264 I am well aware of the message Great Value intended to convey. Notice his I said
if the post was read according to the rules of grammar
. Scum distancing themselves from their own votes subconsciously is a thing that happens. That's the point I was making and that would have been clear if you asked for clarification.
267 Seriously? A catchup on pages 4-9 when you look like you're actively reading and following the game SN? WTF.
This Quailford read is a lot of bollocks and looks designed to prime the conclusion Quailford is scummier than Dipsy. Both Quailford and Dipsy have had weak or nonsensical posting. Even here, he undermines his strong townread in Spider Gwen by stating both are scummy but Quilford is scummier.
Here, SN's townread on Dipsy makes no sense given he's not realm challenging Gwen's assertions about Dipsy.
I don't like how he says my catch isn't clear considering many people understood it. He doesn't highlight what is unclear.
The read on Spider Gwen is simplistic and he makes no effort to reconcile the fact he disagrees with his townread.
SN borrowing a style from another player is creepy along with the lack of analysis of 216.
I don't like the suggestion to waste a rolecop on a miller claim. Who knows if there even is a rolecop?
Again, NA is town but SN puts zero effort into highlighting why NA is town.
274 The white knighting of the NA wagon and NA is terrible. If all his townreads are pushing the NA wagon, then why not reconsider his position on NA? If it's because SN believes he has found who NA is, then why doesn't he reconsider that? The whole the wagon is town driven but wrong really wierds me out.
It's also inconsistent with the fact he says town and scum would be driven to NA's wagon. If both town and scum are drawn to voting NA because he's loud, then why is SN confident that the NA wagon is town driven?
VOTE: SN[/vote