Open 612 - Bad Poets Society - Game Over - Town Win

GrayFoxxxx · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:44 am

In post 23, duppin wrote:VOTE: The Fire Hermit

Hello guys.

Ummmm. Take a moment to read the mod posts.

Vedith · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:45 am

I see RVS more of a "Lets get the game rolling" personally.

GrayFoxxxx · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:50 am

In post 25, Errantparabola wrote:Brunneis heres my train of thought

- rvs is a time where we pressure each other trying to get out of rvs. If i am wrong about this please let me know for future games
- ranger opened with light pressure on makara
- in my opinion makara overresponded to this pressure. Could have asked to explain the vote or something else (like he did with my vote) but he responded with a serious vote that has yet to be justified

I don't agree that mak over responded.
It felt like an almost equal response, to an odd vote.

The Fire Hermit · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 7:24 am

Hey guys, I am not contributing to your RVS. Cause I am damn confirmed!!!

I love that vote by Duppin on me, was really hilarious.

Also I approve of all wagons because it will help us get out of RVS, which we are still in.
I will be sure to lead this town as a conf to victory.

Lets have a great game all!

-Firebringer

goodmorning · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:39 am

oh fire

guys my vote was serious why does no-one want to engage me on that?????

duppin · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:44 am

Alright that was embarassing.

UNVOTE: The Fire Hermit

GrayFoxxxx · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:59 am

In post 29, goodmorning wrote:oh fire

guys my vote was serious why does no-one want to engage me on that?????

Actually your vote on him made me check his iso, and I don't really disagree with your stance.

Ika Musume · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:22 am

i don't find parabola's posts scummy. or Ranger's, for that matter.

vote: GM

free town points to anyone who can guess why i made this vote. bonus points for being first.

Trivium · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:35 am

Normally a townie doesn't ask for engagement on his own posts. But goodmorning seems to be trying to draw attention to himself, so that looks townie to me. Why are you asking for people to "guess why i made this vote", Ika? Why not say why instead of hiding your reasons that way?

Ika Musume · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:42 am

In post 33, Trivium wrote:Why are you asking for people to "guess why i made this vote", Ika? Why not say why instead of hiding your reasons that way?

reasons

goodmorning · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:45 am

In post 30, duppin wrote:Alright that was embarassing.

UNVOTE: The Fire Hermit

it's ok, we're laughing with you, not at you

In post 31, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
In post 29, goodmorning wrote:guys my vote was serious why does no-one want to engage me on that?????

Actually your vote on him made me check his iso, and I don't really disagree with your stance.

But Grayyyyyyyyy

agreement is so boringgggg

In post 32, Ika Musume wrote:free town points to anyone who can guess why i made this vote. bonus points for being first.

ooooohhhhh! I KNOW THIS ONE!!!!!

Is it a reaction test? It's ALWAYS a reaction test.

In post 33, Trivium wrote:Normally a townie doesn't ask for engagement on his own posts. But goodmorning seems to be trying to draw attention to himself, so that looks townie to me.

This looks like a contradiction of sorts.

That said, I WANNA FIGHT SOME BITCHES

AHHHH

p-edit: yup, definitely a reaction test then

boorrrinngggg

Ika Musume · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:49 am

In post 35, goodmorning wrote:p-edit: yup, definitely a reaction test then

boorrrinngggg

fyi i have a serious reason for voting, but it's an ultra weak one.

why do you find parabola's posts scummy?

goodmorning · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:53 am

Looks like an attempt to grab credit for ending RVS etc, anyone could see that 'lol my vote might or might not be serious' is obviously not serious ffs

Ika Musume · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:57 am

hi ppl what have i missed?

Varsoon · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:09 am

In post 38, Ika Musume wrote:hi ppl what have i missed?

Ika Musume · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:12 am

In post 39, Varsoon wrote:
In post 38, Ika Musume wrote:hi ppl what have i missed?

jpg

YOU GOT TO BE SQUIDDING ME! I CANT POST BULLSHIT?

Well this is jsut Squidtasitc.

Brunneis · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:34 am

OK, I can see

Parabola's

train of thought in 24

But here's my question:

How was

Mak

over-responding? All he did was inquire about how your vote was better placed on him. 14

In post 27, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
In post 25, Errantparabola wrote:Brunneis heres my train of thought

- rvs is a time where we pressure each other trying to get out of rvs. If i am wrong about this please let me know for future games
- ranger opened with light pressure on makara
- in my opinion makara overresponded to this pressure. Could have asked to explain the vote or something else (like he did with my vote) but he responded with a serious vote that has yet to be justified

I don't agree that mak over responded.
It felt like an almost equal response, to an odd vote.

Speaking of equal responses, I see you haven't responded to 20.

GrayFoxxxx · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:58 am

In post 41, Brunneis wrote:OK, I can see
Parabola's
train of thought in 24

But here's my question:

How was
Mak
over-responding? All he did was inquire about how your vote was better placed on him. 14

In post 27, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
In post 25, Errantparabola wrote:Brunneis heres my train of thought

- rvs is a time where we pressure each other trying to get out of rvs. If i am wrong about this please let me know for future games
- ranger opened with light pressure on makara
- in my opinion makara overresponded to this pressure. Could have asked to explain the vote or something else (like he did with my vote) but he responded with a serious vote that has yet to be justified

I don't agree that mak over responded.
It felt like an almost equal response, to an odd vote.

Speaking of equal responses, I see you haven't responded to 20.

Ummm...looks like rvs, but sure.
Why me?

The Fire Hermit · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:54 am

Grayfox you are acting very odd this game, just your entrance has gotten weird vibes from me.

The Fire Hermit · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:56 am

Well not your entrance but your whole "I am relooking at his iso" like, what iso? Theres 44 posts in the game and nobody has more than like 5.

The Fire Hermit · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:57 am

In post 19, Vedith wrote:Potatoes are green
Bananas are red
This is bad poetry
I'm a vote Maxwell dead.

VOTE: Maxwell

We should sheep Vedith, because Vedith is awesome.

-Firebringer

The Fire Hermit · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:58 am

In post 38, Ika Musume wrote:hi ppl what have i missed?

You missed a great party, everyone was wasted.

good times were had by all.
Please tell me Ika you will post more content posts than this game, right?

-Firebringer

Errantparabola · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:04 pm

In post 37, goodmorning wrote:Looks like an attempt to grab credit for ending RVS etc

In post 15, Errantparabola wrote:I would say props for taking us out of rvs

Here is a post of me doing the exact opposite

In post 41, Brunneis wrote:How was Mak over-responding? All he did was inquire about how your vote was better placed on him

When I mean overresponding, I'm talking about makara's omgus serious vote

Vedith · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 12:11 pm

Yeah I'm going on a limb with FB being town... (I know he's IC btw :roll)

@Brunneis - 41 - Why did you originally ask Ranger and Errant and then mention the Gray hasn't responded?

@GM - 37 - Lets talk more on this. When on earth do people get credit for ending RVS?

Ranger · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:07 pm

Brunneis wrote:Can you both explain why?

Easily. When I posted my vote on makara, I was convinced everyone who had posted was far more likely to be town than not. (Obviously, can't put much stock in RVS posting, but Ika, makara, Varsoon, and GrayFox all didn't look like scum with their opening votes, and you gotta start

somewhere

.) However, I knew that if I voted for someone who hadn't posted with my "may or may not be serious" disclaimer, everyone would assume it wasn't serious. So I voted makara in spite of not thinking makara was scum, waiting for someone to vote in a manner that looked like scum.

Errant following my vote made me instantly think she was scum.