Mini 1720 Number Mafia | Endgame snuggles

[Plotinus]

Official Vote Count 3.09 Logarithms

I didn’t understand logarithms when I was taught them in school. It was hard to shuffle the numbers around and get them in the right order and hard to understand what the purpose of it was and what I was really doing when I used a logarithm. I didn’t really understand them intuitively until I encountered this ViHart video a while back.

Addition is counting in a + 1 kind of way.

Multiplication is counting in a +2 kind of way, counting in a +5 kind of way.

What is 27 when counting in a + 9 sort of way? 3. That’s division.

Exponentiation is counting in a times sort of way. 8 is 3 when counting in a times twoish sort of way.

In a system that counts in a times 3 sort of way, 81 is 4 steps. log₃ 81 = 4.
log₆₄ 128 = 7/6

BlueBloodedToffee

(L-2): lalaladucks, All Alone, Fro99er, JarJarDrinks

Bellaphant

(L-4): DeasVail, DeathRowKitty

Fro99er

(L-5): BlueBloodedToffee

JarJarDrinks

(L-5): Espeonage

DeathRowKitty

(L-5): JarJarDrinks

Not Voting

(2): MTD, Bellaphant

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline: 291st (3*97) day of the year or in (expired on 2015-10-18 14:00:00).

Let me know if there are any problems with the VC, or if you have maths related flavour requests.

Flavour Queue Written: Fermat’s Last Theorem, Hilbert Space Filling Curve

Spoiler: Things I haven’t rambled about yet but i’m gonna

more about the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, P vs NP, more figurate numbers, Hodge conjecture, Yang-Mills existence and mass gap, Mandelbrot Set, Complex Analysis, Lattice Multiplication, miscellaneous numberphile and vihart videos, practical numbers, hilbert numbers, leyland numbers, fibonacci numbers, jacobsthal numbers, pell numbers, pell-lucas numbers, leonardo numbers, perrin numbers, polite numbers, Erdős–Woods numbers, vampire numbers, Recursion and Mafia, maths jokes that I wrote myself and why they are funny, Abelian groups and semigroups, noncommutative operations, the 68-95-99.7 rule, fro99er’s first theorem

Mod notes: Today is the 282nd day of the year. 2*3*47! Frogger is V/LA until today. The deadline was wrong in all vote counts but the first one of day 3. I’ve fixed it.

[JarJarDrinks]

I think that BBT and Bella are scum together.

This is probably where I'm @. Though I'm split between bella and DRK.

[DeasVail]

Yeah, DRK is my alternate for either of them right now. I'm always worrying I'm completely off with my reads so I'm definitely not dismissing DRK as town.

[Plotinus]

Prodded Espeonage. He has (expired on 2015-10-10 20:24:00) to post.

[JarJarDrinks]

So nothing seems to be happening and BBT is @ L-2. Can we ask him to claim?

[Fro99er]

Ribbit

[Espeonage]

Sorry

Lets get this going

Unvote, Vote: BBT

[lalaladucks]

Lalala, do you think I'm crazy in thinking that wanderer playing against the grain and attacking All Alone over BBT makes BBT more likely town? I'm pretty sure you're town and I like your read on BBT, though my tendency in this sort of situation would be to lynch/vig Bella who I'd feel more comfortable with dead (<3 you Bella). If you tell me to vote BBT, I will though. (And this isn't an attempt to put the blame on you if he does flip town. I take full responsibility for whatever vote I make)

hmm
well
i'm of the opinion that wanderer was just trying to associate herself with bbt such that it looked like as a pair they were just too scummy to be scum together (because if they actually were a pair she

surely wouldn't

make it SOOO obvious right?? no i think wanderer would!)
but of course it's wifom so shrug
i won't tell you to vote bubbly, though i think we should lynch him! you can decide if he's suspicious enough for the rope :p

pedit:

L-1!

got a claim bubbles?

[JarJarDrinks]

pedit:

L-1!

got a claim bubbles?

Yeah, DV pretty much gave intent to hammer.

I will say that DV looks a little worse if BBT is scum. I've had him as a pretty solid townread most of the game but he definately seemed more reluctant than I would think he'd be to lynch BBT.

So if BBT does flip red, I still would lynch DRK/Bella next but DV should be looked @.

[DeasVail]

JarJar, you seemed quite reluctant until just recently yourself. Why did you think I'd be less so?

[DeasVail]

Oh yeah, and I'll officially claim intent to hammer and whatnot.

[JarJarDrinks]

JarJar, you seemed quite reluctant until just recently yourself. Why did you think I'd be less so?

Thats a fair point. But I know my alignment. I wouldn't fault other people if they were a little suspicious of me for it. Like I'd still be leaning town on you, just a little less so.

[MTD]

pedit:

L-1!

got a claim bubbles?

Yeah, DV pretty much gave intent to hammer.

I will say that DV looks a little worse if BBT is scum. I've had him as a pretty solid townread most of the game but he definately seemed more reluctant than I would think he'd be to lynch BBT.

So if BBT does flip red, I still would lynch DRK/Bella next but DV should be looked @.

firstly I'm not seeing this.
secondly I'd kind of like an answer to my question to dv before the day ends.
thirdly can someone give me a real quick rundown on why bubbles is scum? I still haven't read everything and right now I can't be bothered to either.

[MTD]

nvm the first point, I didn't read the post right -.-

[DeasVail]

secondly I'd kind of like an answer to my question to dv before the day ends.

If you don't want me to talk about it then I'm not going to answer questions from you requiring that I do.

[MTD]

secondly I'd kind of like an answer to my question to dv before the day ends.

If you don't want me to talk about it then I'm not going to answer questions from you requiring that I do.

-.-

[DeasVail]

Oh I think I misunderstood your post. I thought you were implying that because I was talking about ~PRs~, I must be scum, but I see you meant something else.

It didn't matter whether I was scum or not, but you were displaying an attitude where me being town would be the only reason you didn't consider BBT auto-scum and I don't want your opinion on my alignment to affect how you view BBT, as even if I were scum, there'd probably be a greater than 50% chance of some kind of kill-stopping role existing for the town.

[Bellaphant]

@DV, if BBT flips red, would scum!me really spend this long defending him? Really?

[Fro99er]

@DV, if BBT flips red, would scum!me really spend this long defending him? Really?

So why aren't you hammering?

[JarJarDrinks]

thirdly can someone give me a real quick rundown on why bubbles is scum? I still haven't read everything and right now I can't be bothered to either.

Here's a summary of stuff that's happened which point to BBT being scum. No one thing is too incriminating but if u add it all up it looks pretty bad.

- No death night 1
- All Alone claims to have roleblocked him night 1
- BBT says that roleblocking wont stop an attacker even though he's been told in past games that it would
- Scum Wanderer kept trying to make DV explain alternatives for there being a no kill
- Scum Wanderer claims to have watched BBT and says All Alone didn't target him
- All Alone wasn't killed
- BBT claims that scum killed Anti to make a BBT lynch happen even though there's no reason to think Anti would defend BBT
- BBT also tried to get DV to explain the missing kill

[lalaladucks]

interesting that bubbletea seems to have disappeared now when the votes have piled up

[Fro99er]

interesting that bubbletea seems to have disappeared now when the votes have piled up

To be fair, it's a weekend. But he is due a prod.

And we're gonna kick man u's ass

[Fro99er]

thirdly can someone give me a real quick rundown on why bubbles is scum? I still haven't read everything and right now I can't be bothered to either.

Here's a summary of stuff that's happened which point to BBT being scum. No one thing is too incriminating but if u add it all up it looks pretty bad.

- No death night 1
- All Alone claims to have roleblocked him night 1
- BBT says that roleblocking wont stop an attacker even though he's been told in past games that it would
- Scum Wanderer kept trying to make DV explain alternatives for there being a no kill
- Scum Wanderer claims to have watched BBT and says All Alone didn't target him
- All Alone wasn't killed
- BBT claims that scum killed Anti to make a BBT lynch happen even though there's no reason to think Anti would defend BBT
- BBT also tried to get DV to explain the missing kill

YOU FORGOT WOOLY SHEEP

[DeasVail]

@DV, if BBT flips red, would scum!me really spend this long defending him? Really?

You tell me!

[Plotinus]

Prodded BlueBloodedToffee. The prod timer runs slower on weekends. He has (expired on 2015-10-12 17:00:00) to post.