In post 846, Jeanne11 wrote:Because you're trusting LQ blindly and refuse to even think he could be scum under any circumstances.
In post 201, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 199, Titus wrote:In post 196, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 176, Jeanne11 wrote:Hey, everyone, Titus said it herself, she gets angrier the more certain the probability of lynch is. Let's see if she's gonna start yelling if we lynch her scumbuddy Elbirn.
This is the worst fucking argument I've seen in this thread so far. But Jeanne11 can't be serious her. I still don't like it at all.
I'd really like it if Jeanne11 got some pressure on them, because these kinds of posts are shitty and I don't want to see Jeanne11 skate by with this kind of shit.
VOTE: Jeanne11
It's actually true. I get frustrated with bad lynches as town and aggressive conspire to out scum.
That mailman isn't here and he's inadvertently making me look bad for getting caught in traffic. Oh well.
The point stands, I don't like Jeanne11's posts.
In post 852, Jeanne11 wrote:I started thinking that when Titus confirmed that my assessment that she gets angrier when chances of lynch were more likely and LQ said that his point still stands. A town player wouldn't say something after my assessment was confirmed by her.
In post 854, Jeanne11 wrote:And then there's a fact that when I gut read, I am some sort of a monster in his eyes, yet when you gut read, he sees you as some sort of saint. Either he's biased much or you're his scumbuddy.
In post 858, Jeanne11 wrote:Also, you say Titus isn't a God, yet you are acting as if LQ is a God. Such a hypocrite.
In post 864, Jeanne11 wrote:You still have him as town read, allowing him to manipulate you easily, if you are town. Don't make the mistake I made in that game.
In post 865, wgeurts wrote:Also if you're only voting LQ cus titus was in some manner then your current scum read of titus should logically mean you town read LQ.
Also there ARE ALWAYS MISTAKES! period.
People mislynch constantly, town can only mislynch if town made mistakes. Your logic is faulty.
In post 866, Titus wrote:Your behavior though is anti-town. All your reads being omgus isn't helpful. While no mistakes should happen, they do. You can't throw the baby out with the bath water. If you play with someone for quite awhile and know they can read you, then this approach may be valid on that player.
As for 861, those are the points you need to elaborate on. Not the LQ is scumreading you therefore scum bit.
In post 866, Titus wrote:Your behavior though is anti-town. All your reads being omgus isn't helpful. While no mistakes should happen, they do. You can't throw the baby out with the bath water. If you play with someone for quite awhile and know they can read you, then this approach may be valid on that player.
As for 861, those are the points you need to elaborate on. Not the LQ is scumreading you therefore scum bit.
In post 869, wgeurts wrote:In post 866, Titus wrote:Your behavior though is anti-town. All your reads being omgus isn't helpful. While no mistakes should happen, they do. You can't throw the baby out with the bath water. If you play with someone for quite awhile and know they can read you, then this approach may be valid on that player.
As for 861, those are the points you need to elaborate on. Not the LQ is scumreading you therefore scum bit.
That's what I'm saying, her logic is flawed