In post 172, MarioManiac4 wrote:Consider Scorpius ad 3dice as suspicious.
Why?
In post 172, MarioManiac4 wrote:Consider Scorpius ad 3dice as suspicious.
In post 199, Syndesis wrote:...okay then...I guess it's time to dig through archived games!
In post 201, Firebringer wrote:In post 199, Syndesis wrote:...okay then...I guess it's time to dig through archived games!
I don't believe that is considered a normal mechanic.
It would be announced if it was in the game.
Monkeyman is trolling us I believe.
In post 195, Firebringer wrote:I don't know, ICE seems odd to me no matter how I look at it.
He is try hard town, but that doesn't mean he is town.
In post 203, Wanderer-nl wrote:
Does it mean he is scum then? Can you elaborate a bit more on this?
@Archmage: you seem to have a pretty clear opinion of who you want to vote. Why didn't you make an actual vote?
In post 201, Firebringer wrote:In post 199, Syndesis wrote:...okay then...I guess it's time to dig through archived games!
I don't believe that is considered a normal mechanic.
It would be announced if it was in the game.
Monkeyman is trolling us I believe.
In post 207, Syndesis wrote:So Archmage! How do you feel about...
-Scorpious, now that he's posted something?
-All Alone's push on you?
-3dice suggesting that you not knowing I was IC was a townslip?
Additionally, do you think the exchanges between Ice and Fire and Garmr have left any indicators of their respective alignments?
In post 214, Firebringer wrote:I have yet to decide if ICE is scum, though I did decide Garmr is town.
And I don't use their two interactions alone to decide that.
In fact that is one of the least considerations I have used to try figuring out ICE.
Not everything is about two players interactions >.>
In post 215, Garmr wrote:I want to set up a town block this game with fire being the only one i trust so far.
Archmage wrote:
@ICEninja, why will the reasons for my scumminess become more clear as more content arises? Why can't they become clear right now?
In post 217, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:In post 215, Garmr wrote:I want to set up a town block this game with fire being the only one i trust so far.
eye twitch
I don't suppose you mean, bloc, do you? Block and bloc are two incredibly different things. Blocs are for groups that vote together. Blocks are put in the way of progress (although, I guess you could say that some blocs are, too).
In any case, I don't think setting up voting blocs are a great idea in a game of mafia. I can see potential positives, but I don't think that outweighs the possibility for discouraging original thought. And that's not even taking into account the fact that a voting bloc could be made partially or entirely of mafiosi. I guess I can'tstopyou and Fire from forming a voting bloc, but I wouldn't agree with it.
In post 215, Garmr wrote:I want to set up a town block this game with fire being the only one i trust so far.
In post 175, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:Oh. Right. Sorry. Knowing that there's an Innocent Child in the game, I probably ought to have checked who that was. I feel like the biggest idiot in the world.
In post 175, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:I was trying to be humorous with the Davsto thing. I was just under the impression that people wanted to know what my reads were, so I listed all the information and put down what few ideas I had.
Uck. I cause more problems than good in real life, why should it be any different anywhere else?
In post 194, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:Post 146wasreally forced, to be honest. I really wanted to contribute something, and I felt like if I went through all the ISOs I might find something. In the end, though, there wasn't anything really conclusive.
In post 194, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:Agreed. I'm not proud of my readlist.
In post 127, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 26, Garmr wrote:In post 21, ICEninja wrote:No, I read it correctly. I was hoping you'd unvote or attack me in another way in order to attempt to cement your vote but alas you're more likely town based on that response alone.
Unvote.
Garmr seemed excited that he knew who would be confirmed town.Maybe that excitement came from already having a solid N1 target?
Vote Garmr.
Ice I was excited because I got actually play instead of not being able to which was looking like the case before. I don't like the bolded comment here it seems like your hunting for a power role this early. Town roles may target the innocent child as well and i think anyone would of thought of this. I feel like this is the wrong attitude to scum hunt for town so I draw the conclusion that your scum.
Looking back, this really makes no sense at all. If Ice was grasping at straws I the beginning, this is really grasping for something. I also feel like garmr is playing rather defensive.
In post 147, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 139, Garmr wrote:Dude your taking everything ice at face value with out looking at intentions that's not a good way to scum hunt also no vote on me yet your pushing me whers the pressure
No, I'm looking at the true intentions of his post and not hard tunneling him, and I'm quite fine with where my vote is now.
In post 78, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 77, Davsto wrote:In post 75, Syndesis wrote:In post 73, Davsto wrote:I believe he put the statement infinitely more eloquently than I could. It's easier to quote and say "this is true" than it is to basically restate the entire thing.
Hi. Got anything to add?
Not really. It's page four. I often struggle to get much early on.
You don't have any opinion on fire or ninja?