In post 424, Titus wrote:I realized I do have to redact the claim or suggestion that I don't think I played as scum with you Wolf.
Bastard++ is that game.
Did you see me link it way earlier in the game when Rob asked me for games?
In post 424, Titus wrote:I realized I do have to redact the claim or suggestion that I don't think I played as scum with you Wolf.
Bastard++ is that game.
In post 423, Titus wrote:@SW, That's the exact reason I get when town Mislynch me. You just don't feel town, but when you win as scum without lying, honesty becomes scummy I guess.
Vedith is lying and twisting, yet you find it to be town. Dismissing it with no thought at all. It's frustrating.
I am trying to get some sort of engagement on my scumreads but I am not getting any analytical thought but from Rob.
In post 416, Titus wrote:Found my next to last scum game non hydra based on last post in the thread....
Bastard++ http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=61812
I still think looking at games such as
Bowser's Mafia (Town)
and Newbie 1388 (Scum)
Are more relevant for knowing my base nature as either alignment before I learned much.
In post 421, pistachi0n wrote:When I've played with ASP, he's inactive in the beginning of the game but gets better day 2 and beyond. That's what I'm expecting.
In post 426, SilverWolf wrote:In post 423, Titus wrote:@SW, That's the exact reason I get when town Mislynch me. You just don't feel town, but when you win as scum without lying, honesty becomes scummy I guess.
Vedith is lying and twisting, yet you find it to be town. Dismissing it with no thought at all. It's frustrating.
I am trying to get some sort of engagement on my scumreads but I am not getting any analytical thought but from Rob.
Have you changed your mind on Vedith? You had him as a townread IIRC.
Also, Why are you scumreading PB for lurking but are making excused for Ari when I call him out for not answering to any of the accusations against him.
What is the difference? Why is Ari town to you?
In post 430, Rob14 wrote:@SW: When I meta dive Titus, I'm looking at her general attitude and buddying tendencies, because that's something that is starting to feel "off" with me. It's very possible it's just the way she is, though, which would be a nice change of pace on a generally aggressive website.
Interestingly, the posts you've made recently have struck the same cord. A lot of agreeing with me. Not sure what to make of that. Mind supplyingyourlast two town and scum games?
In post 428, Rob14 wrote:In post 416, Titus wrote:Found my next to last scum game non hydra based on last post in the thread....
Bastard++ http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=61812
I still think looking at games such as
Bowser's Mafia (Town)
and Newbie 1388 (Scum)
Are more relevant for knowing my base nature as either alignment before I learned much.
Why would I want old shitty meta instead of new interesting meta? People learn their self metas and play to them after a while, so the new stuff is what's relevant to finding tells.
In post 430, Rob14 wrote:@SW: When I meta dive Titus, I'm looking at her general attitude and buddying tendencies, because that's something that is starting to feel "off" with me. It's very possible it's just the way she is, though, which would be a nice change of pace on a generally aggressive website.
Interestingly, the posts you've made recently have struck the same cord. A lot of agreeing with me. Not sure what to make of that. Mind supplyingyourlast two town and scum games?
In post 433, Rob14 wrote:I'll be back with a meta-related post during halftime probably. Go Ebron! 48 more yards from him and I kick Lamora's ass in fantasy.
In post 434, Titus wrote:In post 430, Rob14 wrote:@SW: When I meta dive Titus, I'm looking at her general attitude and buddying tendencies, because that's something that is starting to feel "off" with me. It's very possible it's just the way she is, though, which would be a nice change of pace on a generally aggressive website.
Interestingly, the posts you've made recently have struck the same cord. A lot of agreeing with me. Not sure what to make of that. Mind supplyingyourlast two town and scum games?
I am not sure what exactly you find us agreeing on.
We disagree on GL, the reason PB is scum (to me it's the broken promise), the proper use of meta, which I will get to in my next post, how to handle the Boon situation and people's reactions, so what do we agree on other than being civil to each other?
In post 427, SilverWolf wrote:@GL-Why is Ari scum to you?
In post 205, Aristophanes wrote:Also, Vedith's 61 is bad and I don't like it. It frames Titus as scum, but badly.
In post 220, GuiltyLion wrote:@Aristophanes do you think anyone is going to read 61 and change their own personal read on Titus because of it? Because to me it looks like he's clearly poking for a reaction and you're reaching for reasons to justify a scumread.
In post 150, Aristophanes wrote:I have a feeling I'm gonna look scummy this game. Just forewarning you.
Maybe I like leading everyone rong, though.
In post 438, Rob14 wrote:In post 434, Titus wrote:In post 430, Rob14 wrote:@SW: When I meta dive Titus, I'm looking at her general attitude and buddying tendencies, because that's something that is starting to feel "off" with me. It's very possible it's just the way she is, though, which would be a nice change of pace on a generally aggressive website.
Interestingly, the posts you've made recently have struck the same cord. A lot of agreeing with me. Not sure what to make of that. Mind supplyingyourlast two town and scum games?
I am not sure what exactly you find us agreeing on.
We disagree on GL, the reason PB is scum (to me it's the broken promise), the proper use of meta, which I will get to in my next post, how to handle the Boon situation and people's reactions, so what do we agree on other than being civil to each other?
The agreeing is SW, which is one form of potential buddying. The potential buddying from you (more of an "odd vibe" really) is more subtle.
In post 423, Titus wrote:I am trying to get some sort of engagement on my scumreads but I am not getting any analytical thought but from Rob.
In post 437, Rob14 wrote:In post 433, Rob14 wrote:I'll be back with a meta-related post during halftime probably. Go Ebron! 48 more yards from him and I kick Lamora's ass in fantasy.
Literally as I posted this Ebron went down with a knee injury, doesn't look like he'll return. Fuck me, am I right?
In post 426, SilverWolf wrote:
Have you changed your mind on Vedith? You had him as a townread IIRC.
In post 441, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 423, Titus wrote:I am trying to get some sort of engagement on my scumreads but I am not getting any analytical thought but from Rob.
Yo if you want to have a discussion, fire away. I'd be happy for you to move your scumreading focus to actual scum
Also flubbernugget is a townlean for me. Prolapsed_Brain is starting to look worse with his lack of content, I have no idea where he's at. Flubbernugget doesn't post much explanation but the reads/callouts/vote he has made all look town-motivated from where I'm sitting.
In post 447, SilverWolf wrote:In post 426, SilverWolf wrote:
Have you changed your mind on Vedith? You had him as a townread IIRC.
@Titus