In post 25, mastin2 wrote:If I could have a hydra partner handle the actual skype element of the game, I'd be down for it, but otherwise, I'll have to pass.
Mastin, the Skype thing is optional and completrly unrelated to the game, other than in that coug is letting us join that Skype and chat about random stuff if we want to.
As the last rays of sunlight fade, one killer chases another through the tangled madness of the city.
A flash of steel announces the presence of his quarry.
The stage is set.
The night explodes.
In post 27, Cerberus v666 wrote:Mastin, the Skype thing is optional and completrly unrelated to the game, other than in that coug is letting us join that Skype and chat about random stuff if we want to.
This. I am allowing it for people who want a flavor advantage, and I have not asked for or gotten authorization to run the game off-site.
I will play if and only if we policy lynch Ika day 1
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I don't think any of this is appropriate for here. If you have a thought like that and want to play the game, pm the mod about wotc, and if it doesn't apply here then it doesn't apply. For the record though, I''d much rather play with the individual who people have a problem with, than the people who choose to ostracize them. The post you made Nero Cain, wasn't acceptable. You're not even signed up for the game, and you choose to come here just to publicly insult another player.
In post 46, Cerberus v666 wrote:I don't think any of this is appropriate for here. If you have a thought like that and want to play the game, pm the mod about wotc, and if it doesn't apply here then it doesn't apply. For the record though, I''d much rather play with the individual who people have a problem with, than the people who choose to ostracize them. The post you made Nero Cain, wasn't acceptable. You're not even signed up for the game, and you choose to come here just to publicly insult another player.
dont worry about it we all undertsand he has a butthurt attiutde and jsut like to fules his own ego like this
*shrugz* coug sent me an e-mail and asked if I wanted to play and I was considering it until I found out Ika was here. I mean I just rather not play with someone that doesn't even play to his wincon. He should be sitebanned but meh. I mean in a way I hate to be that guy that says "its ika or me" and even then I doubt enough people actually care and its not like I'm going to "win" and Ika will get kicked out but at the same time I don't think there's any wrong in pointing out objectively harmful play regardless of alignment. As an example; would it be wrong of me to point out if a player was chronic flake?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
If you're not playing in the game, in a public forum, yes. You should have messaged coug about your concerns, and then in the event that you still signed up, messaged ika civilly about your issues with his play and seen if you could come to better understand one another, and thus work to reduce the amount of poor play you see when you play.
But ya know, that's just what I'd do instead of trying to shame him.