Wut?In post 934, Ranger wrote:This was very obviously pre-typed in a PT, at some prior point to my 817.wgeurts wrote:So let's start with Ranger,he
Now what kind of player would have access to a PT, hmm?
Where the hell are you drawing this conclusion from? This is some serious conf-bias or just scum crumpets.
I mess up pronouns all the town, I've been corrected in almost every game I'm in. Sometimes I check, sometimes I don't.
He doesn't do opportunism guys, there's absolutely no way he's lying and he's even got "proof"; he must be town. Lol, this isn't even an argument for you being town and is honestly rather scummy.I don't do opportunism, as explained in 138.His next post 125 and 126 he votes LQ without any reason what so ever, it feels a little opportunistic as LQ was under quite a bit of pressure around then.
Well, could you go grab a few of his posts were he was "devoid of town play" and explain how it's so? Also saying what that "one" town thing was would help. Anyone can make a statement and can look convincing, getting proof is the real work though and is where scum slip.LicketyQuickety was my vote for one simple reason: most of his posting was utterly devoid of a town process. (Note that when I voted LQ, I was not caught up in the thread. I post as I catch up.) I'd be lying if I said LQ's posting was all scum; there wasonebrief section of the game where LQ put up a good show, but given that his content beforeandafter that time period was and is still bad, it was exactly that: nothing but a show.
RVS content is almost always fully irrelevant and almost always void of alignment indicative stuff. Beyond VCA there's not much to be drawn from it and VCA requires flips which we don't yet have.This is subjective and you should know it. RVS content never is irrelevant.His scum read on Brantz is also complete crumpets as that slot hasn't actually really produced any content worth pushing yet.
And could you give us examples from your home site where it was actually correct?On my home site, we continue to scrutinize D1 (which is usually almost all RVS aside from some maybe-serious pushes near the very end) throughout the entirety of the game. I did not like BRantz's entry.
It's like pushing someone because they made a joke.
Destroyed in my last post.Titus's reads were a copy of mine, not vice-versa. This is easily shown by linking posts like 213 (where I say I was not marking someone I thought was town), 441 (me stating my suspicion on BM), 443 (where my scumread is explicit on BM), 444 (where I say Elbirn is town, RR is null but possible, and BRantz is my third suspicion next to BM and LQ), 446 (where I say RR is possibly scum), and 448 (where I explain in more detail the possibility of RR being scum).All the way up to post 748 where he suddenly creates a reads-list identical to titus' containing no reasoning for the reads at all.
This all shows very, very clearly where my reads were coming from in my reads list. To say I copied it from another is ridiculous. They're my reads. What kind of horrible player do you think I am, to need to copy the reads of another player? I repeat: not a newb. Titus sharing the reads is either coincidence or effort on her part to copy mine. This is especially true given that I post as I read rather than catching up all at once and making a giant wall.
is rather scummy yes. Especially since you'd been parked on him all game.What.His 768 is also horrifically scummy, it looks likes he's setting himself up to vote whoever the town ends up deciding to lynch.
Me trying tolead the town and spearhead a LQ lynch.
Destroyed last post.Is somehow me trying to set myself up to vote whoever the town ends up deciding to lynch?
I want LQ lynched. Titus and Jeanne were both off the wagon, tunneling each other. I wanted them both on the wagon, so I asked. In what twisted realm can you possibly interpret that as trying to lynch anyone rather than me trying to lynch one specific person?
Because my mark did the speaking for me about my read on you. The mark is a negative thing for the marked. Therefore, by implication, me marking you would reveal my scumread on you the minute I flipped. (Because I would never mark a player I thought was town.)I also call complete bollux that he was scum reading me early game and thus marked me, he stated all other scum reads but happened to leave me unmenioned?
When I feel like it, yes. But for you and RR, the current strength of my read comes from how you both voted during the anonymous voting session, along with your reactions immediately after that. There was things before that made me have my eye on you two (your RVS posting being just as bad as Brantz's, some of RR's posting), but it was that which really (re)created the scumreads.Could you explain in your own words how everyone you listed as scum is actually scum in your eyes?
*avoids explaining any of his scum reads even more blatantly and only gives some vague explanation*
There can't be five scum in the game. Heck, there can't even be four, but I'm still suspicious of both you and RR in spite of there being room for only one of you in the scumteam. (Because BM and LQ both occupy strong spots that will not be changing.) You said it yourself: BRantz hasn't done much of anything in the game and has little to be read off of. While I had an initial scumread there, it is based off of things you yourself explicitly said were weak-at-best, and you're absolutely right. So, as a result, BRantz moved up to null when thanks to the stuff I talk about responding to quote above this one, you and RR moved down.What do you think or Brantz now? He's not changed anything since you last scum read him but he's suddenly null.
My secret. To find out, you'll either have to rolecop me or kill me.What does the mark do!?
All-in-all, this post has almost-entirely backwards reads.
