In post 1197, pistachi0n wrote:In post 1174, A Simple Plan wrote:And you argue that you hadn't been coasting? You're scum-reading Flubber here for doing what you were doing.
My posts were better than Flubber's.
How do you suppose? Your posts amounted to a terrible vote on Rob and the beginning of a read-hop on Titus, claiming you didn't want to vote him despite there being 17 days left.
In the portion of your post I left out of this quote, you specified you wanted your vote to count, so instead of being the only vote on a Rob wagon you could see wasn't taking off (despite Boonskies' support), you act as the only vote on Flubber? How does that vote count for more than it would on Rob?
In post 1174, A Simple Plan wrote:Conflicting reads on Titus, bouncing back and forth
Yes, I was genuinely unsure how I felt about Titus and was trying to sort it out in my mind.[/quote]
Looks a whole lot to me like avoiding the wagon on your partner...
1) What harm would've come from a Titus vote? As of VC 1.3 (260), there were three on Titus' wagon with seven to lynch, and your vote shift from Rob to Flubber came in 315, AFTER the driving force behind the wagon (Silver) switched votes from Titus to Aristophanes (294), so your vote would've been L-4. What harm would've come from that if you, at the time, your only hindrance appeared to be how much time we had left? (See 313)
2) What persuaded you to believe SW was townier than Titus in regard to their argument? And what persuaded you to change your read and label Titus town?