In post 634, Titus wrote:
As for wgeurts's wall, he's doing the very thing he proclaims I am doing. Making strawmen. He turns my posts into something easier to attack than what they are. For instance, he tries to make my legit vote into something easier to attack by trying to bypass the history that SW and I had that fueled the vote. He's also dragging us back to something that's been settled trying to provoke an emotional response to make me easier to discredit.
He also says that I tried to pain anyone who defended SW's innacurate, fear causing statements as her scumbuddy. That's just not true either.
Nothing in that wall post (minus the associative tells bit) is new or novel. Nothing that could not have been said at the time, and wgeurts or other heads were spamming about papayas.
You complain about someone trying to discredit you when you've been doing that to me literally all game.
You are consistently displaying behavior that you are calling scummy in others and displaying a self-centered approach to the game. If Ari agree'd with you, he was town. But if I call someone town who agrees with me, that's scummy. If I don't like your constant discrediting of me, that's not happening but if someone else calls you out on something, you say they are trying to discredit you and it's scummy.
) is far scummier.
