In post 20, supercool898 wrote:
In a normal case, it would be true. The way I looked at it is if he was stating his vote was non-RVS, then in order to make that true, the statement "non-RVS vote" would need to be his reason.
I see what you are saying now.
In post 21, supercool898 wrote:
I view RVS as sort of an ice breaker. It allows people to talk and make mistakes. When a person makes a mistake, then that is when RVS starts to end.
What kind of meaningful mistake can be made when everyone is simply making a joke vote?