In post 123, Ythan wrote:We know that your solution isn't the right one and that's good enough for me re: this thread.
Do you have some sort of empirical evidence you can point me to that demonstrates my suggestion isn't the right one?
In post 123, Ythan wrote:We know that your solution isn't the right one and that's good enough for me re: this thread.
In post 122, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 120, Ythan wrote:What I'm saying is you're being really persistent in ignoring a lot of people who have been here longer than you saying "No really dude we know what we're talking about this isn't the first time it's come up."
That argument would only be relevant if it had been tried before and it didn't work. Saying that you've had this discussion before does not make your argument stronger, it simply means that it wasn't resolved in the past, and it continues to be a problem, which would seem to indicate that the current strategy for dealing with it isn't working in a fashion satisfactory to at least some portion of the community.
In post 125, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 123, Ythan wrote:We know that your solution isn't the right one and that's good enough for me re: this thread.
Do you have some sort of empirical evidence you can point me to that demonstrates my suggestion isn't the right one?
In post 119, Cerberus v666 wrote:Whoever it was who mentioned three strikes, talah I believe it was: It just irritates me that every game I play in has SEVERAL replace outs by the end. In a large, I can expect a quarter to a third of the players to just drop the game, leading to a very real change in the flow of the game. Is your irritation more important than mine? No, it isn't.
In post 125, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 123, Ythan wrote:We know that your solution isn't the right one and that's good enough for me re: this thread.
Do you have some sort of empirical evidence you can point me to that demonstrates my suggestion isn't the right one?
In post 140, xRECKONERx wrote:How about "the shit you're suggesting is shit that has been suggested before and everyone is tired of having the same arguments"?
In post 127, kuribo wrote:In post 122, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 120, Ythan wrote:What I'm saying is you're being really persistent in ignoring a lot of people who have been here longer than you saying "No really dude we know what we're talking about this isn't the first time it's come up."
That argument would only be relevant if it had been tried before and it didn't work. Saying that you've had this discussion before does not make your argument stronger, it simply means that it wasn't resolved in the past, and it continues to be a problem, which would seem to indicate that the current strategy for dealing with it isn't working in a fashion satisfactory to at least some portion of the community.
Let's try this exercise.
Please answer the following questions as truthfully as possible.
1. What will you be doing exactly four months from today?
2. Can you assure me that your current health will remain the same?
3. Can you asssure me that all of your relatives will remain healthy for the next four months?
5. Do you have a job? Are you 100% sure that your working hours will remain exactly the same for four months?
6. Are you in a relationship? Can you assure me that absolutely nothing will go wrong in that relationship for four months?
7. Do you have a home? Utilities? Can you assure me that absolutely nothing will interfere with that for the next four months?
8. Are you 100% sure that no one on the site hates you?
9. Are you 100% sure that you won't have personality conflicts with anyone?
Please answer completely and honestly
In post 62, kuribo wrote:Comparing Mafia to League--- which is widely known for having one of the most vitriolic and toxic communities in online gaming--- is probably not going to make the point you're trying to make. If any online game shows what happens when a user base is devoid of empathy, it's LoL.
Last I checked, people didn't WANT this site to become LoL.
In post 144, Cerberus v666 wrote:
Why not? Kuribo at least is still talking about ths rationally from the other side of the discussion.
In post 142, Cerberus v666 wrote:In post 140, xRECKONERx wrote:How about "the shit you're suggesting is shit that has been suggested before and everyone is tired of having the same arguments"?
Irrelevant. Your lack of desire to engage in the process of discussing a viable solution to the problem doesn't make rhe problem go away, and it doesn't reduce my desire to seek said solution.