTENT. I taught you better.

[SilverWolf]

This is a bastard game so Titus doesn't know shit about anything. Ignore her. She's scum.

You're argument is that I know too much and now ignore me because I know nothing.

AT LEAST BE CONSISTENT. I taught you better.

NO, YOU KEEP LYING AND I'M FUCKING SICK OF IT.

I said your obsession with the SK role reminds me of 185 and that you trying to discredit the possibility of it is scummy as fuck. This is a bastard game and you fail to mention that in your analysis.

Anyway, it's dinner time.

[Vedith]

So I am SK and group scum? That's impossible. :p

No one actually called you SK - You just mentioned about it and then started saying that there can't be one.

[Titus]

Yeah, I own it. There is no SK. Trying to make sure we're set right isn't scummy at all. I am not being subtle.

If you want to challenge it, fight the setup assertion. Prove an SK can be balanced. Otherwise, all your fear mongeing is irrelevant.

[Titus]

So I am SK and group scum? That's impossible. :p

No one actually called you SK - You just mentioned about it and then started saying that there can't be one.

SW said I was likely scum because I rolled SK before. Technically I said SK first but her post was misleading six ways from Sunday if I didn't. She said I was scum in NY 185, which is at best misleading because I was SK not scum.

She started the game off with fear mongering and SK hunting, which are scummy.

It's like asking "what is 2 plus 2" and then saying a person is scummy for mentioning 4.

[Vedith]

Titus, have you not been reading the comments?
I can't prove for or against, I don't know the setup but you obviously do.

You are getting flustered as you are being poked as scum I think.

[Vedith]

So I am SK and group scum? That's impossible. :p

No one actually called you SK - You just mentioned about it and then started saying that there can't be one.

SW said I was likely scum because I rolled SK before. Technically I said SK first but her post was misleading six ways from Sunday if I didn't. She said I was scum in NY 185, which is at best misleading because I was SK not scum.

She started the game off with fear mongering and SK hunting, which are scummy.

It's like asking "what is 2 plus 2" and then saying a person is scummy for mentioning 4.

SK is scum though.
I didn't read it as fear though.

[Titus]

I have been reading. I don't get flustered as scum. You are at best confbiasing here. You're sidestepping the issue that SK doesn't balance. Period.

Seems like you're ignoring what I am saying.

I will humor you though, what am I missing?

[Titus]

So I am SK and group scum? That's impossible. :p

No one actually called you SK - You just mentioned about it and then started saying that there can't be one.

SW said I was likely scum because I rolled SK before. Technically I said SK first but her post was misleading six ways from Sunday if I didn't. She said I was scum in NY 185, which is at best misleading because I was SK not scum.

She started the game off with fear mongering and SK hunting, which are scummy.

It's like asking "what is 2 plus 2" and then saying a person is scummy for mentioning 4.

SK is scum though.
I didn't read it as fear though.

SK is not scum. SK is a different alignment. SK is anti-town.

[Aristophanes]

Your response to my vote is to try and crawl back to RVS? Nah. Ladies and gents, scum found.

I assumed this ^
Was in response to this:

Didn't I teach you a lot about how SK and scum are different in the Halloween game?

Second, SKs aren't relevant here.

VOTE: SilverWolf

No sympathy from me, you're better than this.

That's a reachy reason for a vote considering my vote was purely RVS.

I feel like you were just looking for a reason to pounce.

I am not impressed. :/

Since Inquisition seems to be trying to pull us back to RVS as well as being defensive for no reason.its also what the #3 Silverwolf was confused about was referring to. Makes sense to me.

Also, this is early game. Of course it's a bit reach. That got reactions for a further case.

Let's do this!
VOTE: Inquisitor

Ninja'd, but out and my hands are cold. Will read later.